The network of off-system bridges supporting the rural economy has been a concern for a long time. Federal Highway Administration data show that 31.4% of the bridges off the federal aid system qualify for replacement and/or rehabilitation funds, the worst category under the federal bridge program. Although there is some evidence that the quality of these bridges has marginally improved in recent years, the sheer number of deficient bridges in rural areas necessitates major expenses for rural local governments in the future. Study results suggest, however, that local highway officials expect to be able to spend far less than what they believe the system requires. The outcome is that part of the transportation backbone of the rural economy is at risk, and additional sources of revenue and/or alternative means for reinvesting in the bridge network are needed.
AndreassenA. E.BermanJ. M. (1994). Infrastructure alternatives for 2005: Employment and occupations. Monthly Labor Review, 117(4), 22–28.
3.
AschauerD. A. (1989a). Is public expenditure productive?Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177–200.
4.
AschauerD. A. (1989b). Public investment and productivity growth in the group of seven. Economic Perspectives, 13, 17–25.
5.
ChoateP.WalterS. (1981). America in ruins: Beyond the public works pork barrel. Washington, DC: Council of State Planning Agencies.
6.
DellerS. C. (1991). Economic and social outcomes of public and private investment in physical infrastructure for growth and stability of rural Economics. In Economic productivity and adaptability (Publication No. 60). University Park: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development, Pennsylvania State University.
7.
DellerS. C.WalzerN. (1993, April). The role of public services in the quality of life of rural Illinois residents. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Southern Regional Science Association, Washington, DC.
8.
DellerS. C.WalzerN. (1997). Rural roads & bridges: A comprehensive analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Transportation.
9.
Duffy-DenoK.EbertsR. (1989). Public infrastructure and regional economic development: A simultaneous equations approach (Working Paper No. 8909). Cleveland, OH: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
10.
ForkenbrockD. T.PogueT. F.FinneganD. J.FosterN.S.J. (1990). Transportation investment to promote economic development. In Infrastructure investment and economic development: Strategies for the 1990's. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
11.
HalsteadJ. M.DellerS. C. (1997). Public infrastructure in economic development and growth: Evidence from rural manufacturers. Journal of the Community Development Society, 28(2), 149–169.
12.
HenryM. S.SingletaryL.BrooksK.LondonJ.RocheM. (1989, November). Evaluating the economic development effects of highway investments: Some thoughts on experimental design for South Carolina. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Science Association, Santa Barbara, CA.
13.
Holtz-EakinD. (1994). Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 12–21.
14.
HultenC.PetersonG. E. (1984). The public capital stock: Needs, trends and performances. American Economic Review, 74, 166–173.
15.
HultenC.SchwabR. (1991). Public capital formation and the growth of regional manufacturing industries. National Tax Journal, 44(4), 121–134.
16.
Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs/National Association of Counties/National Association of County Engineers. (1994). Survey of county highway officials [Machine-readable data file]. Macomb: Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs [Producer and Distributor].
17.
JohnsonT. G. (1990). The economic impact of infrastructure development. Blacksburg: Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
18.
MunnellA. (1990, January/February). Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review, 3–22.
19.
National Council on Public Works Improvement (NCPWI). (1988). Fragile foundations: A report on America's public works. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
SearsD. W.RowleyT. D.ReidJ. N. (1990). Infrastructure investment and economic development: An overview. In Infrastructure investment and economic development: Strategies for the 1990's. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
21.
SteinnesD. N. (1990). An analysis of infrastructure provision and local economic development policy. Journal of the Community Development Society, 21, 33–53.
22.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census. (1992). 1990 Census of Population and Housing (Summary Tape File 3A) [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
23.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census. (1996). 1992 Census of Governments, Finance Statistics (preliminary) Individual Unit Records [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
24.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Measurement Division. (1996). Regional economic information system 1969–94 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
25.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1983). 1982 highway statistics (Tables MF-3, HM-10; pp. 64, 113). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
26.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1984). 1983 highway statistics (Tables LF-1, p. 93). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1988). 1987 highway statistics (Tables HM-10, p. 112). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1989a). 1988 highway statistics (Tables LF-1, p. 95). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1989b). National bridge inventory, 1989 [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1993). 1992 highway statistics (Tables MF-3, HM-10; pp. 84, 141). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1994a). 1993 highway statistics (Tables LGF-1, p. 90). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1994b). National bridge inventory 1994, [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1995, June). The status of the nation's highway bridges: Highway bridge replacement and rehabilitation program and national bridge inventory. Washington. DC: Author.
34.
WalzerN.ChicoineD. L. (1989). Rural roads and bridges: A dilemma for local officials. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Transportation.
35.
WalzerN.DellerS. C. (1993). Federal aid and local transportation infrastructure spending: A review of the 1980s. Policy Studies Journal, 21(2), 309–324.
