To examine whether children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can produce attentional orienting in response to gaze cues, and to identify which type of attentional orienting is impaired and why.
Method:
Two experiments employed a gaze cue–target paradigm using inhibition of return (IOR) as an indicator of exogenous attentional orienting. Experiment 1 used normal upright gaze faces as cues. Experiment 2 used inverted gaze faces as cues.
Results:
When normal gaze faces were used as the gaze cue, no IOR effect was observed in children with ADHD (Experiment 1); whereas when inverted gaze faces were used as the gaze cue, the IOR effect was produced in children with ADHD (Experiment 2).
Conclusion:
These results indicated that the ability to produce exogenous attentional orienting to the gaze cue is impaired in children with ADHD and that this impairment resulted from their reduced ability to exogenously orient to the intact face. These findings provide new evidence of social cognitive deficits and attentional orienting deficits in children with ADHD, and help provide support for children in educational settings.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
AstorK.LindskogM.ForssmanL.KenwardB.FranssonM.SkalkidouA.TharnerA.CasséJ.GredebäckG. (2020). Social and emotional contexts predict the development of gaze following in early infancy. Royal Society Open Science, 7(9), Article 201178. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201178
4.
BergerA.HenikA.RafalR. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.207
5.
BraithwaiteE. K.GuiA.JonesE. J. (2020). Social attention: What is it, how can we measure it, and what can it tell us about autism and ADHD?Progress in Brain Research, 254, 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.007
6.
BrignaniD.GuzzonD.MarziC. A.MiniussiC. (2009). Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.011
7.
CadeskyE. B.MotaV. L.SchacharR. J. (2000). Beyond words: How do children with ADHD and/or conduct problems process nonverbal information about affect?Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(9), 1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200009000-00016
8.
CalderA. J.LawrenceA. D.KeaneJ.ScottS. K.OwenA. M.ChristoffelsI.YoungA. W. (2002). Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00008-8
9.
CampbellJ. I.ThompsonV. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0
10.
ClementsK. M.DevonshireI. M.ReynoldsJ. N. J.OvertonP. G. (2014). Enhanced visual responses in the superior colliculus in an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and their suppression by d-amphetamine. Neuroscience, 274, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.05.054
11.
CohenJ. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
12.
DemirciE.ErdoganA. (2016). Is emotion recognition the only problem in ADHD? effects of pharmacotherapy on face and emotion recognition in children with ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 8, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-016-0201-x
DuPaulG. J.WeyandtL. L. (2006). School-based intervention for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on academic, social, and behavioural functioning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120600716141
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*power 3: Alexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
17.
FillmoreM. T.MilichR.LorchE. P. (2009). Inhibitory deficits in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Intentional versus automatic mechanisms of attention. Development and Psychopathology, 21(2), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000297
18.
FinziD.GomezJ.NordtM.RezaiA. A.PoltoratskiS.Grill-SpectorK. (2021). Differential spatial computations in ventral and lateral face-selective regions are scaffolded by structural connections. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22524-2
19.
FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208827
20.
FrischenA.SmilekD.EastwoodJ. D.TipperS. P. (2007). Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue. Visual Cognition, 15(8), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280601112493
21.
FrischenA.TipperS. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.516
22.
GauS. S. F.ShangC. Y.LiuS. K.LinC. H.SwansonJ. M.LiuY. C.TuC. L. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, version IV scale–parent form. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.237
23.
GauS. S.LinC. H.HuF. C.ShangC. Y.SwansonJ. M.LiuY. C.LiuS. K. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Version IV Scale-Teacher Form. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(8), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn133
24.
GaymardB.FrançoisC.PlonerC. J.CondyC.Rivaud-PéchouxS. (2003). A direct prefrontotectal tract against distractibility in the human brain. Annals of Neurology, 53(4), 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10560
25.
GoodaleM. A.ForemanN. P.MilnerA. D. (1978). Visual orientation in the rat: A dissociation of deficits following cortical and collicular lesions. Experimental Brain Research, 31, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00237301
26.
GrantynA.MoschovakisA. K.KitamaT. (2004). Control of orienting movements: Role of multiple tectal projections to the lower brainstem. Progress in Brain Research, 143, 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(03)43040-9
27.
GroomM. J.KochharP.HamiltonA.LiddleE. B.SimeouM.HollisC. (2017). Atypical processing of gaze cues and faces explains comorbidity between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1496–1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3078-4
28.
GuoJ.LuoX.WangE.LiB.ChangQ.SunL.SongY. (2019). Abnormal alpha modulation in response to human eye gaze predicts inattention severity in children with ADHD. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 38, Article 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100671
29.
HallC. L.GuoB.ValentineA. Z.GroomM. J.DaleyD.SayalK.HollisC. (2020). The validity of the SNAP-IV in children displaying ADHD symptoms. Assessment, 27(6), 1258–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119842255
30.
HaxbyJ. V.HoffmanE. A.GobbiniM. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0
HopfingerJ. B.WestV. M. (2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. NeuroImage, 31(2), 774–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.049
33.
IbáñezA.AguadoJ.BaezS.HuepeD.LopezV.OrtegaR.SigmanM.MikulanE.LischinskyA.TorrenteF.CetkovichM.TorralvaT.BekinschteinT.ManesF. (2014). From neural signatures of emotional modulation to social cognition: Individual differences in healthy volunteers and psychiatric participants. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(7), 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst067
34.
ItierR. J.TaylorM. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhg111
35.
ItierR. J.VillateC.RyanJ. D. (2007). Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: Evidence from eye movement monitoring. Neuropsychologia, 45(5), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.004
36.
JinglingL.LinH. F.TsaiC. J.LinC. C. (2015). Development of inhibition of return for eye gaze in adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.001
37.
JonesA.ForsterB. (2014). Neural correlates of endogenous attention, exogenous attention and inhibition of return in touch. European Journal of Neuroscience, 40(2), 2389–2398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12583
38.
KleinC. H.RaschkeA.BrandenbuschA. (2003). Development of pro–and antisaccades in children with attention–deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and healthy controls. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00003
KovalM. J.ThomasB. S.EverlingS. (2005). Task-dependent effects of social attention on saccadic reaction times. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0206-8
42.
LangtonS. R.BruceV. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/135062899394939
43.
LiC. S. R.ChangH. L.LinS. C. (2003). Inhibition of return in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000297
44.
MaozH.GvirtsH. Z.ShefferM.BlochY. (2019). Theory of mind and empathy in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 23(11), 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054717710766
45.
MarottaA.CasagrandeM.RosaC.MaccariL.BerlocoB.PasiniA. (2014). Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23, 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0505-8
46.
MarottaA.PasiniA.MenottiE.PasquiniA.PitziantiM. B.CasagrandeM. (2017). Controlling attention to gaze and arrows in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 251, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.094
47.
MarottaA.PasiniA.RuggieroS.MaccariL.RosaC.LupiáñezJ.CasagrandeM. (2013). Inhibition of return in response to eye gaze and peripheral cues in young people with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1636-3
48.
Martín-ArévaloE.KingstoneA.LupiáñezJ. (2013). Is “inhibition of return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
McKayK. T.GraingerS. A.CoundourisS. P.SkorichD. P.PhillipsL. H.HenryJ. D. (2021). Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 147(12), 1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000353
52.
MeierN. M.PerrigW.KoenigT. (2012). Neurophysiological correlates of delinquent behaviour in adult subjects with ADHD. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.011
53.
MillerR. G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. Springer New York.
54.
MilnerA. D.ForemanN. P.GoodaleM. A. (1978). Go-left go-right discrimination performance and distractibility following lesions of prefrontal cortex or superior colliculus in Stumptail macaques. Neuropsychologia, 16(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(78)90062-3
55.
MortonJ.JohnsonM. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.164
56.
NguyenK. N.WatanabeT.AndersenG. J. (2020). Role of endogenous and exogenous attention in task-relevant visual perceptual learning. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0237912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237912
57.
OvertonP. G. (2008). Collicular dysfunction in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Medical Hypotheses, 70(6), 1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.11.016
58.
PitcherD.DuchaineB.WalshV. (2014). Combined TMS and fMRI reveal dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static face perception. Current Biology, 24(17), 2066–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.060
59.
PitcherD.UngerleiderL. G. (2021). Evidence for a third visual pathway specialized for social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.006
PosnerM.CohenY. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531–556.
62.
PrattJ.HillisJ.GoldJ. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196183
63.
RafalR. D.CalabresiP. A.BrennanC. W.ScioltoT. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(4), 673. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.673
64.
ReiersenA. M.ConstantinoJ. N.VolkH. E.ToddR. D. (2007). Autistic traits in a population-based ADHD twin sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01720.x
RizzolattiG.RiggioL.DascolaI.UmiltáC. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8
67.
RobertsonI. (1987). Sociology (3rd ed.). Worth.
68.
SaleraC.BocciaM.PecchinendaA. (2024). Segregation of neural circuits involved in social gaze and non-social arrow cues: Evidence from an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 34(2), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09593-4
69.
ShepherdS. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00005
70.
ShinD. W.LeeS. J.KimB. J.ParkY.LimS. W. (2008). Visual attention deficits contribute to impaired facial emotion recognition in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropediatrics, 39(06), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1202286
71.
SinghS. D.EllisC. R.WintonA. S.SinghN. N.LeungJ. P.OswaldD. P. (1998). Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification, 22(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980222002
72.
SwansonJ. M.KraemerH. C.HinshawS. P.ArnoldL. E.ConnersC. K.AbikoffH. B.ClevengerW.DaviesM.ElliottG. R.GreenhillL. L.HechtmanL.HozaB.JensenP. S.MarchJ. S.NewcornJ. H.OwensE. B.PelhamW. E.SchillerE.SevereJ. B.SimpsonS., . . . WuM. (2001). Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200102000-00011
73.
TangX.GaoY.YangW.RenY.WuJ.ZhangM.WuQ. (2019). Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 1093–1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05488-0
TheeuwesJ.GodijnR. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 764–770. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194743
76.
TipplesJ. (2005). Orienting to eye gaze and face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.843
77.
TipplesJ. (2008). Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.1.77
78.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.MarcusD. J.WesterlundA.CaseyB. J.NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
79.
UonoS.EgashiraY.HayashiS.TakadaM.UkezonoM.OkadaT. (2023). Reduced gaze-cueing effect with neutral and emotional faces in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 168, 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.045
80.
Van BelleG.De GraefP.VerfaillieK.RossionB.LefevreP. (2010). Face inversion impairs holistic perception: Evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. Journal of Vision, 10(5), 10. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.5.10
WhiteH. A. (2007). Inhibitory control of proactive interference in adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 11(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054706295604
84.
WilliamsL. M.HermensD. F.PalmerD.KohnM.ClarkeS.KeageH.ClarkC. R.GordonE. (2008). Misinterpreting emotional expressions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for a neural marker and stimulant effects. Biological Psychiatry, 63(10), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.11.022
85.
WilliamsL. M.LiddellB. J.RathjenJ.BrownK. J.GrayJ.PhillipsM.YoungA.GordonE. (2004). Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: An integration of central and peripheral measures. Human Brain Mapping, 21(2), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10154
86.
YuillN.LyonJ. (2007). Selective difficulty in recognising facial expressions of emotion in boys with ADHD. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 16(6), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-007-0612-5
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
