A review of the literature was conducted for articles published between 2003 and 2010 to build a case for the degree to which evidence-based practices were documented for teaching academic skills to students with severe developmental disabilities. This review extended earlier comprehensive work in literacy, mathematics, and science for the population in question. A total of 18 studies met the Horner et al. (2005) quality indicator criteria. In general, time delay and task analytic instruction were found to be evidence-based practices. In addition, specific target responses were defined to show academic learning, with the most prevalent target responses being discrete responses; the type of systematic prompting and feedback used most often was time delay, while the component used least often was stimulus fading/shaping; and teaching formats used most often were massed trials and one-to-one instruction.
*AyresK. M.LangoneJ.BoonR. T.NormanA. (2006). Computer-based instruction for purchasing skills. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 253–263.
2.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 197–207.
3.
BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
4.
BrowderD. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching language arts, math, and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
6.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HarrisA.WakemanS. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407–432.
7.
*BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
8.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
9.
ChardD. J.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.BakerS. K.DoablerC.ApichatabutraC. (2009). Repeated reading interventions for students with learning disabilities: Status of the evidence. Exceptional Children, 75, 263–281.
10.
*CihakD.AlbertoP. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89–99. doi:10.1177/10883576060210020601.
11.
CipaniE. C.SpoonerF. (1994). Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
CollinsB. C. (Ed.). (2007). Moderate and severe disabilities: A foundational approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
*CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040401.
14.
CookB. G.SchirmerB. R. (2003). What’s special about special education? Overview and analysis. Journal of Special Education, 37, 200–205. doi:10.1177/00224669030370031001.
15.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.Harjusola-WebbS. (2008). Evidence-based special education and professional wisdom: Putting it all together. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 69–75. doi:10.1177/1053451208321566.
16.
CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75, 365–383.
17.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
18.
*CourtadeG. R.BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.DiBiaseW. (2010) Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378–399.
19.
CourtadeG.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2007). Review of studies with students with significant cognitive disabilities which link to science standards. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 43–49.
20.
Criteria for Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education. (2005). [Special Issue]. Exceptional Children, 71(2).
21.
*DiPipi-HoyC.JitendraA. (2004). A parent-delivered intervention to teach purchasing skills to young adults with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 38, 144–157. doi:10.1177/00224669040380030201
22.
Evidence-based practices for reading, math, writing, and behavior [Special Issue]. Exceptional Children, 75(3).
23.
*FalkenstineK. J.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.KleinertH. (2009). Presenting chained and discrete tasks as non-targeted information when teaching discreet academic skills through small group instruction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 127–142.
24.
FarlowL. J.SnellM. E. (2006). Teaching self-care skills. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed., pp. 328–374). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
25.
GerstenR.FuchsL.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
26.
*HansenD. L.MorganR. L. (2008). Teaching grocery store purchasing skills to students with intellectual disabilities using a computer-based instruction program. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 431–442.
27.
*HetzroniO. E.ShalemU. (2005). From logos to orthographic symbols: A multilevel fading computer program for teaching nonverbal children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 201–212. doi:10.1177/10883576050200040201
28.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.
29.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-466, 20 U. S. C. §1400, H. R. 1350.
30.
*JamesonJ. M.McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.RiesenT.PolychronisS. (2007). A comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in the general education classroom and one-to-one massed practice instruction in the special education classroom. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 23–44.
31.
*JamesonJ. M.McDonnellJ.PolychronisS.RiesenT. (2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 346–363. doi:10.1352/2008.46.346-363
32.
*JimenezB. A.BrowderD. M.CourtadeG. R. (2008). Teaching an algebraic equation to high school students with moderate developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 266–274.
33.
JohnstonJ. M.PennypackerH. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
KauffmanJ. M. (1996). Research to practice issues. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 55–60.
35.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ShepcaroJ. C. (2009). An examination of the evidence base for functional-based interventions for students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders attending middle and high schools. Exceptional Children, 75, 321–340.
36.
*McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RiesenT.JamesonM.KercherK. (2006). Comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in general education classes with small group instruction in special education classes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 125–138.
37.
McDonnellJ. J.O’NeillR. (2003). A perspective on single/within subject research methods and “scientifically based research.”Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 138–142.
38.
*MechlingL. C. (2004). Effects of multi-media, computer-based instruction on grocery shopping fluency. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 23–34.
39.
*MechlingL. C.GastD. L.KrupaK. (2007). Impact of SMART Board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1869–1882. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0361-9
40.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
41.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services [NIH Pub. No. 00-4754].
42.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115, § 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq. (2002).
45.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
46.
*PolychronisS. C.McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.RiesenT.JamesonM. (2004). A comparison of two trial distribution schedules in embedded instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 140–151. doi:10.1177/10883576040190030201
47.
*RiesenT.McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.JamesonM. (2003). A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction in general education classes with students with moderate to severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 241–259. doi:10.1023/A:10260764066
48.
SackettD. L.RosenbergW. M. C.GrayJ. A.HaynesB.RichardsonW. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t: It’s about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
49.
SmithA. (2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 126–132.
50.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
51.
SnellM. E.GastD. L. (1981). Applying time delay procedure to the instruction of the severely handicapped. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 3–14.
52.
SontagE.BurkeP.YorkR. (1973). Considerations for serving the severely handicapped in the public schools. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 8, 20–26.
53.
SpoonerF. (Ed.). (2003). Perspective on defining scientifically based research. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities [Special issue], 28(3).
54.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2003). Scientifically based research in education and students with low incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 117–125.
55.
SpoonerF.BrownF. (2011). Educating students with significant cognitive disabilities: Historical overviews and future projections. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 503–515). New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
SpoonerF.KnightV.BrowderD. M.JimenezB.DiBiaseW. (in press). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities.
57.
SpoonerF.TestD. W. (1994). Domestic and community living skills. In CipaniE. C.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilities (pp. 149–183). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
SpoonerF.WoodW. M. (2004). Teaching personal care and hygiene skills. In WehmanP.KregelJ. (Eds.), Functional curriculum for elementary, middle, & secondary age students with special needs (2nd ed., pp. 317–356). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
59.
TankersleyM.Harjusola-WebbS.LandrumT. J. (2008). Using single-subject research to establish the evidence base of special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 83–90. doi:10.1177/1053451208321600
60.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
61.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. MWhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KortingL. (2009). Evidence-based practice in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115-128. doi: 10.1177/0885728809336859
62.
TouchetteP. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 223–232.
63.
*Tucker CohenE.Wolff HellerK.AlbertoP.FredrickR. D. (2008). Using a three-step decoding strategy with constant time delay to teach word reading to students with mild and moderate mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 67–78. doi:10.1177/1088357608314899
64.
VaughnS.DammannJ. E. (2001). Science and sanity in special education. Behavior Disorder, 27, 21–29.
65.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2009). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
