Electric rates in Plattsburgh, New York are among the least expensive in the United States. Plattsburgh’s rates are set by a preference power program that was enacted in 1957 to promote rural economic development. A survey distributed to customers of Plattsburgh’s municipally-owned electric utility inquired about familiarity with local electric rates and energy systems, conservation behaviors, and attitudes towards policy interventions intended to encourage conservation. Results indicate that energy consumers in Plattsburgh hold a moderate degree of familiarity with the community’s energy system and implement strong conservation actions. Support for policy interventions are mixed. Survey results reveal income inequality, as differences in conservation attitudes and behaviors are apparent among respondents that report varying degrees of financial vulnerability. Today, Plattsburgh is in need of a resilient energy system, yet inexpensive rates discourage investment in infrastructure. This research reveals the complex social, economic and policy forces interacting to determine Plattsburgh’s energy future.
AdesanyaA. A. (2021). Can Michigan’s upper Peninsula achieve justice in transitioning to 100% renewable energy: Survey of public perceptions in sociotechnical change. Sustainability, 13(1), Article 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010431
2.
AndersonD.MoggridgeH.WarrenP.ShucksmithJ. (2015). The impacts of run-of-river hydropower on the physical and ecological conditions of rivers. Water and Environment Journal, 29(2), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12101
3.
BhattacharyaJ.DeLeireT.HaiderS.CurrieJ. (2002). Heat or eat? Cold weather shocks and nutrition in poor American families. National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
BlaschJ.BoogenN.DaminatoC.FilippiniM. (2018). Empower the consumer! Energy-related financial literacy and its socioeconomic determinants. CER-ETH economics working Paper series. Center for Economic Research at ETH Zurich.
5.
BrounenD.KokN.QuigleyJ. M. (2013). Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households. Energy Economics, 38, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008
6.
BrownS.TaylorK.WheatleyP. S. (2005). Debt and distress: Evaluating the psychological cost of credit. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(5), 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.01.002
7.
City of Plattsburgh Final Report. (2016). NY prize task 5 milestone deliverable. Willdan Energy Solutions and City of Plattsburgh.
8.
CookJ. T.FrankD. A.CuttsD. B.Rose-JacobsR.BlackM. M.ChiltonM.deCubaS. E.AppuglieseD.ColemanS.HeerenT.BerkowitzC. (2008). A brief indicator of household energy security: Associations with food security, child health, & child development in US infants and toddlers. Pediatrics, 122(4), 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0286
DeWatersJ. E.PowersS. E. (2011). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York state (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect and behavior. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049
11.
DeWatersJ. E.PowersS. E.GrahamC. (2007). Developing and energy literacy scale. In 114th Annual ASEE Conference Exop. Conference Proceedings. Lockheed Martin: IBM; DuPon.
12.
DiekmannA.PreisendorferP. (2003). Green and Greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463103154002
GervichC.PittD. (2014). The sustainability of preference power allocations: An exploration of the Niagara Preference Power Program through the lens of the three’s. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0172-1
21.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Polity Press.
22.
GreenM. (2007). Voices of people experiencing poverty in scotland. Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the Poverty Alliance.
HernandezD.AratainY.YangJ. (2014). Energy insecurity among families with children. National Center for Children in poverty. Mailman school of public health. Columbia University.
26.
HernandezD.PhillipsD.SiegelE. L. (2016). Exploring the housing and household energy pathways to stress: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), Article 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090916
27.
HernandezD.SiegelE. (2019). Energy insecurity and its ill health effects; a community perspective on the energy-health nexus in New York city. Energy Research and Social Science, 47, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.011
28.
HirshE. (1983). Cultural literacy. The American Scholar, 52(2), 159–169.
29.
HoffmanA. O. I.McNairS. J. (2019). How does consumers financial vulnerability relate to positive and negative financial outcome? The mediating role of individual psychological characteristics. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(4), 1630–1673.
30.
HomansG. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
31.
HuebnerG. M.CooperJ.JonesK. (2013). Domestic energy consumption—what role do comfort, habit and knowledge about the heating system play?Energy and Buildings, 66, 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.043
32.
JacksonT. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change. A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network.
33.
LeeM. P.SabriM. F. (2017). Review of financial vulnerability studies. Archives of Business Research, 5(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.52.2784
34.
LeightyW.MeierA. (2011). Accelerated electricity conservation in Juneau, Alaska: A study of household activities that reduced demand by 25. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2299–2309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.041
35.
MagadiM.MiddletonS. (2007). Severe child poverty in the U.K. Save the Children.
McEwenB. S. (2000). Allostasis and allostatic load: Implications for neuropsychopharmacology. Neuropsychopharmacology, 22(2), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-133x(99)00129-3
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academic Press.
41.
National Weather Service. (2017). Local climate data and Plots, monthly normals/records. National atmospheric and oceanographic administration. https://www.weather.gov/btv/climate
42.
O’ConnerG. E.NewmeyerC. E.WongN. Y. C.BayukJ. B.CookL. A.KomarovaY.LoiblC.OngL. L.WarmathD. (2019). Conceptualizing the multiple dimensions of consumer financial vulnerability. Journal of Business Research, 100, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.033
43.
ParkerJ. (2000). Structuration. Open University Press.
44.
PowerM. (2008). The burden of FY 2008 residential energy bills on low-income consumers. Economic Opportunity Studies.
RieszJ.GilmoreJ.HindsbergerM. (2013). Chapter 25: Market design for the integration of variable generation. In Evolution of global electricity markets: New Paradigms, new challenges, new approaches. Academic Press.
47.
SeawrightJ. (2016). The case for selecting cases that are deviant or extreme on the independent variable. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124116643556
48.
SutterlinB.BrunnerT. A.SiegristM. (2013). Impact of social value orientation on energy conservation in different behavioral domains. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12128
49.
TreacyW. (2013). Personal communication.
50.
TrottaG.KalmiP.KazukauskasA. (2017). The role of energy literacy as a component of financial literacy: Survey-based evidence from Finland. In 15th IAEE European Conference.
51.
UNESCO. (1977). The tbilisi declaration, intergovernmental conference on environmental education. In HungerfordH.BluhmW. J.VolkT. L.RamseyJ. M. (Eds.), Essential Readings in environmental education. Stipes Publishing, LLC.
van den BroekKarlijnL. (2019). Household energy literacy: A critical review and a conceptual typology. Energy Research and Social Science, 57, Article 101256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101256
WilsonC.DowlatabadiH. (2007). Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 169–203.
59.
ZintlR. (1989). Der Homo oeconomicus: Ausnahmeerscheinung in jeder situation oder jedermann in ausnahmesituationen?Analyse und Kritik, 11(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1989-0103
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
