Data-based decision-making (DBDM) is crucial for teachers of students with autism or intellectual disability, yet little is known about their engagement in DBDM. We surveyed 77 teachers in the southeastern United States who had worked with students with autism or intellectual disability in self-contained classrooms in the past year. They reported their training and practices in DBDM and the variables they perceived to facilitate and inhibit data collection, graphing, and data-based decision-making. Teachers reported minimal training in DBDM. While some frequently collect data, methods and frequency of data interpretation for instructional decisions vary. Teachers identified time as the biggest barrier to DBDM. Despite recognizing its importance, teachers lack tools to meet accountability standards, highlighting the need for preservice training and ongoing support. Research is warranted on efficient and effective methods for training teachers of students with autism or intellectual disability to engage in DBDM in their classrooms.
BelfioreP. J.BrowderD. M. (1992). The effects of self-monitoring on teachers’ data-based decisions and on the progress of adults with severe mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/173.93.195.111
BrowderD. M.DemchakM.HellerM.KingD. (1989). An in vivo evaluation of the use of data-based rules to guide instructional decisions. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14(3), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698901400309
4.
BrowderD. M.KarvonenM.DavisS.FallinK.Courtade-LittleG. (2005). The impact of teacher training on state alternate assessment scores. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100304
5.
BrowderD. M.LibertyK.HellerM.D’HuyvettersK. K. (1986). Self-management by teachers: Improving instructional decision making. Professional School Psychology, 1(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0090506
6.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.JimenezB. (2011). Standards-based individualized education plans and progress monitoring. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 42–91). Guilford Press.
7.
BrowderD. M.WoodL.ThompsonJ.RibuffoC. (2014). Innovation configuration evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC-3). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations
8.
BruhnA. L.WehbyJ. H.HasselbringT. S. (2020). Data-based decision making for social behavior: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719876098
9.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards.
10.
DanielsonL.RosenquistC. (2014). Introduction to the TEC special issue on data-based individualization. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522965
11.
DemchakM.SutterC. (2019). Teachers’ perception of use and actual use of a data-based decision-making process. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(2), 175–185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26663975
12.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (1989). Teacher use of student performance data to make instructional decisions: Practices in programs for students with moderate to profound disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 14(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698901400103
13.
FildermanM.TosteJ.DidionL.PengP.ClemensN. (2018). Data-based decision making in reading interventions: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the effects for struggling readers. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918790001
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SteckerP. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 617–641. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028003617
16.
HillD. R.LemonsC. J. (2015). Early grade curriculum-based reading measures for students with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629515574812
17.
HojnoskiR. L.CaskieG. I. L.GischlarK. L.KeyJ. M.BarryA.HughesC. L. (2009). Data display preference, acceptability, and accuracy among urban Head Start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815109355982
JimenezB. A.MimsP. J.BakerJ. (2016). The effects of an online data-based decisions professional development for in-service teachers of students with significant disability. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(3), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500305
20.
KernL.WehbyJ. H. (2014). Using data to intensify behavioral interventions for individual students. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522970
21.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.ToewsS. G.McCabeK. M.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
22.
KurthJ. A.ZagonaA. L. (2018). Involvement and participation of students with severe disabilities in SWPBIS. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918766523
23.
LedfordJ. R.BartonE. E.HardyJ. K.ElamK.SeaboltJ.ShanksM.HemmeterM. L.KaiserA. (2016). What equivocal data from single case comparison studies reveal about evidence-based practices in early childhood special education. Journal of Early Intervention, 38(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116648000
24.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T. (2009). Crafting quality professional development for special education educators: What school leaders should know. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904200106
25.
McCammonM. N.WolfeK.GaoR.StarrettA. (2025). Training preservice teachers to make data-based decisions: A comparison of two interventions. Remedial and Special Education, 46(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231222482
26.
McMasterK. L.LembkeE. S.ShinJ.PochA. L.SmithR. A.JungP. G.. . .WagnerK. (2020). Supporting teachers’ use of data-based instruction to improve students’ early writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000358
PowellS. R.SteckerP. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914523735
29.
RodgersD. B.KingS. A.MartinG.LemonsC. J. (2024). Assessing the criterion validity of curriculum-based measures for children with intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 57(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669231166915
30.
RubleL. A.McGrewJ. H.WongW. H.MissallK. N. (2018). Special education teachers’ perceptions and intentions toward data collection. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118771391
31.
RuhterL.KarvonenM. (2023). The impact of professional development on data-based decision-making for students with extensive support needs. Remedial and Special Education, 46, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231164636
32.
RupparA. L.RobertsC. A.OlsonA. J. (2018). Developing expertise in teaching students with extensive support needs: A roadmap. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.412
33.
SnyderS. M.AyresK. (2020). Investigating the usage of reading curriculum-based measurement (CBM-R) to formatively assess the basic reading skills of students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 60–74.
34.
SpoonerF.McKissickB.KnightV. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916684896
35.
SwainK. D.HagamanJ. L.Leader-JanssenE. M. (2022). Teacher-reported IEP goal data collection methods. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1980849
36.
UtleyB. L.ZigmondN.StrainP. S. (1987). How various forms of data affect teacher analysis of student performance. Exceptional Children, 53(5), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298705300503
37.
van GeelM.KeuningT.VisscherA. J.FoxJ. P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637346
38.
WolfeK.McCammonM. N.LeJeuneL. M.HoltA. K. (2023). Training preservice practitioners to make data-based instructional decisions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-021-09439-0
39.
WolfeK.SlocumT. A. (2015). A comparison of two approaches to training visual analysis of AB graphs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(2), 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.212
40.
YellM. L.BatemanD. F. (2019). Free appropriate public education and Endrew F. v. Douglas Country School System (2017): Implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417754239
41.
YellM. L.ShrinerJ. G.KatsiyannisA. (2006). Individuals with disabilities education improvement act of 2004 and IDEA Regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v39i1.6824
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
