As states and regions continue to face challenges related to watershed conservation, watershed stakeholders have become more dependent on collaborative partnerships to solve complex water conservation and environmental problems. These collaborative partnerships often include programs of payments for water-based ecosystem services (PWES). PWES’s are arrangements funded by government or private parties where benefits are offered to ecosystem services providers in exchange for their work on protecting the watershed environment. This paper explores collaborative partnerships of PWES’s in the United States with an emphasis on determining the types of governance structures used by the collaboratives. The study finds that PWES’s primarily engage in interagency and cross-sector governance practices, and less so with grassroots governance practices. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of collaborative partnerships of these programs through the lens of governance structure will enhance local and regional organizations’ abilities to provide the best approach for addressing a particular watershed goal.
ArvidssonR. (2019). On the use of ordinal scoring scales in social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(3), 604–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1557-2
2.
BennettG.CarrollN. (2014). Gaining depth: State of watershed investment 2014. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace.
3.
BennettG.RuefF. (2016). Alliances for green infrastructure: State of watershed investment 2016. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace.
4.
BrouwerR. O. Y.TesfayeA.PauwP. (2011). Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environmental Conservation, 38(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892911000543
5.
BullockR.ZurbaM.ReedM. G.McCarthyD. (2023). Strategic options for more effective indigenous participation in collaborative environmental governance. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 43(4), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x20920913
6.
CairnsM.CoxC. E.ZambranaJ.FlotemerschJ.LanA.PhillipsA.KozhuharovaG.QirjoM.Szigeti BonifertM.KadeliL. (2017). Building multi-country collaboration on watershed management: Lessons on linking environment and public health from the Western Balkans. Reviews on Environmental Health, 32(1-2), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0053
7.
Center for Watershed Protection. (1998). Rapid watershed planning handbook: A comprehensive guide for managing urbanizing watersheds.
8.
CisnerosP. (2019). What makes collaborative water governance partnerships resilient to policy change? A comparative study of two cases in Ecuador. Ecology and Society, 24(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-10667-240129
9.
DadaM. A.MajemiteM. T.ObaigbenaA.DaraojimbaO. H.OlihaJ. S.NwokediegwuZ. Q. S. (2024). Review of smart water management: IoT and AI in water and wastewater treatment. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0171
10.
DanielsA. E.BagstadK.EspositoV.MoulaertA.RodriguezC. M. (2010). Understanding the impacts of costa Rica's PES: Are we asking the right questions?Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2116–2126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.011
11.
Diaz-KopeL.Miller-StevensK. (2015). Rethinking a typology of watershed partnerships: A governance perspective. Public Works Management & Policy, 20(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x14524733
12.
Diaz-KopeL.Miller-StevensK.MorrisJ. C. (2015). Collaboration processes and institutional structure: Reexamining the black box. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949755
13.
DinarA. (2024). Challenges to water resource management: The role of economic and modeling approaches. Water, 16(4), Article 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040610
14.
EiswerthM. E.van KootenG. C. (2019). Maximizing returns from payments for water‐based ecosystem services: Incorporating externality effects of land management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 55(5), 1335–1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12788
15.
FengC.YangL.LuoM.LiuQ. (2023). A framework of payments for water-related ecosystem services (PWES) based on green water management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425(2023), Article 138930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138930
16.
FengD.WuW.LiangL.LiL.ZhaoG. (2018). Payments for watershed ecosystem services: Mechanism, progress, and challenges. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 4(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1434318
17.
FiczkowskiN.KrantzbergG. (2024). Enhanging climate resiliency through improving ecosystem services in shoreline municipalities – Lessons from Canada. Coastal Management, 52(6), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2024.2422675
18.
FlotemerschJ.LeibowitzS. G.HillR. A.StoddardL.ThomsM. C.TharmeR. E. (2015). A watershed integrity definition and assessment approach to support strategic management of watersheds. River Research and Applications, 32(7), 1654–1671. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2978
GalvezV.RojasR. (2019). Collaboration and integrated water resources management: A literature review. World Water Policy, 5(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.12013
21.
GellmanM. (2021). Collaborative methodology with Indigenous communities: A framework for addressing power inequalities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(3), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096521000299
22.
GerlakA. K.ElderA.ThomureT.ShipekC.Zuniga-TernanA.Pavao-ZuckermanM.GuptaN.MatslerM.BergenL.HenryA. D.YangB.Murrieta-SaldivarJ.MeixnerT. (2021). Green infrastructure: Lessons in governance and collaboration from Tucson. Environment, 63(3), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2021.1898894
23.
ImperialM. T. (2023). Life cycle dynamics and developmental processes in collaborative partnerships: Examples from four watersheds in the U.S. Environmental Management, 71(3), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01699-4
24.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
25.
KenneyD.McAllisterS.CaileW.PeckhamJ. (2000). The new watershed source book. Natural Resources Law Center.
26.
KolinjivadiV.AdamowskiJ.KosoyN. (2014). Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach. Ecosystem Services, 10, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.008
LarsonA. M.BarlettiJ. P. S.VigilN. H. (2022). A place at the table is not enough: Accountability for Indigenous Peoples and local communities in multi-stakeholder platforms. World Development, 155, Article 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105907
30.
LarssonJ. (2025). Improving the performance of multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development in coastal areas: Sweden (Hanö Bay) as a case study. World Maritime University Dissertations.
31.
LinH. (2012). The global science of integrated water governance. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, B 1(10B), 1167–1174.
32.
LinH.ThorntonJ. A.SlawskiT. M. (2013). Participatory and evolutionary integrated lake basin management. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management, 18(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/lre.12015
LubellM.SchneiderM.ScholzJ.MeteM. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088419
35.
Martin-OrtegaJ.OjeaE.RouxC. (2013). Payments for water ecosystem services in Latin America: A literature review and conceptual model. Ecosystem Services, 6, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.008
36.
McIlwainL.BairdJ.BaldwinC.PickeringG.ManathungaC.SmithT. (2024). Understanding the complex power dynamics that shape collaboration and social learning in multi-stakeholder water governance. Ecology and Society, 29(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-15109-290331
37.
McNamaraM. W.MorrisJ. C. (2020). Multiorganizational arrangements for watershed protection: Working better together. Routledge.
38.
MedemaW.McIntoshB. S.JeffreyP. J. (2008). From premise to practice: A critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecology and Society, 13(2), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02611-130229
39.
Miralles-WilhelmF.MatthewsJ. H.KarresN.AbellR.DaltonJ.KangS.-T.LiuJ.MaendlyR.MatthewsN.McDonaldR.Muñoz-CastilloR.Ochoa-TocachiB. F.PradhanN.RodriguezD.VigerstølK.van WesenbeeckB. (2023). Emerging themes and future directions in watershed resilience research. Water Security, 18, Article 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100132
40.
MooreE.KoontzT. (2003). A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources, 16(5), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309182
41.
MorrisJ. C.GibsonW. A.LeavittW. M.JonesS. C. (2013). The case for grassroots collaboration: Social capital and ecosystem restoration at the local level. Lexington Press.
42.
National Research Council. (2002). Privatization of water services in the United States: An assessment of issues and experience. The National Academies Press. https://www.nationalacademies.org/publications/10135
43.
SabatierP.WeibleC.FickerJ. (2005). Eras of water management in the United States: Implication for collaborative watershed approaches. In SabatierP.FochtW.LubellM.TrachtenbergZ.VedlitzA.MatlockM. (Eds.), Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management (pp. 23–51). The MIT Press.
44.
SquiresE.MarkeyS.GibsonR. (2022). Place-based environmental philanthropy: The role of community-based organizations in the Skeena watershed. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 13(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser585
45.
SullivanA.WhiteD. D.HanemannM. (2019). Designing collaborative governance: Insights from the drought contingency planning process for the lower colorado river basin. Environmental Science & Policy, 91, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.011
Water Action Hub. (2025). Connect to water stewardship practices & opportunities around the world. wateractionhub.org.
50.
WhiteD. D.LawlessK. L.VivoniE. R.MascaroG.PahleR.KumarI.ColiP.CastilloR. M.MoredaF.AsforaM. (2018). Co-producing interdisciplinary knowledge and action for sustainable water governance: Lessons from the development of a water resources decision support system in Pernambuco, Brazil. Global Challenges, 3(4), Article 1800012. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800012
51.
WinelandS. M.BaşağaoğluH.FlemingJ.FriedmanJ.Garza‐DiazL.KelloggW.KochJ.LaneB. A.MirchiA.NavaL. F.NeesonT. M.Ortiz‐PartidaJ. P.PaladinoS.PlassinS.Gomez‐QuirogaG.Saiz‐RodriguezR.Sandoval‐SolisS.WagnerK.WeberN.WootenA. M. (2021). The environmental flows implementation challenge: Insights and recommendations across water‐limited systems. WIREs Water, 9(1), Article e1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1565
52.
WunderS. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts (42, pp. 1–32). Bogor, Indonesia: Cifor.
53.
WunderS. (2011). Payments for environmental services: Institutional preconditions in developing countries. In Presentation to the international conference on payments for ecosystem services, Berlin, 10/11 November 2011. https://pes-conference.civiland-zalf.org/
54.
WunderS.EngelS.PagiolaS. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
55.
YanL.XuJ.QuinF.WangJ. (2018). Payments for watershed services and practices in China: Achievements and challenges. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0981-3
56.
YildirimerS.DemirciU. (2017). Applicability of payments for ecosystem service mechanism in water resource protection in Turkey. International Journal of Ecosystems & Ecology Services, 7(3), 251–262.
57.
ZhangX.González RivasM.GrantM.WarnerM. E. (2022). Water pricing and affordability in the US: Public vs. private ownership. Water Policy, 24(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2022.283
