Attention does not always help: The role of expectancy,divided,and spatial attention on illusory conjunctions

Abstract

Humans have the subjective impression of a rich perceptual experience, but this perception is riddled with errors that might be produced by top-down expectancies or failures in feature integration. The role of attention in feature integration is still unclear. Some studies support the importance of attention in feature integration, whereas others suggest that feature integration does not require attention. Understanding attention as a heterogeneous system, in this study, we explored the role of divided (as opposed to focused—Experiment 1) attention, and endogenous–exogenous spatial orienting (Experiments 2 and 3) in feature integration. We also explored the role of feature expectancy, by presenting stimulus features that were completely unexpected to the participants. Results demonstrated that both endogenous and exogenous orienting improved feature integration whereas divided attention did not. Moreover, a strong and consistent feature expectancy effect was observed, demonstrating perceptual completion when an unexpected perceptual feature was presented in the scene. These results support the feature confirmation account, which proposes that attention is important for top-down matching of stable representations.

Keywords

Divided attention endogenous exogenous illusory conjunctions orienting spatial attention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arend

Naparstek

Henik

(2013). Numerical-spatial representation affects spatial coding: Binding errors across the numerical distance effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0428-x

Aru

Bachmann

(2017). Expectation creates something out of nothing: The role of attention in iconic memory reconsidered. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.017

Aru

Tulver

Bachmann

(2018). It’s all in your head: Expectations create illusory perception in a dual-task setup. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.09.001

Block

(2011). Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(12), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001

Braet

Humphreys

G. W.

(2009). The role of reentrant processes in feature binding: Evidence from neuropsychology and TMS on late onset illusory conjunctions. Visual Cognition, 17(1–2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280802193318

Briand

K. A.

(1998). Feature integration and spatial attention: More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1243–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1243

Briand

K. A.

Klein

R. M.

(1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.228

Carrasco

Barbot

(2014). How attention affects spatial resolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 79, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024687

Chica

A. B.

Bartolomeo

(2012). Attentional routes to conscious perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00001

10.

Chica

A. B.

Bartolomeo

Lupiáñez

(2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027

11.

Chica

A. B.

Bartolomeo

Valero-Cabré

(2011). Dorsal and ventral parietal contributions to spatial orienting in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 8143–8149. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5463-10.2010

12.

Chica

A. B.

Bayle

D. J.

Botta

Bartolomeo

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

(2016). Interactions between phasic alerting and consciousness in the fronto-striatal network. Scientific Reports, 6(1), Article 31868. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31868

13.

Chica

A. B.

Botta

Lupiáñez

Bartolomeo

(2012). Spatial attention and conscious perception: Interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 621–629.

14.

Chica

A. B.

Lasaponara

Chanes

Valero-Cabré

Doricchi

Lupiáñez

Bartolomeo

(2011). Spatial attention and conscious perception: The role of endogenous and exogenous orienting. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0082-6

15.

Chica

A. B.

Lasaponara

Lupiáñez

Doricchi

Bartolomeo

(2010). Exogenous attention can capture perceptual consciousness: ERP and behavioural evidence. NeuroImage, 51(3), 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.002

16.

Chica

A. B.

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

Valero-Cabre

Bartolomeo

(2013). Neural bases of the interactions between spatial attention and conscious perception. Cerebral Cortex, 23(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs087

17.

Chica

A. B.

Valero-Cabre

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

Bartolomeo

(2014). Causal contributions of the left frontal eye field to conscious perception. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs357

18.

Cohen

Rafal

R. D.

(1991). Attention and feature integration: Illusory conjunctions in a patient with a parietal lobe lesion. Psychological Science, 2(2), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00109.x

19.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

20.

Colás

Triviño

Chica

A. B.

(2017). Interference control modulations over conscious perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00712

21.

Corbetta

Patel

Shulman

G. L.

(2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017

22.

de Gardelle

Sackur

Kouider

. (2009). Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.002

23.

Dehaene

Bossini

Giraux

(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. insights.ovid.com

24.

Dehaene

Changeux

J. P.

(2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018

25.

Dux

P. E.

Marois

(2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(8), 1683–1700. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.8.1683

26.

Esterman

Prinzmetal

Robertson

(2004). Categorization influences illusory conjunctions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196620

27.

Esterman

Verstynen

Robertson

L. C.

(2007). Attenuating illusory binding with TMS of the right parietal cortex. NeuroImage, 35(3), 1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.039

28.

Fan

Mccandliss

Fossella

Flombaum

Posner

(2005). The activation of attentional networks. NeuroImage, 26(2), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004

29.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

30.

Fischer

M. H.

Castel

A. D.

Dodd

M. D.

Pratt

(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1066

31.

Fischer

M. H.

Shaki

(2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition—From single digits to arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1461–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.927515

32.

Fritz

C. O.

Morris

P. E.

Richler

J. J.

(2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

33.

Gillebert

C. R.

Humphreys

G. W.

(2010). The decomposition of visual binding over time: Neuropsychological evidence from illusory conjunctions after posterior parietal damage. Visual Cognition, 18(7), 954–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280903356764

34.

Goldstein

E. B.

(2013). Sensation & perception. Cengage Learning.

35.

Goss-Sampson

(2019). Statistical analysis in JASP: A guide for students. JASP. https://jasp-stats.org/jasp-materials/

36.

Grubb

M. A.

Behrmann

Egan

Minshew

N. J.

Heeger

D. J.

Carrasco

(2013). Exogenous spatial attention: Evidence for intact functioning in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Vision, 13(14), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.14.9

37.

Hansen

Pracejus

Gegenfurtner

K. R.

(2009). Color perception in the intermediate periphery of the visual field. Journal of Vision, 9(4), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.4.26

38.

Harris

J. J.

Schwarzkopf

D. S.

Song

Bahrami

Rees

(2011). Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychological Science, 22(3), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611399293

39.

Henderson

C. M.

(2014). The binding problem and the perception of multiple stimuli [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University]. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10608091

40.

Henderson

C. M.

McClelland

J. L.

(2020). Intrusions into the shadow of attention: A new take on illusory conjunctions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 564–584. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01893-3

41.

Hochstein

Ahissar

(2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36(5), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7

42.

Humphreys

G. W.

(2016). Feature confirmation in object perception: Feature integration theory 26 years on from the Treisman Bartlett lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(10), 1910–1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.988736

43.

Koch

Tsuchiya

(2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012

44.

Kok

Mostert

de Lange

F. P.

(2017). Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10473–10478. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705652114

45.

Kouider

de Gardelle

Sackur

Dupoux

(2010). How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.006

46.

Krajcsi

Kojouharova

(2017). Symbolic numerical distance effect does not reflect the difference between numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02013

47.

Kuhn

Rensink

R. A.

(2016). The vanishing ball illusion: A new perspective on the perception of dynamic events. Cognition, 148, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.003

48.

Kusnir

Chica

A. B.

Mitsumasu

M. A.

Bartolomeo

(2011). Phasic auditory alerting improves visual conscious perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.012

49.

Lavie

(2006). The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research, 1080(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.023

50.

Lavie

(2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410370295

51.

F. F.

VanRullen

Koch

Perona

(2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(14), 9596–9601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.092277599

52.

Mack

Erol

Clarke

Bert

(2016). No iconic memory without attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 40, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.12.006

53.

Martens

Wyble

(2010). The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.005

54.

Martín-Signes

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

Chica

A. B.

(2018). Connectivity of frontoparietal regions reveals executive attention and consciousness interactions. Cerebral Cortex, 29(11), 4539–4550. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy332

55.

Matthews

Schröder

Kaunitz

van Boxtel

J. J. A.

Tsuchiya

(2018). Conscious access in the near absence of attention: Critical extensions on the dual-task paradigm. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1755), Article 20170352. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0352

56.

Montaser-Kouhsari

Rajimehr

(2005). Subliminal attentional modulation in crowding condition. Vision Research, 45(7), 839–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.020

57.

Moore

C. M.

Yantis

Vaughan

(1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00019

58.

Mordkoff

J. T.

Halterman

(2008). Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.2.385

59.

Murphy

Groeger

J. A.

Greene

C. M.

(2016). Twenty years of load theory—Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1316–1340. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5

60.

Paul

Schyns

P. G.

(2003). Attention enhances feature integration. Vision Research, 43(17), 1793–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00270-0

61.

Pelli

D. G.

Palomares

Majaj

N. J.

(2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.12.12

62.

Pelli

D. G.

Tillman

K. A.

(2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11(10), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2187

63.

Pelli

D. G.

Tillman

K. A.

Freeman

Berger

T. D.

Majaj

N. J.

(2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.20

64.

Petersen

A. H.

Bundesen

Vangkilde

Habekost

(2017). The effect of phasic auditory alerting on visual perception. Cognition, 165, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.004

65.

Petersen

S. E.

Posner

M. I.

(2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525

66.

Posner

M. I.

(1994). Review attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 7798–7403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.16.7398

67.

Prinzmetal

Henderson

Ivry

(1995). Loosening the constraints on illusory conjunctions: Assessing the roles of exposure duration and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1362–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1362

68.

Prinzmetal

Presti

D. E.

Posner

M. I.

(1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.12.3.361

69.

Rensink

R. A.

O’Regan

J. K.

Clark

J. J.

(1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x

70.

Rodríguez-San Esteban

Chica

A. B.

Paz-Alonso

P. M.

, (2022). Functional characterization of correct and incorrect feature integration. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac147

71.

Schneider

Eschman

Zuccolotto

(2002). E-Prime: User’s guide. Psychology Software Inc.

72.

Shafritz

Gore

Marois

(2002). The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 10917–10922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.152694799

73.

Shore

D. I.

McLaughlin

E. N.

Klein

R. M.

(2001). Modulation of the attentional blink by differential resource allocation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 55(4), 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087379

74.

Simons

D. J.

Ambinder

M. S.

(2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00332.x

75.

Treisman

A. M.

(1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5

76.

Treisman

A. M.

Gelade

(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

77.

Treisman

A. M.

Schmidt

(1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8

78.

Vandierendonck

(2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0721-5

79.

Verguts

Van Opstal

(2005). Dissociation of the distance effect and size effect in one-digit numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 925–930. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196787

80.

Viarouge

Hubbard

E. M.

McCandliss

B. D.

(2014). The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: An individual differences approach. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e95756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095756

81.

Whitney

Levi

D. M.

(2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005

82.

Wokke

M. E.

Vandenbroucke

A. R. E.

Scholte

H. S.

Lamme

V. A. F.

(2013). Confuse your illusion: Feedback to early visual cortex contributes to perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 24(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449175

83.

Wolfe

Robertson

(2012). From perception to consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman. Oxford University Press.

84.

Wyart

Tallon-Baudry

(2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(10), 2667–2679. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4748-07.2008

85.

Yeshurun

Rashal

(2010). Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. Journal of Vision, 10(10), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.10.16