This research note compares the effect on willingness to raise taxes and government fees of three common approaches to public consultation: (a) a telephone survey with no information or discussion, (b) a focus group with discussion but no information relating need to the proposed tax or fee, and (c) a focus group with discussion and such information. Our purpose is twofold: (a) illustrate the contribution of pertinent information to public acceptance of tax or fee increases, and (b) suggest a more comprehensive and informative approach to consultation with the public. We do so using the examples of raising the gas tax and vehicle registration fees. The results show that the combination of information and discussion produces the greatest level of support for both revenue enhancing options. Implications for presenting proposals to raise taxes and fees are discussed.
AgrawalA. S.NixonH.MurthyV. (2013). What do Americans think about federal tax options to support public transit, highways, and local streets and roads? Results from year 3 of a national survey. Presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January.
2.
BeckettJ.KingC. S. (2002). The challenge to improve citizen participation in public budgeting: A discussion. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, & Financial Management, 14, 463-485.
3.
BurbyR. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 33-49.
4.
CheckowayB. (1981). The politics of public hearings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 566-582.
5.
ConnorD. M. (1988). A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77, 249-257.
6.
CrabbeA. E.HiattR.PoliwkaS. D.WachsM. (2005). Local transportation sales taxes: California’s experiment in transportation finance. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25, 91-121.
7.
CrosbyN.KellyJ. M.SchaeferP. (1986). Citizen panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46, 170-178.
8.
EbdonC. (2002). Beyond the public hearing: Citizen participation in the local government budget process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, & Financial Management, 14, 273-294.
9.
EbdonC.FranklinA. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66, 437-447.
10.
Federal Highway Administration, National Research Council & Transportation Research Board. (2005). Transportation finance: Meeting the funding challenge today, shaping policies for tomorrow. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
FischerF. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Science, 26, 165-187.
12.
FoxC. J.MillerH. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
FranklinA. L.HoA. T.EbdonC. (2009). Participatory budgeting in midwestern states: Democratic connection or citizen disconnection?Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(3), 52-73.
14.
GundryK. G.HeberleinT. A. (1984). Do public meetings represent the public?Journal of the American Planning Association, 50, 175-182.
15.
GuoH. D.NeshkovaM. I. (2013). Citizen input in the budget process: When does it matter most?American Review of Public Administration, 43, 331-346.
16.
HamidehA.OhJ. E.LabiS.ManneringF. (2008). Public acceptance of local government transportation sales taxes: A statistical assessment. State and Local Government Review, 40, 150-159.
17.
HannaK. S. (2000). The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information: A case study. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 398-410.
18.
HannayR.WachsM. (2007). Factors influencing support for local transportation sales tax measures. Transportation, 34, 17-35.
19.
HartmanD.HackbartM.YusufJ.-E.WallaceC. Y. (2005). Meeting Kentucky’s transportation needs and priorities: Citizens’ perceptions and recommendations. Lexington: Kentucky Transportation Center.
20.
HarwoodR. D. (1991). Citizens and politics: A view from main street America. Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation.
21.
HathawayJ.WormserL. (1993). Working with new partners: Transportation decisions with the public. Transportation Research Record, 1400, 36-40.
22.
KathleneL.MartinJ. (1991). Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 46-63.
23.
KingC. S.FelteyK. M.SuselB. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58, 317-326.
24.
MatsusakaJ. G. (2010). A case study on direct democracy: Have voter initiatives paralyzed the California budget? The book of the states 2010. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
25.
MiddendorfG.BuschL. (1997). Inquiry for the public good: Democratic participation in agricultural research. Agriculture and Human Value, 14, 45-57.
26.
National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission. (2009). Paying our own way: A new framework for transportation finance. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
NeshkovaM. I.GuoH. D. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 267-288.
28.
O’ConnellL.YusufJ.-E. (2011). An information model to present proposals to increase taxes: Two examples in the context of American values. International Journal of Public Administration, 34, 180-189.
29.
O’ConnellL.YusufJ.-E. (2013). Improving revenue adequacy by indexing the gas tax to indicators of need: A simulation analysis. Public Works Management & Policy, 18, 229-243.
30.
PuentesR.PrinceR. (2003). Fueling transportation finance: A primer on the gas tax. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
31.
ReichR. B. (1990). Public management in a democratic society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
RubinI. (2006). The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending, borrowing and balancing. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
ThomasJ. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Transportation Research Board. (2006). The fuel tax and alternatives for transportation funding: Special report 285. Washington, DC: Committee for the Study of the Long-Term Viability of Fuel Taxes for Transportation Finance, Transportation Research Board.
35.
WalshM. L. (1997). Building citizen involvement: Strategies for local government. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association and the National League of Cities.
36.
YankelovichD. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
37.
YusufJ.-E.O’ConnellL. (2013). The crisis in state highway finances: Its roots, current effects, and some possible remedies. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 25, 502-521.
38.
YusufJ.-E.O’ConnellL.AbutabenjehS. (2011). Paying for locally-owned roads: A crisis in local government highway finance. Public Works Management & Policy, 16, 250-269.
