Incineration has too often been perceived as a potential disposal panacea rather than one of several disposal options that meet varying criteria. Rather than trying to explain its advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis other methods, we should first attempt to determine under what circumstances incineration best serves what disposal needs. The historical trend lines from 1885—when incinerators first appeared—to the present suggest that, in practice, incineration has been most notably a niche technology. To measure its success or failure in terms of aggregate numbers in the total pool of disposal options is to insufficiently understand its function over time, as part of a more complex system of solid waste disposal affected by several variables, including economic, environmental, and regulatory externalities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Public Works Association. (1941). Refuse collection practice. Chicago: Author.
2.
BerenyiE. B.GouldR. N. (1993). Municipal waste combustion in 1993. Waste Age, 24, 51–56.
3.
BowermanF. R.LudwigH. F. (1952). What cities use incinerators—and why?American City, 67, 100–101.
4.
CharlesM. A. (1993). New trends in waste-to-energy. Waste Age, 24, 59–62.
5.
CohnM. M. (1942). Highlights of incinerator construction—1941. Sewage Works Engineering, 13, 87–88.
6.
CrohurstH. R. (1920). Municipal wastes: Their character, collection, disposal. Public Health Bulletin, 107, 48–49.
7.
DenisonR. A.RustonJ. (1990). Recycling and incineration: Evaluating the choices. Washington, DC: Island Press.
FlemingR. R. (1966). Solid-waste disposal; Part II—Incineration and composting. American City, 81, 94–96.
10.
Garbage collection and disposal. (1924). City Manager Magazine, 12–13.
11.
GodfreyK. A.Jr. (1985). Municipal refuse: Is burning best?Civil Engineering, 55, 53–56.
12.
GottliebR. (1993). Forcing the spring: The transformation of the American environmental movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13.
GreenbergM. R.BottgeM.CarvanaJ.HorowitzD.KrugmanB.MasucciN.MilewskiA.NebenzahlL.O'NeillT.SkypeckJ.ValenteN. (1976). Solid waste planning in metropolitan regions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research.
14.
Hard road ahead for city incinerators. (1973). In MillerS. S. (Ed.), Solid wastes—II (pp. 110–114). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
15.
HaysS. P. (1987). Beauty, health and permanence: Environmental politics in the United Slates, 1955–1985. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HeringR.GreeleyS. A. (1921). Collection and disposal of municipal refuse. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
HerseyH. S. (1938a). Incinerators for garbage and refuse disposal—Part I. American City, 53, 61–69.
18.
HerseyH. S. (1938b). Incinerators for garbage and refuse disposal—Part II. American City, 53, 85–89.
19.
HershkowitzA. (1987). Burning trash: How it could work. Technology Review, 90, 27–34.
20.
HolbrookG. C. (1936). The modem refuse incinerator—A sanitary municipal utility. American City, 51, 59–61.
21.
The incinerator—”A machine of beauty.” (1954). American City69, 85.
22.
Incinerator-residue study under way. (1965). American City80, 20.
23.
Institute for Local Self-Reliance. (1986). An environmental review of incineration technologies. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
MalloyM. G.McAdamsC. L. (1994). The U.S. and international municipal waste combustion industry. Waste Age, 25, 89–98.
25.
MarshallC. E. (1929). Incinerator knocks out garbage dump in Long Island town. American City, 40, 129–130.
26.
MaxsonT. E. (1945). New incinerator solves a wartime problem. American City, 60, 81–82.
27.
McAdamsC. L.AquinoJ. T. (1994). Impact on solid waste industry uncertain. Waste Age, 25, 103–106.
28.
McCarthyJ. E. (1986). Incinerating trash: A hot issue, getting hotter. CRS Review, 7, 18–21.
29.
MelosiM. V. (1988). Technology diffusion and refuse disposal: The case of the British destructor. In TarrJ. A.DupuyG. (Eds.), Technology and the rise of the networked city in Europe and America (pp. 207–226). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
MelosiM. V. (1993). Down in the dumps: Is there a garbage crisis in America?Journal of Policy History, 5, 100–127.
31.
MelosiM. V. (1994). Historic development of sanitary landfills and Subtitle D. Energy Laboratory Newsletter, 31, 20–24.
32.
MelosiM. V. (1995). Equity, eco-racism and environmental history. Environmental History Review, 19, 1–16.
33.
Moving to garbage power. (1978, January 9). Time, 46.
34.
Municipal waste combustion around the world. (1995). Waste Age26, 44–45.
35.
National census of refuse incinerator construction—1940. (1941). Sewage Works Engineering12, 88–91.
36.
National Municipal League. (1924). Municipal Index, 1924. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
NealH. A.SchubelJ. R. (1987). Solid waste management and the environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Greenwood.
38.
Public still wants no incinerator as a next door neighbor. (1937). Municipal Sanitation8, 383.
RogusC. A. (1959). Refuse incineration—Trends and developments. American City, 74, 94–98.
41.
Sanitary landfill or incineration? (1951). American City66, 98–99.
42.
SeldmanN. (1989). Mass bum is dying. Environment, 31, 42–44.
43.
SeldmanN.HulsJ. (1981). Beyond the throwaway ethic. Environment, 23, 25–36.
44.
SkinnerJ. H. (1993, December). The consequences of new environmental requirements: Solid waste management as a case study. Paper presented at Centre Jacques Cartier, Lyon, France.
45.
StephensonJ. W. (1964). Planning for incineration. Civil Engineering, 34, 38–41.
46.
StilsonA. E. (1938). Incinerators for garbage and refuse disposal. American City, 53, 109–117.
47.
TaylorH. W. (1935a). Incineration of municipal refuse: Part 1—Municipal wastes. Municipal Sanitation, 6, 141–142.
48.
TaylorH. W. (1935b). Incineration of municipal refuse: Part 4. Municipal Sanitation, 6, 239–241.
49.
TaylorH. W. (1935c). Incineration of municipal refuse: Part 6—Past and present. Municipal Sanitation, 6, 299–300.
50.
TillmanD.RossiA. J.VickK. M. (1989). Incineration of municipal and hazardous solid wastes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1989). Facing Americas trash: What next for municipal solid waste?. Washington, DC: Author.
52.
Van TasselA. J. (Ed.). (1973). Our environment: The outlook for 1980. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
53.
WatsonG. L. (1934). What constitutes a low bid on an incinerator?American City, 49, 66–67.
54.
WipflerM. W. (1930). Modem incineration solves another garbage problem. American City, 42, 101–105.
