Assessing the Support for the Switch to Automated Collection of Solid Waste With Single Stream Recycling in Madison,Wisconsin

Abstract

The authors conduct a survey to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the switch to automated collection of solid waste with single stream recycling in Madison, Wisconsin. Because many respondents were unwilling to vote in favor of the new program at no additional cost, the authors examine the factors leading to this result. Study results indicate the probability of supporting the new program was lower for those older than age 50 years and for those who stated that sorting recyclables in the current system was convenient; individuals who identified with either the Democratic or Green Party were more likely to support the proposal. We believe the majority of “no” responses to this voting question are not protesting bids and, therefore, represent a true zero WTP. In addition, the authors believe city officials could have done more to influence the public’s perception of the new program in their effort to facilitate this change.

Keywords

solid waste management recycling single stream survey contingent valuation willingness-to-pay

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aadland, D. A. , & Caplan, A. J. (1999). Household valuation of curbside recycling. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(6), 781-799.

Aadland, D. A. , & Caplan, A. J. (2005). Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources? Unpublished manuscript.

Alberini, A. (1995). Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data. Land Economics, 71(1), 83-95.

Arrow, K. , Solow, R. , Portney, P. R. , Leamer, E. E. , Radner, R. , & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. 55 Fed. Reg. 10, 4601-4614.

Bateman, I. J. , Langford, I. H. , Turner, R. K. , & Willis, K. G. (1995). Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics, 12, 161-179.

Carson, R. T. (2000). Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(8), 1413-1418.

Dreckmann, G. P. (2004). Automated collection of recyclables and solid waste. Available at www.ci.madison.wi.us/streets/DreamTeamReport.pdf and www.ci.madison.wi.us/streets/Automated%2520Collection%2520Proposal.htm

Eureka Recycling . (2002). A comparative analysis of applied recycling collection methods in Saint Paul. Available at www.eurekarecycling.org/pdfs/studyreport.pdf

Glenn, J. (1999). The state of garbage in America. Biocycle, 60. Governmental Advisory Associates, Inc. Available at www.governmentaladvisory.com/

10.

Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

11.

Hanemann, M. , & Kanninen, B. (1998). The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data (Working Paper 798). Berkeley: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, University of California.

12.

Hanley, N. (1998). Contingent valuation as a means of valuing the conservation of coral reefs: An assessment of the method. Edinburgh, Scotland: Annex B, Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, University of Edinburgh. Available at www.cpacc.org/download/D0275_annexB.pdf

13.

Kaufman, S. M. , Goldstein, N. , Millrath, K. , & Themelis, N. J. (2004). The state of garbage in America. Biocycle, 45(1), 31-41.

14.

Kinnaman, T. C. (2000). Explaining the growth in municipal recycling programs: The role of market and nonmarket factors. Public Works Management & Policy, 5(1), 37-51.

15.

Kipperberg, G. , & Larson, D. (2005). Consumers’ preferences for different recycling programs. Unpublished manuscript.

16.

Lake, I. R. , Bateman, I. J. , & Parfitt, J. P. (1996). Assessing a kerbside recycling scheme: A quantitative and willingness to pay case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 239-254.

17.

Randall, A. (1997). The NOAA Panel Report: A new beginning or the end of an era? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5), 1489-1494.

18.

Skumatz, L. A. (2004). Single stream recycling: Total cost analysis [Prepared for The American Forest and Paper Association]. Available at www.serainc.com and www.afandpa.org

19.

Survey Sampling International. (n.d.). Available at www.surveysampling.com/

20.

Tiller, K. H. , Jakus, P. M. , & Park, W. M. (1997). Household willingness to pay for drop-off recycling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22(2), 310-320.

21.

Whitehead, J. C. (2000). A practitioner’s primer on contingent valuation (Working Paper 0008). Greenville, NC: East Carolina University, Department of Economics.

22.

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources . (2004). Frequently asked questions about single stream recycling in Wisconsin. Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/org/aw/wm/recycle/issues/singlestream.pdf