Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Stem cells hold great potential in drug discovery and development. However, challenges remain to quantitatively measure the functions of stem cells and their differentiated products. Here, we applied fluorescent imaging, quantitative real-time PCR, and label-free dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) assays to characterize the differentiation process of the ReNcell VM human neural progenitor stem cell. Immunofluorescence imaging showed that after growth factor withdrawal, the neuroprogenitor stem cell was differentiated into dopaminergic neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, thus creating a neuronal cell system. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that the differentiated cell system released dopamine upon depolarization with KCl. In conjunction with quantitative real-time PCR, DMR assays using a G-protein-coupled receptor agonist library revealed that a subset of receptors, including dopamine D₁ and D₄ receptors, underwent marked alterations in both receptor expression and signaling pathway during the differentiation process. These findings suggest that DMR assays can decode the differentiation process of stem cells at the cell system level.

Keywords

dynamic mass redistribution assay differentiation dopamine receptors G-protein-coupled receptor neural progenitor stem cell

Introduction

With the identification of normal and cancerous stem cells and advances in stem cell biology have come widespread interest in the regulated differentiation of stem cells into tissue-specific cells for tissue repair¹ and to produce disease-relevant cells for drug discovery.² Essential to comprehend the potential of stem cells for regenerative medicine and drug discovery is determining the precise types and quality of differentiated cells derived from a specific stem cell or progenitor cell.^3,4 To meet this need, a variety of molecular profiling assays have been used to determine the in vitro differentiation process of stem cells. These assays measure specific cellular molecule(s) to infer the differences between a stem cell and its differentiated end product.^5,6 These assays have greatly advanced our understanding of stem cell biology. However, these assays only offer an end-point snapshot of stem cell differentiation and require destruction of stem cells for measurements. Furthermore, these assays often lack specificity due to redundancy of cellular markers in different types of cells. To overcome the limitations of molecular profiling assays, phenotypic assays have been applied to monitor stem cell differentiation in recent years. These phenotypic assays mostly use electric biosensors to minimal-invasively measure impedance of cultured stem cells on electrode surfaces.^7,8 However, none of these phenotypic studies has focused on characterizing stem cellular differentiation at the molecular or cellular pathway level. Innovative assays that bridge the gap between molecular and phenotypic assays would be desired for determining the precise types and quality of differentiated cells.

Here we describe a strategy to generate a global representation of stem cell differentiation at the receptome level using a label-free, whole-cell dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) assay. This strategy begins with DMR profiling of endogenous receptors at the receptome level using a library of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists, followed by similarity analysis to determine the differential patterns of functional receptor signaling between a stem cell and its differentiated products. Consequently, a small panel of receptor agonists can be downselected and used as functional markers to monitor the differentiation process of the stem cell. DMR assays use a label-free optical biosensor to noninvasively record a ligand-induced dynamic redistribution of cellular matter within ~150 nm of the sensor surface.⁹ The DMR is a highly textured phenotypic measurement of receptor signaling at the whole cell level.^10–13 GPCRs represent the largest and most successful drug target class in the human genome.¹⁴ Tissue-specific expression and preferential signaling are common to many GPCRs.^15–17 Thus, it is possible to use whole-cell functional readouts of receptors at the receptome level to determine the types and quality of differentiated products of stem cells. We demonstrate that this strategy provides a global view of the signaling pattern at the receptome level in a neuronal progenitor stem cell and its differentiated neuronal cells.

Materials and Methods

Materials

ACEA, adenosine, adenosine diphosphate (ADP), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), clonidine, dopamine, histamine, nicotinic acid, UDP, UTP, and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). (–)-Epinephrine, acetylcholine, anandamide, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), ghrelin, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), serotonin, and sphingosine-1-phospate (S1P) were obtained from Tocris Biosciences Co. (St. Louis, MO). (Arg⁸)-vasopressin, angiotensin, α-melanocortin (α-MSH), apelin, bombesin, bradykinin, calcitonin, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), dynorphin A, endothelin-1, galanin, glucagon-like peptide (GLP), glucagon, melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH), melatonin, neurokinin A, neuromedin U, human neuropeptide B-23 (NPB-23), neuropeptide Y, neurotensin, nociceptin, SFLLR-amide, SLIGKV-amide, somatostatin, substance P, urotensin II, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) were obtained from Bachem Americas, Inc. (Torrance, CA).

Epic 384-well biosensor microplates were obtained from Corning, Inc. (Corning, NY). Laminin-coated microplates were carried out by incubating the plates with 20 µL freshly prepared solution containing 20 µg/mL laminin (Sigma) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by aspirating the solution and washing twice. The freshly prepared laminin plates were used directly for cell culture.

The GPCR agonist library was prepared by dissolving small organic molecules and peptides in DMSO into 10 mM storage concentration, except for nucleotides including ATP, ADP, UDP, and UTP, which were dissolved in water, and lipid ligands including LPA, S1P, anandamide, PGE2, and PGD2, which were dissolved in 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution. Both mother and daughter plates were sealed and stored at −80 °C. Compound source plates were prepared freshly by diluting compounds in a daughter plate into 4× 10-µM solutions using 1× Hank’s balanced salt solution containing 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.1 (HBSS).

Neural Progenitor Cell Culture and Differentiation

ReNcell VM (ReN), an immortalized human neural progenitor cell line derived from the ventral mesencephalon from 10-week fetal neural tissue,¹⁸ was obtained from Millipore (Temecula, CA). The ReN cells were passaged using the protocol recommended by the supplier. Briefly, the cells were routinely expanded on laminin-coated T75 tissue culture flasks (Corning) in ReNcell NSC maintenance medium (Millipore) containing 20 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor–2 (FGF-2) and 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Millipore). The ReN cells in culture were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air/5% CO₂ with a daily medium exchange. The cells were passaged once a week using Accutase (Millipore).

Differentiation of the cells was achieved by plating the cells at about 60% confluency on a freshly laminin-coated flask and growing overnight in the presence of growth factors, followed by withdrawal of growth factors. Afterward, the media were replaced on alternate days up to 10 days during the differentiation culture.

Immunocytochemistry

For staining, both undifferentiated and differentiated ReNcell VM cells were fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde/phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and washed twice with PBS. The cells were then permeabilized and blocked with 5% normal goat serum (NGS) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The cells were stained using a mouse monoclonal anti-β-III tubulin antibody (MAB1637; Millipore) at 1:1000, a rabbit monoclonal anti–tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) antibody at 1:250 (AB152; Millipore), a mouse monoclonal antinestin at 1:500 (clone 10C2; Millipore), a rabbit polyclonal anti–glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) at 1:500 (AB5804; Millipore), or a mouse monoclonal anti-O1 antibody at 1:500 (catalog #2003601; Millipore). After overnight incubation at 4 °C, the cells were then washed twice with PBS and processed with filtered Cy3 dye–conjugated goat antimouse secondary antibody (1:250; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or FITC dye–conjugated goat antirabbit antibody (1:250; Molecular Probes) dissolved in 1% NGS in PBS for 1.5 h at room temperature. The cells were then washed twice with PBS and counterstained with 10 mM Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) for 4 min, followed by an additional PBS wash. For staining the surface marker O1 of oligodendrocytes, nonpermeabilized cells were also used to stain with the anti-O1 antibody at 1:500, followed by a nonpermeable blocking solution containing NGS in PBS. A Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was used to collect all fluorescence and light images.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from both undifferentiated and differentiated ReN cells using an RNeasy mini kit (cat. 74104; Qiagen, Valencia, CA). To eliminate genomic DNA contamination, on-column DNase digestion was performed using the RNase-free DNase set (cat. 79254; Qiagen). The concentration and quality of total RNA were determined using a Nanodrop 8000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Customized PCR array plates for 352 GPCR genes and reagents were ordered from SA Biosciences (a Qiagen company, Valencia, CA). About 1 µg total RNA was used for each 96-well PCR array. The PCR array was performed on an ABI 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Dopamine Release Assays with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

The differentiated ReN cells were treated with potassium chloride at various concentrations for 20 min in the growth factors–free maintenance media at room temperature. After KCl treatment, the media were collected and the dopamine concentration was assessed using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/electrochemical detection (ECD) method.¹⁹ The flow rate was 1 mL/min between 1 and 32 min with a gradient flow of methanol and phosphate buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate and 1.5 mg 1-pentanesulfonic acid, pH 3.0). The gradient started at 95/05 buffer/methanol and progressed to 5/95 buffer/methanol over 45 min. The column temperature was maintained at 35 °C. The electrochemical detector was Water’s 2645 ECD (Waters Corp., Milford, MA). The injection volume was 10 µL. Flow cell consisted of a 2-mm glassy carbon working electrode and an ISAAC (in situ Ag/AgCl) reference electrode (Wa60201; Waters Corp.). A freshly prepared dopamine solution was used as a positive control to validate the protocol.

Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assays

The ReN cells were seeded in a freshly prepared laminin-coated biosensor microplate at 3000 cells per well at passages 2 to 10 suspended in 50 µL of growth factors containing medium and were cultured at 37 °C under 5% CO₂ for 2 days to reach ~90% confluency. The undifferentiated cells were then washed twice with 1× HBSS and maintained in 30 µL HBSS for 1 h before commencing DMR assays. For differentiated cells, the undifferentiated cells at 80% confluency were subject to differentiation by replacing the growth factors containing medium with the growth factors–free maintenance medium for another 7 days. The differentiated cells obtained were then washed twice with 1× HBSS and maintained in 30 µL HBSS for 1 h before commencing DMR assays. To obtain DMR responses, an Epic wavelength interrogation system (Corning) was used for whole-cell sensing. This system consists of a temperature control unit (28 °C), an optical detection unit, and an on-board liquid-handling unit with robotics. The detection unit is based on integrated fiber-optics and enables kinetic measures of cellular responses with a time interval of ~15 s. Solutions of small molecules were made by diluting the stored concentrated solutions with HBSS and transferring into a 384-well polypropylene compound storage plate to prepare a compound source plate. Both cell plates and compound source plates were incubated within the biosensor reader system to reach thermal equilibrium (~1 h). After a 2-min baseline was recorded, compounds were transferred using the on-board liquid handler, and cellular responses induced by the compounds were then monitored in real time. At least two independent sets of experiments, each with at least duplicates, were performed. The assay coefficient of variation was found to be mostly <10%. All DMR signals were background corrected.

Results

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Differentiated ReN Cells

The ReNcell VM neural progenitor cell line has been shown to be capable of differentiating into astrocytic glial cells and neurons, about 10% of which have a dopaminergic phenotype after withdrawal of growth factors from the growth media.¹⁸ Light microscopic imaging showed that undifferentiated cells had a flat neuroepithelial morphology ( Fig. 1a ). Two days after withdrawal of growth factors, the cells started to differentiate ( Fig. 1b ). At days 5 and 7 of differentiation, most of the cells exhibited an elongated neural morphology ( Fig. 1c , d ). Immunostaining showed that 100% of the undifferentiated cells stained positively for the neural stem cell marker nestin ( Fig. 1e ); conversely, the differentiated cells had much weaker stain for nestin ( Fig. 1f ). There were few or no spontaneously differentiated cells within the control cells that were positive for GFAP (astrocytic) or β-III tubulin (neuronal) ( Fig. 1g ) or O1 (oligodendrocyte) (not shown). The differentiated cells gave rise to strong immunocytochemical staining for β-III tubulin ( Fig. 1h , i ). A relatively small percentage of the differentiated cells were also positive for GFAP ( Fig. 1h ), the catecholaminergic neuron marker TH ( Fig. 1j , k ), and the oligodendrocyte surface marker O1 ( Fig. 1l ). Together, these results suggest that the differentiated cells consist of mostly neurons and also contain other central nervous system cells, including astrocytes, dopaminergic neurons, and oligodendrocytes.

Figure 1.

Characteristics of neuronal cell systems derived from the differentiation of the ReNcell VM human progenitor cell line. (a–d) Light phase contrast microscopic images of ReNcells during the culture and differentiation processes. (a) Day 2 in the growth factors–containing medium; (b–d) 2, 5, and 7 days after the withdrawal of growth factors from the media, wherein the cells had been precultured for 2 days in the growth media. (e–l) Immunocytochemical staining of cells: antinestin in undifferentiated (e) and differentiated cells (f); anti–glial fibrillary acidic protein (green) and anti-β-III tubulin (red) in undifferentiated (g) and differentiated cells (h); anti-β-III tubulin (red) (i), anti–tyrosine hydroxylase antibody (green) (j), and their overlay (k) for the differentiated cells; and anti-O1 antibody for the differentiated cells. For e–l, the nuclei stain with Hoechst (blue) was included. The differentiated cells were obtained after a 2-day culture in the growth media, followed by a 7-day culture in the growth factors–free media. All scale bars are 100 µm.

Dopamine Release from the Differentiated ReN Cells

On the basis of the immunostaining results, we focused on the functional characterization of differentiated ReN cells obtained using the 7-day differentiation culture protocol. We estimated that about 13% of differentiated cells are TH+ ( Fig. 1j ). The positive staining of these cells with both anti-TH and anti-β-III tubulin ( Fig. 1k ) suggests that these cells may represent functional dopaminergic neurons. Thus, we first examined the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine from the differentiated cells upon depolarization by potassium chloride (KCl).^19,20 To do so, the cells were differentiated for 7 days in the growth factors–free media. After a 20-min treatment with KCl at different doses, the supernatants were then collected and subjected to analysis using the HPLC/ECD method. Using solutions of dopamine at known concentrations as controls, we found that the HPLC/ECD method gave rise to a detection limit about 400 pM, similar to previous reports.¹⁹ The differentiated cells exhibited a clear KCl dose-dependent release of dopamine, and dopamine was detected in the supernatants of these differentiated cells after being treated with 60 and 80 mM KCl ( Fig. 2 ), suggesting that the differentiated cells contain functional dopaminergic neurons.

Figure 2.

Dopamine release from the differentiated neural progenitor cells upon challenge with KCl at different doses: 0 mM (a), 40 mM (b), 60 mM (c), and 80 mM (d) for 20 min. The differentiated ReN cells were obtained after about a 7-day culture in the growth factors–free media.

Expression Analysis of GPCRs at the Receptome Level

We next performed quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of GPCRs at the receptome level using a customized RT-PCR plate containing 352 GPCRs and related genes from SA Biosciences. The undifferentiated ReN cells were compared with the differentiated ReN cells obtained from the 7-day differentiation culture. We first examined the expression of three control genes—glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-actin (ACTB), and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1)—at the mRNA level. Results showed that for the undifferentiated cells, the cycle threshold C_t values were 17.5 ± 0.4, 18.8 ± 0.5, and 24.0 ± 0.2 (n = 4) for GAPDH, ACTB, and HPRT1, respectively. A similar expression pattern was observed for the differentiated cells, which gave rise to C_t values of 18.3 ± 0.1, 17.5 ± 0.2, and 25.6 ± 0.3 (n = 4) for GAPDH, ACTB, and HPRT1, respectively.

We next examined the expression of 352 GPCRs at the mRNA level. Results showed that there were 104 GPCR genes whose C_t values were <30 for both undifferentiated and differentiated cells ( Table 1 ). Furthermore, there was a set of 13 GPCR genes, including ADRA2B, LPAR3, NTSR1, and P2RY12, with a C_t value of <30 in the undifferentiated cells but >30 in the differentiated cells. Conversely, a distinct set of 13 GPCR genes, including GRM7, DRD1, and GPR141, was specific to the differentiated cells. Therefore, 117 GPCR genes in total are expressed at a high or moderately high level in both undifferentiated and differentiated ReN cells. Of the 117 GPCR genes, only mRNAs for GPR141 were not detectable in the undifferentiated cells but at a moderately high level in the differentiated cells.

Table 1.

mRNA Expression of Endogenous G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Undifferentiated (ReN) and Differentiated (dReN) ReNcell VM Neural Progenitor Cells

Gene Symbol	C_{t, ReN}	C_t,dReN	dC_t	Gene Symbol	C_{t, ReN}	C_t,dReN	dCt
NTSR1	24.5	32.6	−8.1	FZD7	23.7	23.2	0.5
ADRA2B	24.4	31.2	−6.8	LGR6	25.6	25.0	0.6
LPAR3	28.6	33.1	−4.5	CCR10	29.1	28.5	0.6
MCHR1	25.3	29.3	−4.0	CELSR1	29.3	28.7	0.6
MTNR1B	29.3	33.2	−3.9	OPN3	25.9	25.3	0.6
P2RY12	28.3	31.1	−2.8	GPR27	27.5	26.9	0.7
RAMP2	28.2	30.6	−2.4	BAI2	24.9	24.2	0.7
GPR171	26.5	28.9	−2.4	CHRM3	27.0	26.3	0.7
P2RY13	28.6	30.9	−2.3	OXTR	26.7	26.0	0.7
GPR63	25.9	28.2	−2.3	GPR160	29.0	28.2	0.8
GPR30	29.1	30.8	−1.8	GPR19	27.7	26.9	0.8
HRH1	24.6	26.3	−1.7	OPRL1	29.1	28.2	0.9
GPR182	28.7	30.3	−1.7	GPR162	25.0	24.1	0.9
GPR3	26.7	28.4	−1.7	ADORA1	22.3	21.3	1.0
GPR87	28.2	29.8	−1.6	EDNRB	20.0	19.0	1.0
ADORA2B	23.7	25.2	−1.5	BAI3	26.0	25.0	1.0
P2RY14	28.3	29.8	−1.5	LPHN1	28.5	27.4	1.0
CXCR6	28.2	29.4	−1.3	S1PR1	29.1	27.9	1.2
FZD5	26.2	27.3	−1.1	SMO	26.7	25.3	1.3
MC1R	28.0	29.0	−1.1	LPHN2	23.4	22.1	1.4
CCRL1	28.0	28.9	−0.9	FZD1	25.3	23.9	1.4
BAI1	24.7	25.6	−0.9	GPR12	30.6	29.0	1.5
HTR1D	28.8	29.7	−0.9	DARC	29.2	27.6	1.6
LTB4R	28.5	29.4	−0.9	FZD4	28.8	27.1	1.7
LGR4	20.8	21.5	−0.7	GPR183	27.8	26.1	1.8
MRGPRF	29.1	29.8	−0.7	GPR56	24.2	22.4	1.8
SSTR2	29.9	30.6	−0.6	GABBR1	29.6	27.7	1.9
GNRHR	29.8	30.4	−0.6	FZD2	28.2	26.3	2.0
F2R	21.2	21.7	−0.5	F2RL1	29.4	27.5	2.0
EDNRA	29.8	30.3	−0.5	GPR35	30.2	28.2	2.0
GPR75	26.5	27.0	−0.5	P2RY2	31.2	29.1	2.1
GPR34	29.1	29.6	−0.5	FZD3	23.6	21.5	2.1
GPR52	29.9	30.4	−0.5	ADCYAP1R1	25.6	23.3	2.3
GPR153	28.3	28.7	−0.4	GPR18	26.9	24.6	2.3
GPR22	29.1	29.5	−0.4	FZD6	26.6	24.3	2.3
P2RY11	28.4	28.7	−0.3	GPRC5D	31.6	29.2	2.5
LGR5	22.1	22.5	−0.3	LPHN3	24.9	22.4	2.5
TACR1	29.1	29.4	−0.3	P2RY6	30.7	28.1	2.5
HTR2B	28.2	28.5	−0.2	GPRC5B	25.7	23.1	2.6
APLNR	28.9	29.1	−0.2	S1PR3	29.0	26.3	2.6
P2RY5	25.0	25.2	−0.2	CELSR2	27.8	25.1	2.7
GPR125	22.2	22.3	−0.1	GPR37L1	28.9	26.2	2.7
S1PR2	27.2	27.2	−0.1	RAMP1	25.8	23.1	2.8
GPR21	28.7	28.8	−0.1	CXCR4	25.2	22.3	2.9
TACR2	29.7	29.6	0.1	CCBP2	32.3	29.3	3.0
P2RY1	26.5	26.4	0.1	GPR98	25.8	22.7	3.1
LPAR2	27.4	27.3	0.1	BB1	32.2	29.0	3.2
ADORA2A	27.6	27.5	0.1	GPR123	28.3	24.9	3.4
GPR135	24.9	24.8	0.1	CALCRL	29.9	26.0	3.9
GPR146	27.5	27.4	0.1	BB2	33.9	29.8	4.1
GPR139	28.9	28.7	0.1	GRM7	32.3	27.6	4.7
CNR1	25.7	25.5	0.2	C5AR1	33.2	28.5	4.7
GPR82	29.3	29.0	0.2	CXCR7	27.4	22.7	4.7
GPR161	25.3	25.0	0.3	DRD4	27.0	22.0	5.0
GPR173	24.7	24.5	0.3	RAMP3	33.2	24.1	9.1
CD97	24.2	23.9	0.3	DRD1	39.0	29.4	9.6
GCGR	29.2	28.8	0.3	GPR141	Undetected	28.8	>11
CELSR3	29.4	29.0	0.4	GAPDH	17.5 ± 0.4	18.3 ± 0.1	−0.8
GABBR2	27.4	27.0	0.4	ACTB	18.8 ± 00.5	17.5 ± 0.2	1.3
OXER1	29.8	29.4	0.4	HPRT1	24.0 ± 0.2	25.6 ± 0.3	−1.6

Considering the comparable expression pattern of the three control genes in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells, we used the net difference in C_t value between the two cells for each GPCR gene to determine the changes of all 352 GPCR genes induced by differentiation. Comparative analysis showed that a subset of genes had undergone significant alterations in expression level during differentiation ( Fig. 3a ). Upon differentiation, noticeable upregulated genes were DRD1, DRD4, CRM7, C5AR1, BB1, BB2, CALCRL, RAMP1, RAMP3, CXCR4, P2RY6, GPR98, CCBP2, CXCR7, and GPR123; noticeable downregulated genes were ADRA2B, MTNR1B, MCHR1, NTSR1, and LPAR3. These results suggest that the ReN cell expresses quite a large set of GPCRs at the mRNA level, and a subset of GPCR genes undergoes significant up- and downregulation during the differentiation process.

Figure 3.

Receptor expression and dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) patterns. (a) Quantitative real-time PCR showing the differential expression of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) genes between the undifferentiated and differentiated ReN cells. (b) A false-colored heat map based on the DMR signals arising from a panel of GPCR agonists in both undifferentiated (ReN) and differentiated (dReN) cells. The signal amplitudes at discrete times, from 2 to 30 min from left to right with a 1-min incremental increase, were used to perform similarity analysis. The differentiated ReN cells were obtained after about a 7-day culture in the growth factors–free media. Both ReN and dReN cells had similar confluency (~90%) when commencing DMR assays.

DMR Profiling of Endogenous GPCRs

Since the DMR assay offers a pathway-unbiased yet pathway-sensitive measurement of receptor signaling at the whole cell level and has high sensitivity,^10,21 we profiled endogenous GPCRs using the DMR agonist assay in conjunction with a library of GPCR agonists. The DMR agonist assay directly measures the DMR signal arising from a GPCR agonist in real time without any manipulation of cells. The GPCR agonist library used was prepared in house and consists of 47 GPCR agonists that can theoretically activate over 110 known GPCRs (Supplementary Materials). All agonists were profiled at 10 µM. To visualize the patterns of DMR signals arising from GPCR agonists under different conditions, we used our recently developed similarity analysis approach.^22–24 This approach converts a ligand-induced DMR into a multidimensional coordinate such that all ligands tested can be compared using similarity analysis. Similarity analysis is a powerful means to determine the relationships (i.e., similarity or distances) among different biological responses, particularly for large sets of biological data.²⁵

DMR profiling of undifferentiated ReN cells using the GPCR agonist library showed that of the 47 agonists, 17 triggered detectable DMR signals whose amplitudes were greater than 45 pm, three times the standard deviation of the negative control (i.e., the DMR of the assay buffer only). These agonists include acetylcholine, adenosine, ADP, ATP, CGRP, dopamine, dynorphin A, endothelin-1, epinephrine, ghrelin, histamine, α-MSH, neuropeptide Y, neurotensin, substance P, SFLLR, and VIP. On the other hand, DMR profiling of differentiated cells showed that of the 47 agonists, 22 resulted in detectable DMR whose amplitudes were greater than 45 pm. These agonists include ACEA, acetylcholine, adenosine, ADP, ATP, apelin, CGRP, dopamine, dynorphin A, endothelin-1, GABA, glucagon, ghrelin, LPA, α-MSH, MCH, neuropeptide Y, NPB-23, PGE2, SLIGKV, SFLLR, and VIP. Similarity analysis showed that the DMR signatures arising from the same set of GPCR agonists were markedly distinct between the undifferentiated and differentiated cells ( Fig. 3b ).

Close examination of GPCR expression and DMR signals revealed the following interesting findings. First, for a group of GPCRs whose mRNA levels had barely changed during differentiation, we observed quite distinct DMR profiles from their cognate agonists. Specific examples include acetylcholine, adenosine, glucagon, and endothelin-1 ( Fig. 4 ). RT-PCR showed that for the muscarinic receptor family, both undifferentiated and differentiated cells expressed mRNAs only for CHRM3 with a comparable C_t value (27.0 vs. 26.3), whereas both cells expressed dominantly the mNRAs at the highest level for ADORA1 among the adenosine receptor family. Comparable expression level in both cells was found for glucagon receptor GCGR and endothelin receptor EDNRB. Considering that a ligand-induced DMR is a systems cell biology and pharmacology readout of receptor signaling,^9–13 the difference in DMR characteristics for these agonists suggests that the differentiation of ReN cells results in alteration in preferential signaling of certain endogenous GPCRs.

Figure 4.

The differential dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) signals of representative G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists in both undifferentiated (ReN) and differentiated (dReN) cells. (a) Acetylcholine, (b) adenosine, (c) glucagon, (d) endothelin-1, (e) epinephrine, (f) neurotensin, (g) adenosine triphosphate (ATP), (h) γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), (i) urotensin II, (j) neuropeptide B-23 (NPB-23), (k) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and (l) apelin. All agonists were assayed at 10 µM. The differentiated ReN cells were obtained after about a 7-day culture in the growth factors–free media. Both ReN and dReN cells had similar confluency (~90%) when commencing DMR assays. Data represent mean ± SD from two independent measurements, each in duplicate (n = 4).

Second, for a group of GPCRs whose mRNA levels were markedly altered during differentiation, we had also observed quite distinct DMR profiles from their cognate agonists. Specific examples include epinephrine, neurotensin, ATP, and GABA. For the adrenergic receptor family, only mRNAs for ADRA2B were detected in both cells, and its C_t value was increased from 24.4 to 31.2 after differentiation. Consistent with mRNA expression was the decreased DMR signal induced by epinephrine in the differentiated cells. mRNAs for NTSR1 were also markedly downregulated after differentiation, resulting in the disappearance of neurotensin-induced DMR in the differentiated cells. For the P2Y receptor family, mRNAs for P2RY1 and P2RY11 remained the same during the differentiation, whereas P2RY2 and P2RY6 were upregulated, and P2RY12, P2RY13, and P2RY14 were downregulated, collectively resulting in a distinct ATP DMR signal in the differentiated cells. Furthermore, consistent with the upregulation of GABBR1 and GABBR2 during differentiation was that GABA resulted in a robust DMR only in the differentiated cells.

Third, there was a small group of agonists whose DMR characteristics after differentiation cannot be explained by the expression of their known cognate receptors. These agonists include NPB-23, PGE2, and apelin. As a control, urotensin II expectedly did not trigger any obvious DMR in both cells since they do not express urotensin receptor. Neuropeptide B-23 was recently identified to be the natural agonist for both GPR7 (NPBW1) and GPR8 (NPBW2) receptors,²⁶ both of which were absent in the undifferentiated and differentiated cells. However, NPB-23 still triggered a robust DMR in the differentiated cells, suggesting that NPB-23 may activate another endogenous receptor, probably an unknown orphan GPCR. Similarly, none of known cognate receptors, including PTGFR, PTGER1, PTGER2, PTGER3, and PTGER4 for PGE2, was expressed at a high or moderate level in both cells, but PGE2 still resulted in a marked DMR in the differentiated cells. Conversely, apelin only resulted in a robust DMR in the differentiated cells, but its cognate receptor APLNR was expressed at an almost identical level in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells. Nonetheless, these results collectively suggest that the DMR assay indeed has high sensitivity to detect endogenous receptors, and the differentiation of the neural progenitor cells results in marked changes in the expression patterns and preferential signaling of endogenous receptors.

Pharmacological Characterization of ATP and Dopamine during Differentiation

Last, we performed pharmacological characterization of both ATP and dopamine during differentiation. ATP is a natural agonist for P2RY2, which is known to be expressed in astrocytes and to complex with both integrins and growth factor receptors to activate multiple signaling pathways, thus controlling reactive astrogliosis.²⁷ DMR agonist assays showed that ATP triggered a dose-dependent and saturable DMR response in both undifferentiated and differentiated cells but with distinct characteristics ( Fig. 5 ). First, ATP displayed higher potency in the undifferentiated cells than that in the differentiated cells. Based on the DMR amplitude at 10 min poststimulation, the EC₅₀ of ATP to trigger DMR in differentiated and undifferentiated cells was 39.9 ± 2.7 nM and 8.3 ± 0.6 nM (n = 4), respectively. Similarly, based on the DMR amplitude at 50 min poststimulation, its EC₅₀ was 193.0 ± 18.2 nM and 102.8 ± 10.5 nM (n = 4) for differentiated and undifferentiated cells, respectively. Second, the DMR characteristics at saturating doses were different between the two cells. In the undifferentiated cells, the ATP DMR consists of three phases: an early increased signal, followed by a small decaying signal and a subsequently small increased signal. However, the ATP DMR in the differentiated cells only consists of two phases. These differences suggest that P2Y receptor(s) exhibit different signaling pathway(s) during the differentiation process. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the difference in the signaling pathways and biological functions of P2Y receptors in this neural progenitor cell line.

Figure 5.

Dose responses of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). (a, b) Real-time dose-dependent responses of ATP in undifferentiated (a) and differentiated (b) cells. (c, d) The dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) amplitudes at 10 min (c) and at 50 min (d) poststimulation as a function of ATP doses in both cells. Data represent mean ± SD from two independent measurements, each in duplicate (n = 4).

The undifferentiated ReN cells only express mRNAs for DRD4 at a moderately high level (C_t, 27.0) among the dopamine receptor family. Upon differentiation, both DRD1 and DRD4 were found to be significantly upregulated ( Table 1 and Fig. 3a ). DRD1 is known to couple to the G_αs signaling pathway, and DRD4 is coupled to the G_αi signaling pathway. Increasing evidence suggests that the DMR assay offers an integrated response consisting of contributions with the two pathways via the activation of the two distinct receptors.^21,28,29 Results showed that dopamine triggered a detectable DMR in both cells with similar potency, but with distinct maximal amplitudes and characteristics ( Fig. 6 ). In the differentiated cells, its DMR amplitude was greater, and the kinetics for its initial increased signal was faster, compared with that in the undifferentiated cells. Further characterization of dopamine and other receptors was important to define signaling pathways that govern the differentiation process of ReNcell VM cells.

Figure 6.

Dose responses of dopamine. (a, b) Real time dose-dependent responses of dopamine in undifferentiated (a) and differentiated (b) cells. (c) The dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) amplitudes at 10 min and 50 min poststimulation as a function of dopamine doses in both cells. Data represent mean ± SD from two independent measurements, each in duplicate (n = 4).

Discussion

Human neuroprogenitor cells may represent a promising source for regenerative medicine³⁰ and a better cell model for identifying neurotoxic chemicals compared with conventional transformed cell lines and tissues.³¹ ReNcell VM is an immortalized human neuroprogenitor cell line and can be differentiated into astrocytic glial cells and neuronal cells.^18,32 Consistent with these studies, we had found that after withdrawal of growth factors from the growth media, the ReN cells were differentiated into a neuronal cell system consisting of astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes ( Fig. 1 ). Furthermore, the matured differentiation resulted in functional dopaminergic neurons, leading to release of dopamine after challenge with KCl ( Fig. 2 ). Quantitative RT-PCR showed that both undifferentiated and differentiated cells express mRNAs at a high and moderately high level for a large set of GPCRs ( Table 1 ), many of which are orphan GPCRs, suggesting that this neural progenitor cell line represents a good system for investigating orphan GPCRs. Orphan GPCRs whose expression levels are relatively high include GPR12, GPR19, GPR34, GPR123, GPR125, GPR135, GPR139, GPR141, GPR153, GPR173, and GPR182. Notably, both GPR123 and GPR141 were markedly upregulated during differentiation, suggesting the potential roles of both receptors in regulating the functions of the progenitor cells.

DMR profiling using a library of known GPCR agonists has led to novel findings. The DMR signals arising from these agonists were largely consistent with the expression patterns of their cognate GPCRs. However, the level of expression does not necessarily predict agonistic effects observed in DMR. Certain agonists, including adenosine and acetylcholine, triggered a DMR with altered characteristics in the differentiated cells, although their cognate receptor(s) remained largely unchanged after differentiation. Furthermore, a small group of agonists, including NPB-23, PGE2, and apelin, triggered a DMR in differentiated cells that is distinct from the control cells, and their DMR observed cannot be explained by the expression of their known cognate receptors. These results suggest that the differentiation of the neuroprogenitor cells results in marked changes in preferential signaling of these receptors, and there is another layer of regulatory activity in addition to the protein expression. This is consistent with recent findings that several signaling pathways are important to regulate the neural stem cell differentiation.^33–35 Furthermore, a subset of GPCRs, including neurotensin, glucagon, GABA, NPB-23, PGE2, and apelin, exhibited specificity to the differentiation process. Thus, these agonists can be used as functional markers to monitor the differentiation processes of ReNcell VM cells. It is worth noting that the differentiated ReN cells were obtained using the relatively short differentiation protocol (i.e., 7-day differentiation) and may not have reached full maturation. Thus, it is possible that certain GPCRs may not have reached functional states. Examining long-term differentiation and/or different differentiation protocols may reveal additional insights in the differentiation process of ReN cells. Nonetheless, we combined DMR assays with conventional technologies, including RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and HPLC, to characterize the differentiation of the ReNcell VM human neural progenitor cell line. The present study identified a panel of GPCRs that are divergent in their expression and signaling between the undifferentiated and differentiation cells, some of which can serve as surface markers to monitor the differentiation and quality control of neural progenitor cells.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplementary material for this article is available on the Journal of Biomolecular Screening Web site at .

References

Temple

Stem Cell Plasticity—Building the Brain of Our Dreams. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2, 513–520.

McNeish

Embryonic Stem Cells in Drug Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 70–80.

Rossi

Cattaneo

Neural Stem Cell Therapy for Neurological Diseases: Dreams and Reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3, 401–409.

Murry

C. E.

Keller

Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Clinically Relevant Populations: Lessons from Embryonic Development. Cell 2008, 132, 661–680.

Skalnikova

Vodicka

Gadher

S. J.

Kovarova

Proteomics of Neural Stem Cells. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2008, 5, 175–186.

Phanstiel

D. H.

Brumbaugh

Wenger

C. D.

Tian

Probasco

M. D.

Bailey

D. J.

Swaney

D. L.

Tervo

M. A.

Bolin

J. M.

Ruotti

. Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Comparison of Human ES and iPS Cells. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 821–827.

Bagnaninchi

P. O.

Drummond

Real-Time Label-Free Monitoring of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Differentiation with Electric Cell-Substrate Impedance Sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108, 6462–6467.

Reitinger

Wissenwasser

Kapferer

Heer

Lepperdinger

Electric Impedance Sensing in Cell-Substrates for Rapid and Selective Multipotential Differentiation Capacity Monitoring of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Biosensors Bioelectronics 2012, 34, 63–69.

Fang

Ferrie

A. M.

Fontaine

N. H.

Mauro

Balakrishnan

Resonant Waveguide Grating Biosensor for Living Cell Sensing. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 1925–1940.

10.

Fang

Label-Free Receptor Assays. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2010, 7, e5–e11.

11.

Kenakin

Cellular Assays as Portals to Seven-Transmembrane Receptor-Based Drug Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 617–626.

12.

Schröder

Janssen

Schmidt

Kebig

Merten

Hennen

Müller

Blättermann

Mohr-Andrä

Zahn

. Deconvolution of Complex G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in Live Cells Using Dynamic Mass Redistribution Measurements. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 943–949.

13.

Verrier

Ferrie

A. M.

Sun

Kyoung

Deng

Fang

Benkovic

S. J.

GPCRs Regulate the Assembly of a Multienzyme Complex for Purine Biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 909–915.

14.

Imming

Sinning

Meyer

Drugs, Their Targets and the Nature and Number of Drug Targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 821–834.

15.

Nelson

C. P.

Challiss

R. A.

“Phenotypic” Pharmacology: The Influence of Cellular Environment on G Protein-Coupled Receptor Antagonist and Inverse Agonist Pharmacology. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 73, 737–751.

16.

Butcher

A. J.

Prihandoko

Kong

K. C.

McWilliams

Edwards

J. M.

Bottrill

Mistry

Tobin

A. B.

Differential G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Phosphorylation Provides Evidence for a Signaling Bar Code. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 11506–11518.

17.

Kenakin

Miller

L. J.

Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Shapeshifting Proteins: The Impact of Allosteric Modulation and Functional Selectivity on New Drug Discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 2010, 62, 265–304.

18.

Hoffrogge

Mikkat

Scharf

Beyer

Christoph

Pahnke

Mix

Berth

Uhrmacher

Zubrzycki

I. Z.

. 2-DE Proteome Analysis of a Proliferating and Differentiating Human Neuronal Stem Cell Line (ReNcell VM). Proteomics 2006, 6, 1833–1847.

19.

Virag

Whittington

R. A.

Highly Sensitive Chromatographic Assay for Dopamine Determination during In Vivo Cerebral Microdialysis in the Rat. Chromatogr. B 2002, 772, 267–272.

20.

X. B.

S. H.

Rhee

Y. H.

Kim

Han

Y. M.

Lee

S. H.

Lee

Park

C. H.

Lee

Y. S.

Richardson

. Prolonged Membrane Depolarization Enhances Midbrain Dopamine Neuron Differentiation via Epigenetic Histone Modifications. Stem Cells 2011, 29, 1861–1873.

21.

Fang

Ferrie

A. M.

Non-invasive Optical Biosensor for Assaying Endogenous G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Adherent Cells. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2007, 55, 314–322.

22.

Fang

Probing Cancer Signaling with Resonant Waveguide Grating Biosensors. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2010, 5, 1237–1248.

23.

Ferrie

A. M.

Sun

Fang

Label-Free Integrative Pharmacology On-target of Drugs at the β₂-Adrenergic Receptor. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 33.

24.

Morse

Tran

Levenson

R. L.

Fang

Ligand-Directed Functional Selectivity at the mu Opioid Receptor Revealed by Label-Free On-target Pharmacology. PLoS One 2011, 6, e25643.

25.

Gehlenborg

O’Donoghue

S. I.

Baliga

N. S.

Goesmann

Hibbs

M. A.

Kitano

Kohlbacher

Neuweger

Schneider

Tenenbaum

. Visualization of Omics Data for Systems Biology. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, S56–S68.

26.

Fujii

Yoshida

Fukusumi

Habata

Hosoya

Kawamata

Yano

Hinuma

Kitada

Asami

. Identification of a Neuropeptide Modified with Bromine as an Endogenous Ligand for GPR7. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 34010–34016.

27.

Weisman

G. A.

Wang

Kong

Chorna

N. E.

Neary

J. T.

Sun

G. Y.

González

F. A.

Seye

C. I.

Erb

Molecular Determinants of P2Y2 Nucleotide Receptor Function: Implications for Proliferative and Inflammatory Pathways in Astrocytes. Mol. Neurobiol. 2005, 31, 169–183.

28.

Tran

Fang

Duplexed Label-Free G Protein-Coupled Receptor Assays for High Throughput Screening. J. Biomol. Screen. 2008, 13, 975–985.

29.

Tran

Sun

Fang

Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assays Decodes Surface Influence on Signaling of Endogenous Purinergic Receptors. Assays Drug Dev. Technol. 2012, 10, 37–45.

30.

Lindvall

Kokaia

Stem Cells in Human Neurodegenerative Disorders—Time for Clinical Translation?

J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 29–40.

31.

Breier

J. M.

Gassmann

Kayser

Stegeman

Groot

D. D.

Fritsche

Shafer

T. J.

Neural Progenitor Cells as Models for High-Throughput Screens of Developmental Neurotoxicity: State of the Science. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2010, 32, 4–15.

32.

Maltman

D. J.

Brand

Belau

Paape

Suckau

Przyborski

S. A.

Top-Down Label-Free LC-MALDI Analysis of the Peptidome during Neural Progenitor Cell Differentiation Reveals Complexity in Cytoskeletal Protein Dynamics and Identified Progenitor Cell Markers. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3992–4006.

33.

Lange

Mix

Frahm

Glass

Müller

Schmitt

Schmöle

A. C.

Klemm

Ortinau

Hübner

. Small Molecule GSK-3 Inhibitors Increase Neurogenesis of Human Neural Progenitor Cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 488, 36–40.

34.

Arsenijevic

Weiss

Schneider

Aebischer

Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Is Necessary for Neural Stem Cell Proliferation and Demonstrates Distinct Actions of Epidermal Growth Factor and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 7194–7202.

35.

Han

Wang

Xiao

Gao

Zhao

Zhang

Chen

Wang

Dai

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Is Involved in the Neuronal Differentiation of Neuronal Progenitor Cells Induced by Insulin. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2008, 39, 118–124.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.07 MB

0.00 MB

Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assay Decodes Differentiation of a Neural Progenitor Stem Cell

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Materials

Neural Progenitor Cell Culture and Differentiation

Immunocytochemistry

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Dopamine Release Assays with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assays

Results

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Differentiated ReN Cells

Dopamine Release from the Differentiated ReN Cells

Expression Analysis of GPCRs at the Receptome Level

DMR Profiling of Endogenous GPCRs

Pharmacological Characterization of ATP and Dopamine during Differentiation

Discussion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References

Supplementary Material