We evaluated the ability of typical school personnel with basic behavioral training to develop and implement function-based supports for students with mild to moderate problem behaviors. Descriptive results indicated that following four 1-hr training sessions, 13 participants were able to (a) identify interventions that were and were not functionally related to problem behavior and (b) lead school-based teams in developing function-based supports that were rated as technically sound by external behavior analysts. Data resulting from a non-concurrent multiple baseline analysis across five of the trained professionals, each working with a team to address the problem behavior of one elementary school student, indicated that plan implementation occurred with high fidelity and was functionally related to decreases in problem behavior and increases in academic engagement. In addition, school personnel rated the training, tools, and implementation process as effective and efficient. Limitations and implications of these results are discussed.
BenazziL.NakayamaN.SterlingL.KiddK.AlbinR. (2003). Function-based support: Current practices and research findings. Eugene: The Oregon Conference.
2.
BloodE.NeelR. S. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 67–80.
3.
Browning-WrightD.MayerR. G.CookC. R.CrewsS. D.KraemerB. R.GaleB. (2007). A preliminary study on the effects of training using behavior support plan quality evaluation guide (BSP-QE) to improve Positive Behavioral Support Plans. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(3), 89–106.
4.
CarterD.HornerR. H. (2009). Adding function-based behavioral support to First Step to Success: Integrating individualized and manualized practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 22–34.
5.
ConroyM. A.AlterP. J.ScottT. M. (2009). Functional behavior assessment and students with emotional/behavioral disorders: When research, policy, and practice collide. In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Policy and practice: Advances in learning and behavior disabilities (Vol. 22, pp. 133–167). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
6.
ConroyM. A.DunlapG.ClarkeS.AlterP. J. (2005). A descriptive analysis of behavioral intervention research with young children with challenging behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25, 157–166.
7.
CookC. R.CrewsS. D.Browning-WrightD.MayerG. R.GaleB.KreamerB.GreshamF. M. (2007). Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavior support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 191–206.
8.
CookC. R.MayerG. R.Browning WrightD.KraemerB.WallaceM. D.CollinsT.. . . RestoriA. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 3–16.
9.
CroneD. A.HornerR. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
DucharmeJ. M.SchecterC. (2011). Bridging the gap between clinical and classroom intervention: Keystone approaches for students with challenging behavior. School Psychology Review, 40, 257–274.
11.
HershfeldtP. A.RosenbergM. S.BradshawC. P. (2010). Function-based thinking: A systematic way of thinking about function and its role in changing student behavior problems. Beyond Behavior, 19(3), 12–21.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
13.
HornerR. H.SalentineS.AlbinR. W. (2003). Self-assessment of contextual fit in schools. Eugene: University of Oregon.
14.
IngramK.Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG. (2005). Function-based intervention planning comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 224–236.
15.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
16.
Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA. W.HornerR. H.SugaiG.SampsonN. (2004). Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.
17.
LomanS. L.HornerR. H. (2014). Examining the efficacy of a basic functional behavioral assessment training package for school personnel. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 18–30. doi:10.1177/1098300712470724
18.
MarchR. E.HornerR. H.Lewis-PalmerT.BrownD.CroneD.ToddA. W.CarrE. G. (2000). Functional Assessment Checklist: Teachers and Staff (FACTS). Eugene, OR: Educational and Community Supports.
19.
MarquisJ. G.HornerR. H.CarrE. G.TurnbullA. P.ThompsonM.BehrensG. A.. . . DoolabhA. (2000). A meta-analysis of positive behavior support. In GerstonR. M.SchillerE. P. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 137–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
NewcomerL. L.LewisT. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.
21.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
22.
RenshawT.ChristensenL.MarchantM.AndersonT. (2008). Training elementary school general educators to implement function-based support. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, 495–521.
23.
ScottT. M.AlterP. J.McQuillanK. (2010). Functional behavior assessment in classroom settings: Scaling down to scale up. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 87–94.
24.
ScottT. M.LiaupsinC.NelsonC. M.McIntyreJ. (2005). Team-based functional behavior assessment as a proactive public school process: A descriptive analysis of current barriers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 57–71.
25.
Strickland-CohenM. K.LomanS.BorgmeierC. (2012). From basic FBA to BSP participant’s guide. Eugene: University of Oregon.
26.
SugaiG.Lewis-PalmerT. L.ToddA. W.HornerR. H. (2001). School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET). Eugene, OR: Educational and Community Supports. Available from http://www.pbis.org
27.
Van AckerR.BoresonL.GableR. A.PottertonT. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 35–56.
28.
WalkerH. M.HornerR. H.SugaiG.BullisM.SpragueJ. R.BrickerD.KaufmanM. J. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209.
