Teacher Self-Efficacy for Teaching Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Associations with Stress,Teacher Engagement,and Student IEP Outcomes Following COMPASS Consultation

Abstract

Although teachers reporting high teaching self-efficacy demonstrate positive teaching behaviors, minimal stress, and superior classroom management techniques, surprisingly few studies have demonstrated a relationship between teacher self-efficacy and student outcomes. This study explored self-efficacy specific to teaching students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and examined relationships with stress, teacher engagement, and student individualized education program (IEP) outcomes. Special education teachers (N = 44) were recruited as part of a larger study examining a consultation intervention. Results indicated that self-efficacy for teaching students with ASD was significantly and positively correlated with teacher engagement and student outcomes, and negatively correlated with teacher stress. Furthermore, teachers who received the consultation intervention reported higher levels of self-efficacy for teaching students with ASD. This is the first study to report a direct association between teacher self-efficacy and student IEP outcomes and the potential positive impact of a teacher consultation intervention on the teacher intrapersonal factor of self-efficacy.

Keywords

teacher self-efficacy autism spectrum disorder teacher stress teacher engagement social cognitive theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

Greene

Konold

(2004). Index of teaching stress. Florida Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Allinder

R. M.

(1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 247–254.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

Anderman

Klassen

(2015). Being a teacher: Efficacy, emotions, and interpersonal relationships in classroom settings. In Corno

Anderman

E. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 402–414). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Bandura

(2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Pajares

Urdan

(Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte: NC: Information Age Publishing.

Coladarci

Breton

W. A.

(1997). Teacher efficacy, supervision, and the special education resource-room teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 230–239.

Fives

Buehl

M. M.

(2008). What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 134–176.

Gaasterland

C. M.

Jansen-van der Weide

M. C.

Weinreich

S. S.

van der Lee

J. H.

(2016). A systematic review to investigate the measurement properties of goal attainment scaling, towards use in drug trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), Article 99.

10.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. (2004). Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2C

11.

Jennett

H. K.

Harris

S. L.

Mesibov

G. B.

(2003). Commitment to philosophy, teacher efficacy, and burnout among teachers of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 583–593.

12.

Kiresuk

T. J.

Sherman

R. E.

(1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453. doi:10.1007/BF01530764

13.

Kiresuk

T. J.

Smith

Cardillo

J. E.

(1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Klassen

R. M.

Tze

V. M.

(2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76.

15.

Klassen

R. M.

Tze

V. M.

Betts

S. M.

Gordon

K. A.

(2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21–43.

16.

Klassen

R. M.

Yerdelen

Durksen

T. L.

(2013). Measuring teacher engagement: Development of the engaged teachers scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 33–52.

17.

Lord

Risi

Lambrecht

Cook

E. H.

Leventhal

B. L.

DiLavore

P. C.

. . . Rutter

(2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205–223.

18.

National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

19.

Pajares

(1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

20.

Ross

J. A.

(1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51–65. doi:10.2307/1495395

21.

Ruble

L. A.

Dalrymple

N. J.

McGrew

J. H.

(2010). The effects of consultation on individualized education program outcomes for young children with autism: The collaborative model for promoting competence and success. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 286–301. doi:10.1177/1053815110382973

22.

Ruble

L. A.

Dalrymple

N. J.

McGrew

J. H.

(2012). Collaborative model for promoting competence and success of students with autism. New York, NY: Springer.

23.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

(2013). Teacher and child predictors of achieving IEP goals of children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2748–2763.

24.

Ruble

McGrew

J. H.

Toland

M. D.

(2012). Goal attainment scaling as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1974–1983. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1446-7

25.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

Toland

Dalrymple

Adams

Snell-Rood

(2018). Randomized control trial of COMPASS for improving transition outcomes of students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3623-9

26.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

Toland

M. D.

Dalrymple

N. J.

Jung

L. A.

(2013). A randomized controlled trial of COMPASS web-based and face-to-face teacher coaching in autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 566–572.

27.

Ruble

L. A.

Toland

M. D.

Birdwhistell

J. L.

McGrew

J. H.

Usher

E. L.

(2013). Preliminary study of the autism self-efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET). Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1151–1159. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.06.006

28.

Ruble

L. A.

Usher

E. L.

McGrew

J. H.

(2011). Preliminary investigation of the sources of self-efficacy among teachers of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 67–74.

29.

Segall

M. J.

Campbell

J. M.

(2014). Factors influencing the educational placement of students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 31–43.

30.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Skaalvik

(2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114, 68–77.

31.

Tefera

Thorius

K. K.

Artiles

A. J.

(2014). Teacher influences in the racialization of disabilities. In Milner

H. R.

Lomotey

(Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education (pp. 256–270). New York, NY: Routledge.

32.

Usher

E. L.

Pajares

(2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.

33.

White

M. L.

Smith

J. D.

Smith

T. E. C.

Stodden

(2012). Autism spectrum disorders. In Zager

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Simpson

R. L.

(Eds.), Educating students with autism spectrum disorders (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Routledge.

34.

Zee

Koomen

H. M.

(2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86, 981–1015.