This study examines if and how drivers respond to tolls differently after implementation by analyzing drivers’ intention to pay tolls and toll avoidance behaviors. We apply the Theory of Planned Behavior to connect intention to pay and avoidance behavior to three categories of predictors: attitudes toward tolls, perceptions of toll benefits, and ability to pay. Since the theory does not explicitly consider factors such as past experience and changes in the decision-making process over time, we utilize three analytical approaches to examine: (1) if time affects intention to pay tolls and toll avoidance behavior; (2) pathways through which time makes a difference, and (3) how factors influencing intention behaviors change pre- and post-toll implementation. We find that time does in fact matter; there are direct and indirect pathways through which time makes a difference and time changes the strength of the relationships between intention to pay and behavior.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Congestion Charge Secretariat. (2006). Facts and results from the Stockholm trials (final version - December 2006). Stockholm: City of Stockholm.
5.
DaitoN.ChenZ.GiffordJ. L.PorterT., & GudgelJ. E. (2013). Implementing public private partnerships during challenging economic times: Case study of the 495 Express Lanes on the Virginia portion of the Washington Capital Beltway Project (USA). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 1(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2013.07.001
6.
DavisR.PatelY.MwalwandaC., & ReganE. (2018). The tradeoffs of tolling untolled roads. Transportation Research Record, 2672, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790125
7.
GehlertT.NielsenO. A. (2007). Triangulation of data sources for analysing car drivers' responses to road pricing in Copenhagen. Paper presented at the European Transport Conference 2007, 17-19 October 2007,Leiden, Netherlands.
8.
GibsonB.Van DykeC. W.WaddleS.KreisS. D. (2018). Review of state transportation funding initiatives. Report No. KTC-18-16/IS18-57-2-1F. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ktc_researchreports/1622/
9.
GreenS. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
HellevikO. (2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3
12.
HuangF. L. (2019). Alternatives to logistic regression models in experimental studies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1699769
13.
JaensirisakS.WrardmanM.MayA. D. (2005). Explaining variation in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39(2), 127–153.
14.
JagersS.MattiS.NilssonA. (2017). How exposure to policy tolls transforms the mechanisms behind public acceptability and acceptance - The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1197348
15.
JonesP. (1998). Urban road pricing: Public acceptability and barriers to implementation. In ButtonK. J.VerhoefE. T. (Eds.), Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment (pp. 263–284). Edward Elgar.
16.
KockelmanK. M.PodgorskiK.BinaM.GaddaS. (2012). Public perceptions of pricing existing roads and other transportation policies: The Texas perspective. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 48(3), 19-–38. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.207142
17.
LeeC.MillerJ. S. (2016). Conditions contributing to the attitudes for toll facilities in the United States with a specific focus on Virginia. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 43(10), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2016-0091
18.
LiebeU.PreisendörferP.MeyerhoffJ. (2010). To pay or not to pay: Competing theories to explain individuals' willingness to pay for public environmental goods. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509346229
19.
MeyerhoffJ.LiebeU. (2006). Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 583-–594. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021
20.
NicholsK. M. (2017). The state of transportation in Hampton Roads 2017. Chesapeake, VA: Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization.
21.
NicholsK. M., & BelfieldS. S. (2016). Impact of new tolls on existing roadway facilities: Hampton Roads, Virginia, experience. Transportation Research Record, 2597, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2597-04
22.
OdeckJ.BråthenS. (1997). On public attitudes toward implementation of toll roads—The case of Oslo toll ring. Transport Policy, 4(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-070x(97)00008-5
23.
OdeckJ.BråthenS. (2002). Toll financing in Norway: The success, the failures and perspectives for the future. Transport Policy, 9(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00030-6
24.
PeirceS.PuckettS.PetrellaM.MinniceP., & LappinJ. (2013). Effects of full-facility variable tolling on traveler behavior: Evidence from a panel study of the SR-520 Corridor in Seattle, Washington. Transportation Research Record, 2345, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.3141/2345-10
25.
PulipatiS. B.MattinglyS. P.CaseyC. (2017). Evaluating state level transportation revenue alternatives. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(3), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.06.002
26.
RienstraS. A.RietveldP.VerhoefE. T. (1999). The social support for policy measures in passenger transport: A statistical analysis for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 4(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9209(99)00005-x
27.
SchadeJ.BaumM. (2007). Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.008
28.
SchadeJ.SchlagB. (2003). Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(02)00046-3
29.
SchlagB., & TeubelU. (1997). Public acceptability of transport pricing. IATSS Research, 21(1), 134–142.
30.
SchuitemaG.StegL.ForwardS. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
StegL. (2003). Factors influencing acceptability and effectiveness of transport pricing. In SchadeJ. & SchlagB. (Eds.), Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 187–202). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
33.
SwimmerE.Gomez-IbanezJ. A.CasadyC. (2019). Toll-managed lane pioneers: Lessons from five US states. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(3), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.05.001
TretvikT. (2003). Urban road pricing in Norway: Public acceptability and travel behaviour. In SchadeJ.SchlagB. (Eds.), Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 77-–92). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
36.
UngemahD., & CollierT. (2007). I’ll tell you what I think! A national review of how the public perceives pricing. Transportation Research Record, 1996, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.3141/1996-09
WardmanM. (1998). A comparison of revealed preference and stated preference models of travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22(1), 71–91.
39.
Winslott-HiseliusL.Brundell FreijK.VaglandA.BystromC. (2009). The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30244-8
40.
YusufJ.-E. W.O’ConnellL.AnuarK. A. (2014). For whom the tunnel be tolled: A four-factor model for explaining willingness-to-pay tolls. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.021
41.
YusufJ.-E. W.O’ConnellL.AnuarK. A., & MaharK. (2015). Paying for infrastructure in an urban environment: Exploring the differing roles of ideological beliefs and self-interest in support for two funding mechanisms. Transportation Research Record, 2530, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2530-01
42.
YusufJ.-E. W.O’ConnellL.ChapmanD.JordanM. M.AnuarK. A. (2018). Getting the toll story about willingness-to-pay tolls. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 30(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2018-0022
43.
YusufJ.-E. W.O’ConnellL. L.CouncilD.AnuarK. A.ChapmanD.Vandecar-BurdinT.JordanM. M. (2019). Support for and behavioral responses to tolls: Insights from Hampton Roads, Virginia. In O. Smirnova (Eds.), Building a sustainable transportation infrastructure for long-term economic growth (pp. 113–144). IGI Global.
44.
YusufJ.-E. W.O'ConnellL.JordanM. M.ChapmanD., & AnuarK. A. (2021). Explaining drivers’ support for tolls and their toll avoidance behavior. Forthcoming inPublic Finance and Management.
45.
ZettelR. M.CarllR. R. (1964). The basic theory of efficiency tolls: The tolled, the tolled-off, and the un-tolled. Highway Research Record, 47, 46–65.
46.
ZmudJ.ArceC. (2008). Compilation of public opinion data on tolls and road pricing. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
