Water and wastewater infrastructure (W&WI) in the United States is in need of immediate capital investments. Support from the federal government has declined significantly in the past two decades, forcing state and local governments to contribute a larger share. With increased decentralization of infrastructure decision making, public opinion is playing an ever greater role. Questions on capital investment, privatization, and concern for W&WI were part of a national omnibus survey of 1,000 respondents in the United States conducted in 2012. Demographic variables explained a small part of the variation in responses but were inconsistently significant across the issues, except for party affiliation, which was a significant explanatory variable for all the three issues. Stated preferences through public opinion surveys, coupled with revealed preferences, can provide policymakers a broad understanding of public support for various W&WI policy alternatives. An informed electorate and a responsive government can together address complex challenges facing the water and wastewater sector in the country.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2009). Infrastructure fact sheet 2009. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Water Works Association. (2012). Buried no longer: Confronting America’s water infrastructure challenge. Boulder, CO: Author.
3.
AminM. (2003, September/October). North America’s electricity infrastructure. Are we ready for more perfect storms? IEEE Security & Privacy, pp. 19-25.
4.
AndersonR. F. (2006). Major capital investment in water and wastewater infrastructure: City practices and attitudes concerning the state revolving fund loan program. Washington, DC: The U.S. Conference of Mayors, Mayors Water Council.
BeecherJ. A. (2011). Trends in consumer prices (CPI) for utilities through 2011 (IPU Research Note). Lansing: Michigan State University.
8.
BelG.FagedaX.WarnerM. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 553-577.
9.
Black & Veatch. (2012). Strategic directions in the U.S. water utility industry. Overland Park, KS: Author.
10.
Congressional Budget Office. (2010). Public spending on transportation and water infrastructure (Publication No. 4088). Washington, DC: Author.
11.
CopelandC. (2012). Water infrastructure financing: History of EPA appropriations. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service Report, 96-647.
12.
CopelandC.TiemannM. (2010). water infrastructure needs and investment: Review and analysis of key issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service (Report RL31116).
13.
Cornell National Social Survey. (2012). Survey research institute. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
14.
CottaS. A. (2012). Privatization and water service provision in the United States: A recommendation for expanded oversight and the development and adoption of best practices. Water International, 37, 818-830.
15.
CoutardO. (Ed.). (1999). The governance of large technical systems. London, England: Routledge.
16.
CrainW. M.OakleyL. K. (1995). The politics of infrastructure. Journal of Law & Economics, 38, 1-17.
17.
Dublin Principles. (1992, January26-31). The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. International Conference on the Water and the Environment, Dublin, Ireland.
FelbingerC. L. (1992). Public works in the USA: Structure, organization and financing. In HoulihanB. (Ed.), The challenge of public works management: A comparative study of North America, Japan and Europe (pp. 29-64). Brussels, Belgium: International Institute of Administrative Sciences.
GerlakA. K. (2006). Federalism and U.S. water policy: Lessons for the twenty-first century. Publius, 36, 231-257. doi:10.1093/publius/pji032
22.
GilbertP. H.IsenbergJ.BaecherG. B.PapayL. T.SpielvogelL. G.WoodardJ. B.BadolatoE. V. (2003). Infrastructure issues for cities: Countering terrorist threat. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 9, 44-54.
23.
GlennonR. (2005). Water scarcity, marketing, and privatization. Texas Law Review, 83, 1873-1902.
24.
HamiltonD. K. (2000). Organizing government structure and governance functions in metropolitan areas in response to growth and change: A critical overview. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22, 65-84. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00040
25.
Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies. (2011). The Rockefeller Foundation infrastructure survey. Washington, DC: Author.
26.
Howell-MoroneyM. E.HallJ. L. (2011). Waste in the sewer: The collapse of accountability and transparency in public finance in Jefferson County, Alabama. Public Administration Review, 71, 232-242. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02334.x
27.
HuqueA. S.WattonN. (2010). Federalism and implementation of environmental policy: Changing trends in Canada and the United States. Public Organization Review, 10, 71-88. doi:10.1007/s11115-009-0089-4
28.
Initiative & Referendum Institute. (2013). Ballotwatch. Initiative & Referendum Institute at the University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://www.iandrinstitute.org/ballotwatch.htm
29.
ITT Xylem. (2010). The value of water survey. White Plains, NY: Xylem.
30.
JacobyW. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750-767.
31.
Johnson Foundation. (2012). Convening report: Financing sustainable water infrastructure. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation at Wingspread.
KamenicaE. (2008). Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. American Economic Review, 98, 2127-2149. doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.2127
34.
KaufmanS.SnapeK. (1997). Public attitudes toward urban infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 1, 224-244.
35.
KellyJ. M.SwindellD. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610-621.
36.
LeavittW. M.KieferJ. J. (2006). Infrastructure interdependency and the creation of a normal disaster: The case of Hurricane Katrina and the city of New Orleans. Public Works Management & Policy, 10, 306-314.
37.
LeblancW.SnyderJ. M.TripathiM. (2000). Majority-rule bargaining and the under provision of public investment goods. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 21-47.
38.
LesterJ. P. (1986). New federalism and environmental policy. Publius, 16, 149-166.
McFarlaneC.RutherfordJ. (2008). Political infrastructures: Governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 363-374. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00792.x
McKeeS. C.ShawD. R. (2003). Suburban voting in Presidential elections. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33, 125-144.
43.
McManusS. (2004). “Bricks and mortar” politics: How infrastructure decisions defeat incumbents. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24, 96-112. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2004.02401005.x
44.
MeansE. G.OspinaL.PatrickR. (2005). Ten primary trends and their implications for water utilities. Journal of American Water Works Association, 97, 64-77.
45.
MillerK.CostaK.CooperD. (2012). How to upgrade and maintain our nation’s wastewater and drinking water infrastructure. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
ShandlingK. (2012, December). Public or private, the question is: How to pay for it?Water/Waste Processing, pp. 16-19.
53.
SpeirC.StephensonK. (2007). Does sprawl cost us all? Isolating the effects of housing patterns on public water and sewer costs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68, 56-70.
54.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354-369.
55.
TroeskenW.GeddesR. (2003). Municipalizing American Waterworks, 1897-1915. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19, 373-400.
56.
WacquantL. (1995). The ghetto, the State, and the new capitalist economy. In KasinitzP. (Ed.), Metropolis: Center and symbol of our times (pp. 413-449). New York: New York University Press.
57.
WaltersN. (2011). Replacing the nation’s deteriorating water infrastructure while maintaining affordable water rates. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. Insight on the Issues, 56, p. 11.
58.
WeiserMazars. (2012). U.S. Water Industry Outlook. New York, NY: Author.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2006). 2006 Community Water System Survey, Volume I: Overview. Washington, DC: Author. (EPA 815-R-09–001)
61.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2008: Report to congress. Washington, DC: Author. (EPA-832-R-10–002)
62.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). 2009 Drinking water infrastructure needs survey and assessment: Fourth report to congress. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Septic (Onsite/Decentralized) Systems. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/septic/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). USA quick facts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
66.
WarnerM. E. (2008). Reverse privatization, rebalancing government reform: Markets, deliberation and planning. Policy and Society, 27, 163-174.
67.
WarnerM. E.HefetzA. (2012). Insourcing and outsourcing: The dynamics of privatization among U.S. municipalities 2002-2007. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78, 313-327.
68.
WilliamsonJ. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In WilliamsonJ. (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? (pp. 5-20). Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics.
69.
Xylem. (2012). Value of water index: Americans on the U.S. water crisis. White Plains, NY: Author.
70.
ZetlandD. (2011). The end of abundance: Economic solutions to water scarcity. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Aguanomics Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
