More and more people are using planes, trains, and automobiles. Traffic congestion plagues both highways and airports, making travel between cities more problematic with the passage of time. Gridlock and winglock are becoming part of American life. High-tech solutions to congestion exist. One is the maglev train, which can reach speeds of up to 300 mph (486 kph). This article examines 2 periods in the last 30 years in which maglev was considered as a possible solution to transportation congestion. However, in both instances, the coupling was not made between problem and solution. It is argued that although technicalfeasibility and economics are crucial, a successful solution requires three political elements: affordability, acceptability, and accessibility. The failure of maglev is explained in terms of the requisite components of a successful solution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumgartner, F. R. , & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bell, L. (1990, May 28). Moynihan skeptical on outcome of national maglev initiative. Traffic World, p. 12-12.
3.
Birnbaum, J. (1990, May 10). High-speed train propelled by magnets attracts "peace dividend" funds and defense contractors. Wall Street Journal, p. A24-A24.
4.
Brooke, J. L. (1995, October 22). Denver is not flying (at least yet) into the future on wings of airport. New York Times, p. 16-16.
5.
Chandler, D. L. (1992a, July 6). Maglev: It's a whole new way to go. Boston Globe, p. 31-31.
6.
Chandler, D. L. (1992b, July 6). Magnetic trains' future is at risk in Congress. Boston Globe, p. 1-1.
7.
Cobb, R. , & Elder, C. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Cohen, L. R. , & Noll, R. G. (1991). The technology pork barrel. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9.
Conn, D. (1991, March 3). High-speed train link to D.C. may get on track. Baltimore Sun, p. ID-ID.
10.
Conroy, D. (1990, May 17). Inside DOT & Transportation Week, p. 4-4.
11.
Copelin, L. (1990, November 28). Experts see highways, railroads in fund fight. Austin American-Statesman, p. 8-8.
12.
Cushman, J. (1990, July 22). U.S. cites limited use for high-speed trains. New York Times, p. 12-12.
13.
deCourcy Hinds, J. (1990, February 26). Pittsburgh urged to revive mills to turn out high-speed trains. New York limes, p. 10A-10A.
14.
Doig, J. , & Hargrove, E. (1987). Leadership and innovation: A biographical perspective on entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Downs, A. (1973). Up and down with ecology-the issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38-50.
16.
Dozier, K. (1990, May 14). Congress levitates over maglev. New Technology Week, p. 1-1.
17.
Duchemin, J. (1990, September 11). Forget about high-tech trains. Journal of Commerce, p. 13-13.
18.
Edelman, M. (1961). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
19.
Ellis, R. (1994). Presidential lightning rods: The politics of blame avoidance. Lawrence, KS: University Press.
20.
Guiver, P. M. (1990). Innovative rail projects. PTI Journal, 16,9-9.
21.
Gilmour, R. , & Lamb, R. (1975). Political alienation in contemporary America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
22.
Hanks, J. , & Lomax, T. (1990). Roadway congestion in major urbanized areas (Res. Rep. No. 1131-3). College Station: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
23.
Heclo, H. (1977). A government of strangers: Executive politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24.
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914-2207.
25.
Itzkoff, D. (1990, September). Washington puts high-speed rail on a fast track. Railway Age, p. 19-19.
26.
Johnson, L. R. (1990, October). An idea whose time has come (finally)?Across the Board, p. 39-39.
27.
Jones, S. V. (1974, June 15). Transit system uses magnetic propulsion. New York Times, p. 39-39.
28.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
29.
Lewis, E. (1980). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic power. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
30.
Loomis, B. (1988). The new American politician: Ambition, entrepreneurship, and the changing face of American life. New York: Basic Books.
31.
McKay, J. (1990, February 24). Study backs high-speed maglev train links. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, p. 17-17.
32.
Money, L. (1984). The saga of maglev. Transportation Research, 4, 333-341.
33.
Moynihan, D. P. (1989, November).How to lose: The story of maglev. Scientific American, 130-130.
34.
Phillips, D. (1990, February 20). High-speed rail backers hope Florida train is bound for glory. Washington Post, p. A8-A8.
35.
Phillips, D. (1991, November 14). High-speed rail seen as way to cut congestion. Washington Post, p. A17-A17.
36.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37.
Sundquist, J. (1968). Politics and policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson years. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
Tomisho, R. (1991, May 28). Texas sets its sights on a bullet train. Wall Street Journal, p. 1B-1B.
39.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (1989). Moving America: Building the national transportation policy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
40.
Vranich, J. (1991). Super-trains: Solutions to America's transportation gridlock. New York: St. Martin's Press.
41.
Wastler, A. (1990, November 7). High-speed rail: Where's the power?Journal of Commerce, p. 7A-7A.
42.
Wenske, P. (1991, June 9). KC part of worldwide push for high-tech trains. Kansas City Star, p. 1-1.
43.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power. Boston: Little, Brown.
44.
Winter, D. (1990, July 23). Senate subcommittee foreshadows highway construction showdown. Traffic World, pp. 40-41.
45.
Woolsey, J. (1990, July). A long-stirring giant is stirring. Air Transport World, pp. 48-52.
