Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (FFT) is currently used in more than 20 states to inform teacher evaluation and professional learning. To investigate whether FFT promotes instruction that appropriately responds to the needs of students with learning disabilities, we conduct a systematic content analysis of the instructional approach emphasized in the FFT’s Instructional Domain (Domain 3) of Danielson’s FFT. We frame our study using cognitive load theory and research regarding effective instruction for students with disabilities. We end by discussing implications regarding the evaluation and development of effective teaching for students with learning disabilities.
Al OtaibaS.ConnorC. M.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.MeadowsJ.LiZ. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 535–560. https://doi.org/10.1086/659031
2.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
3.
BarrouilletP.BernardinS.CamosV. (2004). Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.83
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
6.
BrophyJ. E.GoodT. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). Macmillan.
7.
BrownellM. T.JonesN. D. (2015). Teacher evaluation in special education: Approaches, supporting research, and challenges confronted. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 28(2), 63–73.
8.
CampbellS. L.RonfeldtM. (2018). Observational evaluation of teachers: Measuring more than we bargained for?American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1233–1267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218776216
9.
ClarkR. E.KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.
10.
CohenD. K.RaudenbushS. W.BallD. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
11.
ConnorC. M.MazzoccoM.KurzT.CroweE. C.TigheE. L.WoodT. S.MorrisonF. J. (2018). Using assessment to individualize early mathematics instruction. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 97–113. https://doi.org/1016/j.jsp.2017.04.005
12.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.FishmanB.CroweE. C.Al OtaibaS.SchatschneiderC. (2013). A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychological Science, 24, 1408–1419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612472204
13.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.SchatschneiderC.TosteJ. R.LundblomE.CroweE. C.FishmanB. (2011). Effective classroom instruction: Implications of child characteristics by reading instruction interactsions on first graders’ word reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(3), 173–207.
14.
DanielsonC. (1997). Enhancing professional practice: A Framework for Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15.
DanielsonC. (2013). The Framework for Teaching evaluation instrument, 2013 instructionally focused edition. The Danielson Group.
16.
Dedoose Version 7.0.23, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed methods research data (2016). SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com
17.
DoablerC. T.BakerS. K.KostyD. B.SmolkowskiK.ClarkeB.MillerS. J.FienH. (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115, 303–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679969
18.
DonaldsonM. L.PapayJ. P. (2014). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 174–193). Routledge.
19.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM.MoodyS. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906500309
20.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM.MoodyS. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619. https://doi.org/1037//0022-0663.92.4.605
21.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
22.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522966
23.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.ZumetaR. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014701
24.
GageN. L.NeedelsM. C. (1989). Process-product research on teaching: A review of criticisms. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 253–300.
25.
GilmourA. F.MajeikaC. E.SheafferA. W.WehbyJ. H. (2019). The coverage of classroom management in teacher evaluation rubrics. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418781918
26.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.
27.
HewardW. L. (2003). Ten faulty notions about teaching and learning that hinder the effectiveness of special education. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690303600401
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
30.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
31.
JonesN.BrownellM. (2014). Examining the use of classroom observations in the evaluation of special education teachers. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413514103
32.
JonesN. D. (2016). Special education teacher evaluation: An examination of critical issues and recommendations for practice. In GrissomJ. A.YoungsP. (Eds.), Improving teacher evaluation systems: Making the most of multiple measures (pp. 63–76). Teachers College Press.
33.
JonesN. D.BuzickH. M.TurkanS. (2013). Including students with disabilities and English learners in measures of educator effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413514103
34.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
35.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
36.
MartinA. J. (2016). Using load reduction instruction (LRI) to boost motivation and engagement. British Psychological Society.
37.
MayerR. E. (2003). Memory and information processes. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 47–58). John Wiley.
38.
McLeskeyJ., Council for Exceptional Children, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.
39.
MercerC. D.LaneH. B.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.EiseleM. R. (1996). Empowering teachers and students with instructional choices in inclusive settings. Remedial and Special Education, 17(4), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259601700405
40.
MunterC.SteinM. K.SmithM. S. (2015). Dialogic and direct instruction: To distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debates surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–32.
PiagetJ. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
44.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.HayesN.MintzS.LaParoK. M. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary (CLASS-S). University of Virginia.
45.
PiantaR. C.LaParoK. M.HamreB. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS): Manual, Pre-K. Brookes.
46.
PressleyM.RoehrigA. D.RaphaelL.DolezalS.BohnC.MohanL.Wharton-McDonaldR.BognerK.HoganK. (2003). Teaching processes in elementary and secondary education. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 153–176). John Wiley.
SindelarP. T.DaunicA.RennellsM. S. (2004). Comparisons of traditionally and alternatively trained teachers. Exceptionality, 12, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1204_3
50.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
51.
SteinbergM. P.GarrettR. (2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715616249
52.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129–140.
53.
SwansonH. L.SiegelL. (2011). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 5–28.
54.
SwellerJ. (2012). Human cognitive architecture: Why some instructional procedures work and others do not. In HarrisK. R.GrahamS.UrdanT.McCormickC. B.SinatraG. M.SwellerJ. (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 295–325). American Psychological Association.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC. S.RobertsG. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struggling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531907.pdf
57.
WatkinsC.SlocumT. A. (2003). Elements of direct instruction. Journal of Direct Instruction, 3, 4–32.
