Within the context of a multiple baseline design, the researchers in this investigation used a constant time delay (CTD) procedure to teach two classroom support personnel (i.e., paraprofessional, peer tutor) to use a simultaneous prompting (SP) procedure when teaching a high school student with a moderate intellectual disability to (a) identify words from science core content, (b) identify words from social studies core content, (c) make Kool-Aid, and (d) alphabetize last names by their first letters. The classroom teacher implemented the CTD procedure with a high degree of fidelity, the paraprofessional and the peer tutor implemented the SP procedure with high levels of fidelity, and the student increased his ability to perform the targeted skills.
AyresK.LedfordJ. (2014). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 124–153). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BerrongA. K.SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.CollinsB. C. (2007). The effects of response cards on active participation and social behavior of students with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 19, 187–199.
3.
BillingsleyF. F.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: Rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
4.
BrownF.SnellM. E. (2011). Measuring student behavior and learning. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 186–223). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5.
Causton-TheoharisJ. N.MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Building bridges: Strategies to help paraprofessionals promote peer interactions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 18–24.
6.
CollinsB. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
7.
CollinsB. C.BransonT. A.HallM. (1995). Teaching generalized reading of cooking product labels to adolescents with mental disabilities through the use of key words taught by peer tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 65–75.
8.
CollinsB. C.BransonT. A.HallM.RankinS. W. (2001). Teaching secondary students with moderate disabilities in an inclusive academic classroom setting. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13, 41–59.
9.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special education and general education setting. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233.
10.
CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.GallowayC. C. (2011). The addition of functional content during core content instruction with students with moderate disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 46, 22–39.
11.
CollinsB. C.HallM.BransonT. A. (1997). Teaching leisure skills to adolescents with moderate disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 499–512.
12.
CollinsB. C.HallM.BransonT. A.HolderM. (1999). Acquisition of related and nonrelated nontargeted information presented by a teacher within an inclusive setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 223–237.
13.
Creech-GallowayC.CollinsB. C.KnightV.BauschM. E. (2014). Using simultaneous prompting with an iPad to teach the Pythagorean Theorem to adolescents with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 222–232.
14.
FetkoE. E.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.SchusterJ. W.SpriggsA. (2013). Using peer tutors and a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach a leisure skill to students with disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 400–411.
15.
FetkoK. S.SchusterJ. W.HarleyD. A.CollinsB. C. (1999). Using simultaneous prompting to teach a chained vocational task to young adults with severe intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 318–329.
16.
FickelK.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C. (1998). The effectiveness of simultaneous prompting with a small heterogeneous group of middle school students when taught different tasks using different stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 219–244.
17.
FiscusR.SchusterJ. W.MorseT.CollinsB. C. (2002). Teaching elementary students with cognitive disabilities food preparation skills while embedding instructive feedback in the prompt and consequent event. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 55–69.
18.
GastD. L.AultM. J.WoleryM.DoyleP. M.BelangerS. (1988). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching sight word reading to students with moderate mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 117–128.
19.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 251–296). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (2002). “That was then, this is now!” Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10, 47–64.
21.
GodseyJ. R.SchusterJ. W.LingoA. S.CollinsB. C.KleinertH. L. (2008). Peer-implemented time delay procedures on the acquisition of chained tasks by students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 111–122.
22.
HarrisonP.OaklandT. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
23.
HeadK. D.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J. (2011). Comparison of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching state capitals. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 182–202. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9127-8
24.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthV. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 214–227.
25.
KarlJ.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J. (2013). Teaching core content embedded in a functional activity to students with moderate cognitive disabilities using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 363–378.
26.
MaciagK. G.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C.CooperJ. T. (2000). Training adults with moderate and severe mental retardation in a vocational skill using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 306–316.
27.
McDonnellJ. (1987). The effects of time delay and increasing prompt hierarchy strategies on the acquisition of purchasing skills by students with severe handicaps. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 12, 227–236.
28.
McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.RisenT. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363–377.
29.
MiracleS. A.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W.Grisham-BrownJ. (2001). Peer-versus teacher-delivered instruction: Effects on acquisition and maintenance. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 373–385.
30.
NormanJ. M.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W. (2001). Using video prompting and modeling to teach self-help skills to elementary students with mental disabilities in a small group. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 5–18.
31.
PalmerT.CollinsB. C.SchusterJ. W. (1999). The use of a simultaneous prompting procedure to teach receptive manual sign identification to adults with disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 179–191.
32.
ParrottK. A.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C.GassawayL. J. (2000). Simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback when teaching chained tasks. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 3–19.
33.
PenningtonR.CollinsB. C.StenhoffD. M.TurnerK.GunselmanK. (2014). Using simultaneous prompting to teach generative writing to students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 396–414.
34.
RiesenT.McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.PolychronisS.JamesonM. (2003). A comparison of constant time delay and simultaneous prompting within embedded instruction in general education classes with students with moderate to severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 241–259.
35.
RiggsL.CollinsB. C.KleinertH.KnightV. (2013). Teaching principles of heredity to high school students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 30–43.
36.
SewardJ.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J.CollinsB. C.HallM. (2014). Comparing simultaneous prompting and constant time delay to teach leisure skills to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 381–395.
37.
SingletonD. K.SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.CollinsB. C. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery sight words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 182–199.
38.
SingletonK. C.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J. (1995). Simultaneous prompting in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 218–230.
39.
SmithB. R.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB.KleinertH. (2011). Using simultaneous prompting to teach restaurant words and classifications as non-target information to secondary students with moderate to severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 251–266.
40.
StonecipherE. L.SchusterJ. W.CollinsB. C.Grisham-BrownJ. (1999). Teaching gift wrapping skills in a quadruple instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 139–158.
41.
SuterJ. C.GiangrecoM. F. (2009). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 81–93.
42.
Tekin-IftarE. (2003). Effectiveness of peer delivered simultaneous prompting on teaching community signs to students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 77–94.
43.
Tekin-IftarE.Kircaali-IftarG. (2002). Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two response prompting procedures delivered by sibling tutors. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 27, 283–299.
44.
WallM. E.GastD. L. (1997). Caregivers as teachers: Using constant time delay to teach adults how to use constant time delay. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 213–228.
45.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition. Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
