The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) mandates federal agencies to develop and link strategic plans and performance measures into a budgeting sys-tem that allocates resources based on performance. Because the Act only applies to federal agencies, not many local governments have adopted performance-based budgeting; however, most state governments have used it well ahead of the GPRA. This research focused on determining the extent of airport facilities'use of (a) performance measures,(b) strategic planning, and (c) whether performance measures and strategic planning are integrated into a performance-based budgeting system. A total of 21 professionally managed public airports were studied, representing a mix of airline-based and general aviation facilities. We found that although strategic planning is a management tool utilized by 40% of airport administrators, performance measures are sparingly used, and budget allocations are not based on performance. Furthermore, budgeting is not linked to strategic plans or performance measurement.
Barrett, K., Greene, R., & Mariani, M. (2002, February). Grading the counties: A management report card. Governing, 20-89.
3.
Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000, September/October). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform.Public Administration Review, 60, 409-420.
Chief Financial Officers Council. (1997). Integrating performance measurement into the budget process. Washington, DC: Chief Financial Officers Council GPRA Implementation Committee.
6.
Coe, C. (1999, March/April). Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major multigovernment efforts.Public Administration Review, 59, 110-123.
7.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
8.
Federal Aviation Administration. (2000). FAA long-range aerospace forecasts: Fiscal years 2015,2020 and 2025 (No.FAA-APO-00-5). Office of Aviation and Policy Plans.
Grifel, S. S. (1993). Performance measurement and budgetary decision making. Public Productivity & Management Review, XVI(4), 403-407.
13.
Humphreys, I., Francis, G., & Fry, J. (2002). Performance measurement in airports: A critical international comparison.Public Works Management & Policy, 6(4), 264-275.
International City/County Management Association & the Urban Institute. (1997). Comparative performance measurement: FY 95 data report. Washington, DC: ICMA & the Urban Institute.
16.
Jones, B. D. (1982). Assessing the products of government. In R. C. Rich (Ed.), Analyzing urban-service distributions (pp. 155-169). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
17.
Kopczynski, M., & Lombardo, M. (1999, March/April). Comparative performance measurement: Insights and lessons learned from a consortium effort. Public Administration Review, 59, 124-134.
18.
Kravchuk, R. S., & Schack, R. W. (1996). Designing effective performance measurement systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Public Administration Review, 56 (4), 348-358.
19.
Lu, H. (1998). Performance budgeting resuscitated: Why is it still inviable? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 10(2), 151-172.
20.
Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (1998, January-February). The State of the state: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58, 66-73.
21.
Mikesell, J. L. (2003). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishers.
22.
Nice, D. C. (2002). Public budgeting. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishers.
23.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999, July-August). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59, 325-335.
25.
Radin, B. A. (1998, July-August). The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA): Hydra-headed monster or flexible management tool? Public Administration Review, 58, 307-317.
26.
Rich, R. C. (Ed.). (1982). Analyzing urban-service distributions. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
27.
Ridley, C., & Simon, H. (1938). Measuring municipal activities: A survey of suggested criteria for appraising administration. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
28.
Rivenbark, W. C., & Kelly, J. M. (2000). Performance measurement: A local government response. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(1), 74-86.
29.
Taylor, F. (1912). Excerpt of testimony to a Special Committee of the House of Representatives to Investigate Taylor and Other Systems of Shop Management. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde, (Eds.), Classics of public administration. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
30.
Tigue, P. (1994, December). State of the art: Use of performance measures by GFOA members. Government Finance Review, 42-44.
31.
Tyer, C. (2000). Symposium on local government performance measurement and budgeting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(1), 44-48.
