Instructional Practices,Priorities,and Preparedness for Educating Students With Autism and Intellectual Disability

Abstract

Improving educational outcomes for students with autism and intellectual disability requires delivering services and supports marked by evidence-based practices. We surveyed 535 special educators of students with autism and/or intellectual disability about (a) their implementation of 26 instructional practices, (b) their recent access to training and resources on those practices, (c) the factors they consider when deciding which practices to use, (d) the importance they place on various instructional areas (e.g., social skills, reading), and (e) their preparedness to provide that instruction. Although teachers reported implementing a wide range of evidence-based instructional practices, their recent access to training and resources was fairly limited. Special educators identified a constellation of factors informing their instructional decision making, placing emphasis on student needs and professional judgment. When considering instructional areas, a gap was evident between ratings of importance and preparedness. We address implications for strengthening professional development pathways and offer recommendations for future research.

Keywords

evidence-based practices teacher preparation instructional decision making severe disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biggs

E. E.

Carter

E. W.

(2016). Quality of life for transition-age youth with autism or intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 190–204.

Borders

C. M.

Bock

S. J.

Szymanski

(2015). Teacher ratings of evidence-based practices from the field of autism. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20, 91–100. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu033

Boynton

(2012). Facilitated communication—What harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6, 3–13.

Brock

M. E.

Huber

H. B.

Carter

E. W.

Juarez

A. P.

Warren

Z. E.

(2014). Statewide assessment of professional development needs related to educating students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29, 67–79. doi:10.1177/1088357614522290

Browder

D. M.

Wood

Thompson

Ribuffo

(2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC-3). Retrieved from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IC-3_FINAL_03-03-15.pdf

Cameron

D. L.

Cook

B. G.

(2013). General education teachers’ goals and expectations for their included students with mild and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 18–30.

Carnine

(1995). Trustworthiness, useability, and accessibility of educational research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 251–258. doi:10.1007/BF02110314

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cook

B. G.

Odom

S. L.

(2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144. doi:10.1177/001440291307900201

10.

Cook

B. G.

Tankersley

Cook

Landrum

T. J.

(2008). Evidence-based practices in special education: Some practical considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2), 69–75. doi:10.1177/1053451208321452

11.

Greenway

McCollow

Hudson

R. F.

Peck

Davis

C. A.

(2013). Autonomy and accountability: Teacher perspectives on evidence-based practice and decision-making for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 456–468.

12.

Hall

L. J.

(2015). Sustaining evidence-based practices by graduated special educators of students with ASD: Creating a community of practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38, 28–43. doi:10.1177/0888406414558883

13.

Hess

K. L.

Morrier

M. J.

Heflin

L. J.

Ivey

M. L.

(2008). Autism Treatment Survey: Services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 961–971. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0470-5

14.

Heward

W. L.

(2003). Ten faulty notions about teaching and learning that hinder the effectiveness of special education. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 186–205.

15.

Jones

M. L.

(2009). A study of novice special educators’ views of evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 101–120. doi:10.1177/0888406409333777

16.

Lang

Tostanoski

A. H.

Travers

Todd

(2014). The only study investigating the rapid prompting method has serious methodological flaws but data suggest the most likely outcome is prompt dependency. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8, 40–48.

17.

Morrier

M. J.

Hess

K. L.

Heflin

L. J.

(2011). Teacher training for implementation of teaching strategies for students with autism spectrum disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 119–132. doi:10.1177/0888406410376660

18.

National Autism Center. (2008). National Standards Project. Randolph, MA: Author. Retrieved from https://mn.gov/mnddc/asd-employment/pdf/09-NSR-NAC.pdf

19.

Schieve

L. A.

Clayton

H. B.

Durkin

M. S.

Wingate

M. S.

Drews-Botsch

(2015). Comparison of perinatal risk factors associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Intellectual Disability (ID), and co-occurring ASD and ID. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2361–2372. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2402-0

20.

Shurr

Bouck

E. C.

(2013). Research on curriculum for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability: A systematic review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 76–87.

21.

Simpson

R. L.

(2005). Evidence-based practices and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 140–149.

22.

Todd

(2016). Old horses in new stables: Rapid prompting, facilitated communication, science, ethics, and the history of magic. In Foxx

R. M.

Mulick

J. A.

(Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 372–409). New York, NY: Routledge.

23.

Tostanoski

Lang

Raulston

Carnett

Davis

(2014). Voices from the past: Comparing the rapid prompting method and facilitated communication. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 219–223. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.749952

24.

Wong

Odom

S. L.

Hume

Cox

A. W.

Fettig

Kucharczyk

. . . Schultz

T. R.

(2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB