Equity concerns regarding local revenue sources are increasingly important in the United States, as local sales taxes for transportation increase amid perceived federal funding shortfalls. This study examines shifts in the federal role and local funding sources for public transit projects supported by the New Starts program. The analysis finds that total federal New Starts spending grew over this period, but was distributed across more costly projects, with a resulting decrease in the average federal share per project. As expected, there was increased sales tax use at the local level. The increase in local spending on transit should be met with concern. Prior research has established that sales taxes fail along both the beneficiary to pay and ability to pay equity principles. Thus, the recent massive commitment to expanding public transit infrastructure relies on concerning funding mechanisms and may also fail to prioritize the needs of those with limited accessibility.
AlbrechtM.BrownA.LedermanJ.TaylorB. D.WachsM. (2017). The equity challenges and outcomes of California county transportation sales taxes. Berkeley: University of California Center on Economic Competitiveness.
2.
American Public Transportation Association. (2015). APTA primer on transit funding: The moving ahead for progress in the 21st century act and other related laws, FY 2013 through FY 2015 (Reprinted ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Public Transportation Association. (n.d.). FAST Act: A guide to public transportation and rail-related provisions. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
BrownJ. (2013). The modern streetcar in the U.S.: An examination of its ridership, performance, and function as a public transportation mode. Journal of Public Transportation, 16(4), 43-61. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol16/iss4/3/
6.
Cambridge Systematic Inc., KFH Group Inc., McCollum Management Consulting Inc. (2009). Local and regional funding mechanism for public transportation (Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 129). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Federal Transit Administration. (2008, November1). Capital investment program guidance and application instructions (Advisory Circular FTA C 9300.1B). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
GoldmanT.WachsM. (2003). A quiet revolution in transportation finance: The rise of local option transportation taxes. Transportation Quarterly, 57(1), 19-32.
11.
GrengsJ. (2002). Community-based planning as a source of political change: The transit equity movement of Los Angeles’ Bus Riders Union. The Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 165-178.
12.
HananelR.BerechmanJ. (2016). Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. Transport Policy, 49, 78-85.
13.
HessD. B.LombardiP. A. (2005). Governmental subsidies for public transit: History, current issues, and recent evidence. Public Works Management & Policy, 10, 138-156.
KingD. A.FischerL. A. (2016). Streetcar projects as spatial planning: A shift in transport planning in the United States. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 383-390. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.005
16.
LitmanT. (2014). Evaluating public transportation local funding options. Journal of Public Transportation, 17(1), 43-74.
17.
MartensK. (2017). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
MathurS. (2014). Innovation in public transport finance: Property value capture. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
MathurS. (2015). Funding public transportation through special assessment districts: Addressing the equity concerns. Public Works Management & Policy, 20, 127-145.
20.
Nahmias-BiranB.MartenK.ShiftanY. (2017). Integrating equity in transportation project assessment: A philosophical exploration and its practical implications. Transport Reviews, 37, 192-210.
PereiraR. H. M.SchwanenT.BanisterD. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37, 170-191.
23.
Public transportation capital investment grant (New Starts) program: background and issues for Congress. (2016). (CRS Report No. R44534). Retrieved from Congressional Research Service website https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44534.html
24.
RosenbloomS. (2010). Alternative transportation financing strategies: Special equity implications for older and retired people. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2163, 15-23. doi:10.3141/2163-02
25.
SchweitzerL.TaylorB. D. (2008). Just pricing: The distributional effects of congestion pricing and sales taxes. Transportation, 35, 797-812.
26.
TaylorB. D.MorrisE. A. (2015). Public transportation objectives and rider demographics: Are transit’s priorities poor public policy?Transportation, 42, 347-367.
27.
TaylorB. D.Tassiello NortonA. (2009). Paying for transportation: What’s a fair price?Journal of Planning Literature, 24, 22-36.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Public transit: Funding for New Starts and Small Starts projects, October 2004 through June 2012 (GAO-13-40). Washington, DC: Author.
30.
ZhaoZ. J.LarsonK. (2011). Special assessments as a value capture strategy for public transit finance. Public Works Management & Policy, 16, 320-340.
