Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Visual language and augmentative communication systems for individuals with pervasive developmental disorders and autism are presented as both a legitimate language and an effective strategy. Using the natural aided language paradigm and picture symbols or printed words, language stimulation is implemented in natural environments to increase communication, interaction, participation, and compliance. Methods for choosing target environments, generating appropriate vocabulary, creating interactive language boards, and implementing them with appropriate communication partners are described. Samples of environmentally specific language boards are included. Effective strategies for inclusion, behavior management, leisure skills, and cognitive activities are targeted through visual language systems and augmentative communication.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpert, C.L. , & Rogers-Warren, A.K. (1985). Communication in autistic persons: Characteristics and intervention. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-Warren (Eds.), Teaching functional language (pp. 123-155). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .

Bondy, A. , & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1-19.

Cafiero, J.M. (1995). Teaching parents of children with autism picture communication symbols as a natural language to decrease levels of family stress . (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, University Microfilms No. 9540360.

Goosens', C. , Crain, S.S. , & Elder, P. (1992). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive symbolic communication 18 manths to 5 years developmentally. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.

Halle, J.W. , Baer, D.M. , & Spradlin, J. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of time delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Bebavior Analysis, 14(4), 389-409.

Hart, B. , & Risley, T.R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(4), 411-420.

Hunt, P. , & Goetz, L. (1988). Teaching spontaneous communication in natural settings through interrupted behavior chains. Topics in Language Disorders, 9(1), 58-71.

Lovaas, O.I. (1994, September/October). Interview with O.I. Lovaas . The Advacate, p. 1.

10.

Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The picture communication symbols (Books I-III) . Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.

11.

Mirenda, P. , & locono, T. (1988). Strategies for promoting augmentative and alternative communication in natural contexts for children with autism. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 3(4), 1-15.

12.

Mirenda, P. , & Locke, P. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in non-speaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131-140.

13.

Pierce, K.L. , & Schreibman, L. (1994). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism in unsupervised settings through pictorial self-management . Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 27(3), 471-481.

14.

Rogers-Warren, A. , & Warren, S.F. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly training language in children. Behavior Modification , 4(3), 361-381.

Communication Power for Individuals with Autism

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References