Vietnam’s rapid infrastructure development is often hindered by site-clearance bottlenecks, delaying project progress and reducing efficiency. This study aims to identify, prioritize, and examine the interrelationships among site-clearance delay factors in public-infrastructure projects. Using a mixed-methods approach, including literature review, interviews, and a survey with principal component analysis, the results highlight key impediments: limited expertise and staff capacity, weak incentive policies for resettlement, project-scale changes, and difficulties with land records. Finance-related issues, such as inflated compensation and delayed payments, are mid-level challenges, while terrain, ancestral graves, and high resettlement costs are less critical but still impactful. Seven latent dimensions were revealed, spanning technical inefficiencies, regulatory complexities, socio-economic challenges, and financial limitations. This diagnostic framework provides policymakers and project owners with clear priorities to reduce site-clearance delays, offering strategic insights for infrastructure management in Vietnam and other developing-country contexts.
AhmadH. S.AyoushM. D.Al-AlwanM. S. (2020). Causes of delay to public infrastructure projects according to engineers representing different contract parties. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(1), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-03-2019-0026
2.
AndersonJ.JaffeeS. M.PhamH. T. M.SoucatA. L.NguyenD. H.TranH. T. L. (2012). Revising the land law to enable sustainable development in Vietnam: Summary of priority policy recommendations drawn from World Bank studies. The World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/997881468328571984.
3.
AssafS. A.Al-HejjiS. (2006). Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.010
4.
BabatundeS. O.AdeniyiO.AwodeleO. A. (2017). Investigation into the causes of delay in land acquisition for PPP projects in developing countries. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 15(4), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2016-0029
5.
BagendaB.NdevuZ. (2024). Principal risks associated with public-private partnership projects in Uganda. Public Works Management & Policy, 29(2), 183–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X231167326
6.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
DoloiH.SawhneyA.IyerK.RentalaS. (2012). Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.004
9.
DuongM. T.SamsuraD. a. A.Van Der KrabbenE. (2023). Socio-economic and environmental impacts of land acquisition for tourism development in Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2283923. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2283923
10.
DuongM. T.SamsuraD. a. A.Van Der KrabbenE. (2025). Land increment value distribution through land development strategies for tourism in Vietnam. Journal of Property Research, 42(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2024.2444889
11.
DurdyevS.HosseiniM. R. (2020). Causes of delays on construction projects: A comprehensive list. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0178
12.
EwusieI.TannorO.AhiaduA. A.NtimO. K. (2024). Exploring the psychological and emotional burden of compulsory acquisition: A case study of new Akrade-Mpakadan, Ghana. Property Management, 42(5), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-10-2023-0105
13.
FangX.CaoC.ChenZ.ChenW.NiL.JiZ.GanJ. (2020). Using mixed methods to design service quality evaluation indicator system of railway container multimodal transport. Science progress, 103(1), 0036850419890491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419890491
Hong PhamL.HadikusumoH. (2014). Schedule delays in engineering, procurement, and construction petrochemical projects in Vietnam: A qualitative research study. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 8(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2013-0009
18.
HotellingH. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(6), 417–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325
19.
HuynhN. M.Tuan LeA.Le-HoaiL.NguyenH. T. (2025). Factors causing cost overruns in public hospital construction in developing countries: A case from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 24(3), 1716–1730. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2357196
20.
HuynhT. T.-M.DangC. N.Le-HoaiL.PhamA.-D.NguyenT. D. (2020). Proposing a strategy map for coastal urban project success using the balanced scorecard method. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), 2993–3030. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2018-0527
21.
KhanhH. D. (2024). Assessment of key risks affecting investment capital performance in Vietnam’s BOT-tolled highway projects. Public Works Management & Policy, 30(4), 1087724X251356466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X251356466
22.
KhanhH. D. (2025a). Investigating the Causal Factors Contributing to Slow Site Clearance and Their Effects on Road Construction Costs and Timelines. Public Works Management & Policy, 30(4), 1087724X251341920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X251341920
23.
KhanhH. D. (2025b). Stakeholder perspectives on site clearance delays in Vietnam’s ODA-Funded infrastructure projects for salinity intrusion mitigation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2025-0831
24.
KhanhH. D.Van TiepN. (2025). Site clearance bottlenecks in Vietnam’s ODA-Funded infrastructure projects: An FSE-Based decision-making model. Expert Systems with Applications, 303, 130675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130675
25.
KimH. J.YeunE. J. (2023). Development and validation of the cancer fatigue scale: A methodological study. Sage Open, 13(1), 21582440231163784. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231163784
26.
KumarM.KumariS. (2025). Causes of delays in road construction projects: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 30(2), 256–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-01-2023-0004
27.
LeD.-A.DangC. N.Le-HoaiL.HoangV. Q. (2024). Influences of critical success factors on nonprofit outcomes of ODA education construction projects: A case of Vietnam. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(5), 1423–1446. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-11-2023-0476
28.
LeeK.-T.ParkS.-J.KimJ.-H. (2023). Comparative analysis of managers’ perception in overseas construction project risks and cost overrun in actual cases: A perspective of the Republic of Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(4), 2291–2308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2116940
29.
Le-HoaiL.LeeY. D.LeeJ. Y. (2008). Delay and cost overruns in Vietnam large construction projects: A comparison with other selected countries. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(6), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-0367-7
LiuY.WangX.ZhangJ.GuoS. (2025). How risk factors lead to the early termination of public–private partnership projects in China: A multi-case study based on social network analysis and interpretive-structure modeling. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(2), 824–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2022-0876
32.
LongN. D.OgunlanaS.QuangT.LamK. C. (2004). Large construction projects in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.03.004
33.
MahmudA. T.AhmedS. I. N.OlanipekunA.AhaB.AkohS. R. (2025). Qualitative system dynamics approach to modelling cost escalation determinants in Nigerian public sector projects. Journal of Facilities Management, 24(1), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-07-2024-0085
34.
MaqboolR.SridharH. (2024). Governing public–private partnerships of sustainable construction projects in an opportunistic setting. Project Management Journal, 55(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231214227
35.
MarzoukM. M.El-RasasT. I. (2014). Analyzing delay causes in Egyptian construction projects. Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.11.005
36.
MolinariL.HaezendonckE.Van RompayK.MabillardV.DoomsM. (2025). Persisting cost overruns in public infrastructure projects: Lessons from the Belgian case. Public Works Management & Policy, 30(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X251356466
37.
MotteeL. K.ArtsJ.VanclayF.HowittR.MillerF. (2020). Limitations of technical approaches to transport planning practice in two cases: Social issues as a critical component of urban projects. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1696980
38.
NajafiM.NouriH.AminiA. M. (2024), “Comparative analysis of the effects of managerial and performance dimensions of rural producers’ Cooperatives in Iran”, SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241304428. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241304428
39.
NguyenM. V.HaK. D.PhanC. T. (2024a). What makes the reconstruction of old residential buildings complex? A study in Vietnamese urban areas. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(10), 7086–7110. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2024-0300
40.
NguyenT.ChilesheN.HoD. T.NguyenV. T.TranQ. P. (2024b). Significant risks that trigger cost overruns and delays in urban rail projects: A typical case study of Vietnam. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 14(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2023-0027
41.
NguyenT. P.ChilesheN. (2015). Revisiting the construction project failure factors in Vietnam. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2013-0042
42.
OdehA. M.BattainehH. T. (2002). Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00037-5
43.
OgunlanaS. O.PromkuntongK.JearkjirmV. (1996). Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: Comparing Thailand with other economies. International Journal of Project Management, 14(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00052-6
44.
OgunsanyaO. A.AigbavboaC. O.ThwalaD. W.EdwardsD. J. (2022). Barriers to sustainable procurement in the Nigerian construction industry: An exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1658697
45.
SambasivanM.SoonY. W. (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.007
46.
ShahsavandP.MarefatA.ParchamijalalM. (2018). Causes of delays in construction industry and comparative delay analysis techniques with SCL protocol. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(4), 497–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2016-0220
47.
ShameemS.RajeswariM. (2025). An empirical study of infrastructure and economic development in the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Millennial Asia, 16(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231166107
VanclayF. (2017). Project-induced displacement and resettlement: From impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development?Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1278671
WibowoA.AlfenH. W. (2015). Predicting the probability of default for municipal water utilities in Indonesia. Public Works Management & Policy, 20(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X14558269
54.
WuniI. Y.ShenG. Q.Osei-KyeiR.Agyeman-YeboahS. (2022). Modelling the critical risk factors for modular integrated construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(11), 2013–2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1763049
55.
ZulmasyhurZ. (2024). The public services transformation in Enhancing communities welfare in Bandung City. Public Works Management & Policy, 31(1), 1087724X251329076. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X251329076
