Research consistently demonstrates that attainment of a driver’s license and access to a vehicle directly and favorably influence employment outcomes, enhance one’s ability to capitalize on quality jobs, and expand one’s access to community and independent opportunities. This study used a driving simulator to provide driving lessons to 12 young adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs). The purpose was to use a safe learning environment to screen candidates for those who showed the potential to obtain a driver’s license. Instruction was provided using a set of interactive exercises focusing on controlling the vehicle via lane keeping, speed maintenance, and obstacle avoidance tasks. Results revealed that simulator training provided a safe learning environment to identify individuals demonstrating the potential to safely operate a motor vehicle. Participants demonstrated moderate to large gains in maintaining lane position, speed, braking response, and target detection. Implications and suggestions for future research are provided.
ArcherA.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Efficient and effective teaching. Guilford.
2.
BandaD. R.DogoeM. S.MatusznyR. M. (2011). Review of video prompting studies with persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 514–527.
3.
BarkleyR. A.CoxD. (2007). A review of driving risks and impairments associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 38(1), 113–128.
4.
BiedermanJ.FriedR.MonuteauxM. C.ReimerB.CoughlinJ. F.SurmanC. B.…FaraoneS. V. (2007). A laboratory driving simulation for assessment of driving behavior in adults with ADHD: A controlled study. Annals of General Psychiatry, 6, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-6-4
5.
BishopH. J.BiasiniF. J.StavrinosD. (2017). Social and non-social hazard response in drivers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 47(4), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2992-1
6.
BouckE. C. (2014). The postschool outcomes of students with mild intellectual disability: Does it get better with time?Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(6), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12051
7.
BrooksJ.SeeannerJ.HennessyS.ManganelliJ.CrislerM.RosopaP.…TannerS. (2017). Interactive tools for measuring visual scanning performance and reaction time. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(2), 7102350010p1–20102350020p6. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.020461
8.
BrooksJ. O.CrislerM. C.KleinN.GoodenoughR.BeecoR. W.GuirlC.…BeckC. (2011). Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 698–705.
9.
BrooksJ. O.MosseyM. E.TylerP.CollinsJ. C. (2014). An exploratory investigation: Are driving simulators appropriate to teach pre-driving skills to young adults with intellectual disabilities?British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 204–213.
10.
CheeD. T.LeeH. Y.PatomellaA. H.FalkmerT. (2019). Investigating the driving performance of drivers with and without autism spectrum disorders under complex driving conditions. Disability & Rehabilitation, 41(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1370498
11.
ClassenS.BrooksJ. (2014). Driving simulators for occupational therapy screening, assessment, and intervention. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 28(2), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2014.901590
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CoxD. J.MooreM.BurketR.MerkelR. L.MikamiA. Y.KovatchevB. (2008). Rebound effects of long-acting amphetamine or methylphenidate stimulant medication preparations among adolescent male drivers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2006.01411
14.
CoxD. J.PunjaM.PowersK.MerkelR. L.BurketR.MooreM.…KovatchevB. (2006). Manual transmission enhances attention and driving performance of ADHD adolescent males. Journal of Attention Disorders, 10(2), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054706288103
15.
DaviesD. K.StockS. E.WehmeyerM. L. (2002). Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer. Mental Retardation, 40(5), 358–365.
16.
DrasgowE.WoleryM.ChezanL. C.HalleJ. W.HajiaghamohseniZ. (2017). Systematic instruction of students with significant cognitive disabilities. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 632–648). Taylor & Francis.
17.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
18.
FoxR. T. (2012). Examining attention, impulsiveness, and cognitive failures in driving behaviors (Publication No. 1465, Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University). East Tennessee State University Digital Commons. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1465
19.
FriedmanC.RizzoloM. C. (2016). The state of transportation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Medicaid home and community-based services 1915(c) waivers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(3), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207316644413
20.
GroomM. J.van LoonE.DaleyD.ChapmanP.HollisC. (2015). Driving behavior in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 15, Article 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0566-y
21.
HatakkaM.KeskinenE.GregersenN. P.GladA.HernetkoskiK. (2002). From control of the vehicle to personal self-control: Broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00018-9
22.
HirdM. A.VeselyK. A.ChristieL. E.AlvesM. A.PongmoragotJ.SaposnikG.SchweizerT. A. (2015). Is it safe to drive after acute mild stroke? A preliminary report. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 354(1-2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.04.043
23.
Human Services Research Institute. (2012, October). Working in the community: The status and outcomes of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in integrated employment (NCI Data Brief).
24.
KassS. J.BeedeK. E.VodanovichS. J. (2010). Self-report measures of distractibility as correlates of simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 874–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.012
25.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.BruhnA. L.DriscollS. A.WehbyJ. H.ElliottS. N. (2009). Assessing social validity of school-wide positive behavior support plans: Evidence for the reliability and structure of the Primary Intervention Rating Scale. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 135–144.
26.
LichtenwalterS.KoeskeG.SalesE. (2006). Examining transportation and employment outcomes: Evidence for moving beyond the bus pass. Journal of Poverty, 10(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1300/j134v10n01_05
27.
MartensB. K.WittJ. C.ElliottS. N.DarveauxD. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.16.2.191
28.
MichaelisJ. R.McConnellD. S.SmitherJ. A. (2012). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder’s effects on individuals’ scan paths during a simulated drive. Work, 41, 5833–5835. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0967-5833
29.
MichaelsJ.ChaumillonR.Nguyen-TriD.WatanabeD.HirschP.BellavanceF.…FaubertJ. (2017). Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups. PLOS ONE, 12(10), Article e0185909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185909
30.
MottaK.LeeH.FalkmerT. (2014). Post-stroke driving: Examining the effect of executive dysfunction. Journal of Safety Research, 49, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.005
31.
MyklebustJ. O.BåtevikF. O. (2009). Earning a living for former students with special educational needs. Does class placement matter?European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250902793677
32.
National Core Indicators. (2014). Using National Core Indicators (NCI) data for quality improvement initiatives. National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services and Human Services Research Institute. http://www.nationalcoreindicators.org/
33.
NoelV. A.OulveyE.DrakeR. E.BondG. R. (2017). Barriers to employment for transition-age youth with developmental and psychiatric disabilities. Administration & Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(3), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0773-y
34.
PucherJ.RenneJ. L. (2003). Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), 49–77.
35.
Reynolds-KeeferL.JohnsonR.DickensonT.McFaddenL. (2009). Validity issues in the use of pictorial Likert scales. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 6(3), 15–24.
36.
RossV.CoxD. J.ReeveR.BrownT.MoncriefM.SchmittR.GffneyG. (2018). Measuring the attitudes of novice drivers with autism spectrum disorder as an indication of apprehensive driving: Going beyond basic abilities. Autism, 22(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317735959
37.
SantosA.McGuckinN.NakamotoH. Y.GrayD.LissS. (2011). Summary of travel trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Federal Highway Administration.
38.
SchultheisM. T.RebimbasJ.MourantR.MillisS. R. (2007). Examining the usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assistive Technology, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131860
39.
SchwartzI. S.BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
40.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
41.
ShectmanO. (2010). Validation of driving simulators. Advances in Transportation Studies, December Special edition, 53–62.
42.
SipersteinG. N.ParkerR. C.DrascherM. (2013). National snapshot of adults with intellectual disabilities in the labor force. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 39(3), 157–165.
43.
SpiethP. M.KubaschA. S.PenzlinA. I.IlligensB. M.BarlinnK.SiepmannT. (2016). Randomized control trials: A matter of design. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s101938
44.
UngewissJ.KüblerT.SippelK.AehlingK.HeisterM.RosenstielW.…PapageorgiouE. (2018). Agreement of driving simulator and on-road driving performance in patients with binocular visual field loss. Graefe’s Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 256(12), 2429–2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4148-9
45.
Von BrockM. B.ElliottS. N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(87)90022-7
46.
WakemanS.KarvonenM.AhumadaA. (2013). Changing instruction to increase achievement for students with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(2), 6–13.
47.
WallnerT. (1974). Mental retardation and the mentally retarded as driving license applicants. Lakartidningen, 71, 3041–3042.
48.
WellekS.BlettnerM. (2012). On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: Part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 109(15), 276–281.
49.
WoleryM.GastD. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77.
