Intercity passenger rail services must be designed in a way that users will be willing and able to ride. This study examines potential users’ current travel behaviors and willingness to ride a proposed passenger rail between New Orleans and Baton Rouge in Louisiana, US. By analyzing a user preference survey with discrete choice experiment (DCE), the results show a strong support of the proposed rail service, but distinct deficiencies in the current multimodal transportation environment connecting to and from proposed stations. In addition, previous analyses include potentially faulty assumptions about trip purposes, which have critical implications for service design. The findings of this study reflect the priorities of likely rail passengers and advance efforts to plan for successful passenger rail service operation in Southeast Louisiana. The potential user-based and data-driven approach of this case study can also be used for planning other passenger rail services in the US.
AmdalJ. R. (2011). Rails to recovery: The role of passenger rail transportation in post-katrina new Orleans and Louisiana. UNOTI Publications. Retrieved fromhttps://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs/6
2.
AstonL.CurrieG.DelboscA.KamruzzamanM.TellerD. (2020). Exploring built environment impacts on transit use – an updated meta-analysis. Transport Reviews, 41(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1806941
ChenZ. (2010). Who rides the high speed rail in the United States: The Acela express case study. ASME/IEEE joint rail conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2010-36236
CummingsC.MahmassaniH. (2022). Does intercity rail station placement matter? Expansion of the node-place model to identify station location impacts on Amtrak ridership. Journal of Transport Geography, 99(2022), 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103278.
EwingR.CerveroR. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
FlyvbjergB. (2007). Cost overruns and demand shortfalls in urban rail and other infrastructure. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060701207938
12.
GoldmanB. (2022). Intercity passenger rail: Federal policy and programs (p. R47260). Congressional Research Service.
JamesW.JiaC.KediaS. (2012). Uneven magnitude of disparities in cancer risks from air toxics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(12), 4365–4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9124365
16.
KamgaC.YaziciM. A. (2014). Achieving environmental sustainability beyond technological improvements: Potential role of high-speed rail in the United States of America. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31(2014), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.06.011.
LitmanT. (2020). Evaluating public transit benefits and costs: Best practices guidebook. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Retrieved October 20, 2020, fromhttps://www.vtpi.org/tranben.pdf
19.
Losada-RojasL. L.GkartzonikasC.GkritzaK.PyrialakouV. D. (2017). Evaluating opportunities to enhance Hoosier State Train ridership through a survey of riders’ opinions and an assessment of access to the line. Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316574
20.
MuellerJ. D.Hunter-ZaworskiK. (2014). Bicycle network connectivity for passenger rail stations. Transportation research record, 2448(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2448-03
21.
National Research Council (US) (2007). Metropolitan travel forecasting: Current Practice and future direction--special report 288. Transportation Research Board. Retrieved October 20, 2020, fromhttp://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr288.pdf
22.
ParkK.FarbA.ChenS. (2021). First-/last-mile experience matters: The influence of the built environment on satisfaction and loyalty among public transit riders. Transport policy, 112(2021), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.003.
23.
ParkK.SabouriS.LyonsT.TianG.EwingR. (2020). Intrazonal or interzonal? Improving intrazonal travel forecast in a four-step travel demand model. Transportation, 47(5), 2087–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10002-0
24.
PyrialakouV. D.GkritzaK. (2016). Exploring the opinions of passenger rail riders: Evidence from the hoosier state train. ASME/IEEE joint rail conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2016-5778
25.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
26.
SabouriS.TianG.EwingR.ParkK.GreeneW. (2021). The built environment and vehicle ownership modeling: Evidence from 32 diverse regions in the US. Journal of transport geography, 93(2021), 103073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103073.
SperryB. R.CollinsT. (2018). Improving intercity passenger rail planning using evidence from passenger survey data. Transportation Research Record, 2672(10). https://doi.org/10.1177/036119811879349
30.
SperryB. R.LarsonS.LeucingerD.JanowiakS.MorganC. A. (2012). Intercity passenger rail access to airports: Case study in milwaukee, Wisconsin. Transportation Research Record, 2300(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/2300-03
31.
TianG.EwingR.GreeneW. (2015). Desire for smart growth: A survey of residential preferences in the salt lake region of Utah. Housing Policy Debate, 25(3), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.971333
32.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). 2020: Decennial census redistricting data (PL 94-171). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved fromhttps://data.census.gov/
33.
WeberS. (2021). A step-by-step procedure to implement discrete choice experiments in Qualtrics. Social Science Computer Review, 39(5), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319885317
