This article argues against privatization and for the use of an existing organizational arrangement, one that may take advantage of private-sector efficiencies while maintaining public accountability. Public authorities are already in widespread use around the nation at all levels of government, yet the utility of the public authority as a middle ground between traditional (bureaucratic) public-sector organizational forms and privatization has yet to be explored systematically. We suggest that the use of public authorities provide additional efficiencies without the loss of accountability (or the imposition of expensive accountability arrangements) often found in privatization arrangements. The theoretical basis of the public authority explores its use as an alternative to privatization and encourages debate among public works scholars and practitioners about the use of alternative organizational arrangements for public works functions. A case illustrates how public authorities are situated to provide market-like benefits while minimizing accountability problems and bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Behn, R. D. (1998). The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountability. International Public Management Journal, 1(2), 131-164.
2.
Blanchard, L. A. , Hinnant, C. C., & Wong, W. (1998). Market-based reforms in government: Toward a social subcontract?Administration & Society, 30(5), 483-512.
3.
Bozeman, B. (1988). Exploring the limits of public and private sectors: Sector boundaries as Maginot Line. Public Administration Review, 48(March/April), 672-674.
4.
Breaux, D. A. , Duncan, C. M., Keller, C. D.,& Morris, J. C. (2002). Welfare reform, Mississippi style: Temporary assistance for needy families and the search for accountability. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 92-103.
5.
Chi, K. (1998). Privatization in state government. Public Administration Review, 58(July/August), 374-375.
6.
Clarke, T. (2003, January). Priming the pump: The emerging debate over water privatization in North America. PA Times, p. 9-9.
7.
Cohen, S. , & Eimicke, W. (1995). The new effective public manager. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Cox, J. L. (1967). Metropolitan water supply: The Denver experience. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.
9.
The Denver Municipal Facts. (1918, August). City and County of Denver, CO: Author.
10.
Doig, J. W. (1983). If I see a murderous fellow sharpening a knife cleverly: The Wilsonian dichotomy and the public authority tradition. Public Administration Review, 43(July/August), 292-304.
11.
Donahue, J. D. (1989). The privatization decision: Public ends, private means. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Ferris, J. M. , & Graddy, E. (1986). Contracting out: For what? With whom?Public Administration Review, 46(July/August), 332-344.
13.
Foster, K. A. (1997). The political economy of special-purpose government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
14.
Gilmour, R. S. ,& Jensen, L. S. (1998). Reinventing government accountability: Public functions, privatization, and the meaning of “state action.”Public Administration Review, 58(May/June), 247-258.
15.
Gortner, H, F. , Mahler, J., & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
16.
Greenough, G. , Eggum, T., Ford, U. G., III, Grigg, N. S., & Sizer, E. (1999). Public works delivery systems in North America: Private and public approaches, including managed competition. Public Works Management & Policy, 4(1), 41-49.
17.
Heilman, J. G. ,& Johnson, G. W. (1992). The politics and economics of privatization: The case of wastewater treatment. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
18.
Hult, K. M. ,& Walcott, C. (1990). Governing public organizations: Politics, structures, and institutional design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
Johnson, G. W. ,& Watson, D. J. (1991). Privatization: Provision or production of services?State and Local Government Review, 23(1), 82-89.
20.
Kolderie, T. (1986). The two different concepts of privatization. Public Administration Review, 46(July/August), 285-290.
21.
Lawther, W. (1996, July). Privatization transfer: Theory and practice. Paper presented at the 57th National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration, Atlanta GA.
22.
Leigland, J. (1994). Public authorities and the determinants of their use by state and local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(October), 521-544.
23.
Miller, W. H. (1971, November 18). The Denver Water Department (Genesis: From privately-owned firms to municipally-owned utility)[Internal Water Department document]. Denver, CO: Denver Water Department.
24.
Milward, H. B. (1996). Introduction to Symposium on the Hollow State: Capacity, Control, and Performance in Interorganizational Settings. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 193-195.
25.
Mitchell, J. (1990). The policy activities of public authorities. Policy Studies Journal, 18(4), 928-942.
26.
Mitchell, J. (Ed.). (1992). Public authorities and public policy: The business of government. New York: Praeger.
27.
Moe, R. C. , & Stanton, T. H. (1989). Government-sponsored enterprises as federal instrumentalities: Reconciling private management with public accountability. Public Administration Review, 49(July/August), 321-329.
28.
Morgan, D. R. , & England, R. E. (1988). The two faces of privatization. Public Administration Review, 48(November/December), 979-987.
29.
Morris, J. C. (1999). Defining privatization: A response to Dominey. Public Works Management & Policy, 4(2), 152-154.
30.
Musolf, L. D. , & Seidman, H. (1980). The blurred boundaries of public administration. Public Administration Review, 40(March/April), 124-130.
31.
Price, B. E. (2002). Economics, ideology, politics, and profits: What drives prison privatization?Ph.D. dissertation, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.
32.
Rehfuss, J. A. (1989). Contracting out in government: A guide to working with outside contractors to supply public services. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
34.
Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
35.
Sclar, E. (2000). You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.
Seidman, H. (1989). Viewpoints—Government sponsored enterprises. Public Budgeting and Finance, 9(3), 76-93.
37.
Seppala, O. T. , Hukka, J., & Katko, T. S. (2001). Water and sewage services: Privatization for profit or improvement of service and performance. Public Works Management & Policy, 6(1), 42-58.
38.
Stanton, T. H. , & Moe, R. C. (2002). Government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance(pp. 80-116). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
39.
Tierney, J. T. (1984). Government corporations and managing the public’s business. Political Science Quarterly, 99(1), 73-92.
40.
Walsh, A. H. (1978). The public’s business: The politics and practices of government corporations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Williams, D. W. (2000). Reinventing the proverbs of government. Public Administration Review, 60(November/December), 522-534.
