Over the past decade, there has been a dramatic increase in litigation regarding the education of students With autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Because of the complexity of ASD and the costs of litigation related to the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, ASD has become a high-stakes issue for parents and school districts. The purpose of this article is to extrapolate principles from the ASD litigation to provide guidelines to assist Individualized Education Program teams in developing appropriate special education programs for students With ASD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baird, M.M. (1999). Legal issues in autism. In Proceedings of the 20th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities. Alexandria, VA: LRP Publications.
2.
Barnett v. Fairfax County School Board, 927 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1991).
3.
Bartlett, L.D., Weisenstein, G.R., & Etscheidt, S. (2002). Successful inclusion for educational leaders. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
4.
Bateman, B.D., & Linden, M.A. (1998). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs (3rd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
5.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
6.
Boomer, L.W., & Garrison-Harrell, L. (1995). Legal issues concerning children with autism and pervasive developmental disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 21(1), 53— 61.
7.
Clark, S.G. (1999). Assessing IEPs for IDEA compliance. West's Education Law Report, 137, 35—42.
8.
Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District v. Michael F., 118 F.3d 245 (5th Cir. 1997).
9.
Eyer, T.L. (1998). Greater expectations: How the 1997 IDEA amendments raise the basic floor of opportunity for children with disabilities. West's Education Law Report, 126, 1—19.
10.
Gorn, S. (1996). What's hot, what's not: Trends in special education law. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
11.
Gorn, D. (1999). What do I do when . . . The answer book on special education law. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
12.
Gresham, F., Beebe-Frankenberger, M., & MacMillan, D. (1999). A selective review of treatments for autism: Description and methodological considerations. School Psychology Review , 28, 559—575.
13.
Heflin, L.J., & Simpson, R. (1998). Interventions for children and youth with autism: Prudent choices in a world of exaggerated claims and empty promise. Part II: Legal/policy analysis and recommendations for selecting interventions and treatments. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities , 13, 212—220.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 et seq.
16.
JSK v. Hendry School Board, 941 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1991).
17.
Lachman v. Illinois State Board of Education852 F.2d 290 (7th Cir. 1988).
18.
Lake, S. (2002). The top 10 IEP errors: How to avoid them, how to fix them. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications .
19.
Letter to Anonymous, 30 IDELR 705 (OSEP 1998).
20.
Osborne, A.G. (1992). Legal standards for an appropriate education in the post-Rowley era. Exceptional Children, 58, 488—494.
21.
Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16, 853 F.2d 171 (3rd Cir. 1988).
22.
Roth, J.A. (2000). Introduction. In L. T. Booth, J. Donnelly, & J. L. Horton (Eds.), Serving students with autism: A legal perspective. Wayne, PA: Oakstone Legal & Business Publishing.
23.
S. REP. NO. 106-17, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. 28—29, 1997. Available from http://www. gpo.gov
24.
Soraruf v. Pickney Community Schools , 208 F.3d 215 (6th Cir. 2000).
25.
U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Eleventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Womack, R.R. (2002). Autism and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Are autistic children receiving appropriate treatment in our schools? Texas TechLaw Review, 34(1),189—235.
28.
Yell, M.L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
29.
Yell, M.L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. The Journal of Special Education , 33, 206—215.
30.
Zirkel, P.A. (2001). Autism and the law: Rulings and expert analysis . Horsham, PA: LRP Publications .
31.
Zirkel, P.A. (2002). The autism case law: Administrative and judicial rulings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities , 17, 84—93.
