Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Adult Self-Report Scale-5 (the ASRS-5-AR) within a large sample of adults residing in Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study applied the ASRS-5-AR to a random sample of 4,299 Saudi and non-Saudi adults, aged 19 to 66 years (31.16 ± 9.26 years), living in the regions of Riyadh, Makkah, and the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia. Collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26, JASP 0.18.3.0 software, and MedCalc 22.030 statistical software.

Results:

The ASRS-5-AR demonstrated strong internal consistency, with all six items showing significant positive correlation with the total score (.675–.735). Results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed a goodness-of-fit coefficient of 0.983 for the one-factor model and McDonald’s omega, Cronbach’s α, and Spearman-Brown coefficients of 0.786, 0.788, and 0.724, respectively. In addition, the findings revealed statistically significant differences in self-reported ADHD symptoms based on age (F = 18.68; p < .001), level of education (F = 2.61; p < .05), and marital status (F = 22.30; p < .001). However, there were no significant differences in self-reported ADHD symptoms between males and females (t = 0.625; p > .05) or Saudi and non-Saudi participants (t = 0.409; p > .05) or based on region of residence (t = 2.19; p > .05).

Conclusions:

This study provides valuable insights into the psychometric properties of the ASRS-5-AR within a large sample of adults in Saudi Arabia. The findings demonstrate acceptable reliability of the ASRS-5-AR within this population. While these findings suggest the ASRS-5-AR may be a useful tool for initial assessment, further research is crucial. Future studies should focus on establishing accurate cutoff scores by comparing a general population sample with a clinically diagnosed sample of adults with ADHD in Saudi Arabia. This will allow for a more accurate evaluation of the scale’s utility in identifying individuals who may require further clinical assessment.

Keywords

ADHD adults ASRS-5-AR attention deficit hyperactivity SEM

Introduction

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder typically diagnosed during childhood years, can manifest with symptoms that persist into adulthood. Over the past 10 years, the prevalence of ADHD among adults has increased by 123% (Chung et al., 2019). There has also been a rise in the awareness of ADHD in adults and an increase in the numbers of adults seeking diagnosis. Those two factors alongside the evolving diagnostic criteria of the DSM-5 have driven the demand for reliable, evidence-based assessment methods for this underdiagnosed population (Kooij et al., 2019).

Data on the prevalence of ADHD have been conflicting. In one meta-analysis, Willcutt (2012) reported that the prevalence of ADHD among adults according to studies conducted in the United States, Iran, Colombia, and Australia was 5%, which was 1.5- to 2.3-times higher than rates reported by European studies. Prevalence among older adults was reported by Dobrosavljevic et al. (2020) to be 2.18%. According to another meta-analysis, reviewing 2346 global studies, persistent ADHD (that is, ADHD manifesting in childhood and continuing to adulthood) was found to be prevalent among 2.58% of adults, while the prevalence of symptomatic ADHD reached 6.67%, indicating that there were approximately 139.84 million and 366.33 million adults, respectively, with ADHD globally (Song et al., 2021). Recent reports for ADHD prevalence in the Middle East and North Africa show ranges from 1.3% to 22.2%, and the rate is higher in adults (13.5%) than in children and adolescents (10.10%) (Al-Wardat et al., 2024).

Studies also indicate that the disorder is more prevalent among men than women, young adults compared with older adults, divorced individuals compared with people who are unmarried, and people who have high income compared with those of low income (Hargitai et al., 2023). Other reports, however, show no differences in prevalence between countries of low, middle, and high income (Cortese et al., 2023).

Symptoms of ADHD in adults include impulsivity, restlessness, disorganization, problems concentrating, poor time management skills, problems focusing on a specific task, poor listening skills, and difficulty relaxing. Compared with children who have ADHD, adults are less likely to be hyperactive, and, thus, symptoms may be less noticeable in adults (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Faraone et al., 2003). In addition, ADHD symptoms can make everyday tasks more difficult and contribute to problems like missing meetings or social plans and difficulty setting priorities, focusing, and completing tasks (Canu et al., 2020; Chung et al., 2019; Hargitai et al., 2023; Lutfi, 2022). ADHD is also associated with greater mortality by unnatural causes (Cortese et al., 2023).

Kessler et al. (2005) noted that developing measures to assess ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults is challenging, because symptoms continuously change throughout development. According to Niina et al. (2022), symptoms of ADHD differ at ages 7, 17, and 25 years. At age 7, fidgeting, talking excessively, and being easily distracted are most common. At age 15, common symptoms include being easily distracted, having difficulty organizing, and avoiding task that require concentration; while at age 25, difficulty calming down, feeling frustrated, difficulty organizing, and being easily distracted are the most common symptoms. Consequently, Haavik et al. (2010) pointed out that the diagnostic evaluation of adults with ADHD should include symptoms other than those typically seen in children, including mood instability, frustration intolerance, anxiety, personality disorders, and symptoms of comorbid psychological disorders. They also emphasized that it is important the evaluation be based on a combination of assessments including clinical interviews, rating scales for previous and current symptoms, and additional information from multiple raters for those symptoms to develop appropriate therapeutic interventions according to the diagnostic features.

There are various scales to assess ADHD in adults, based on the individual’s current ADHD symptoms, functional impairment, quality of life, and the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. The most widely accepted tools that allow for retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD symptoms are the Wender Utah Rating Scale and Barkley and Murphy’s Childhood Symptoms Scale. Widely used self-reported rating scales include the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (1997), the Current Symptoms Scale by Barkley and Murphy (1998), the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) by Kessler et al. (2005), and the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Self Report Scale (ADHD-SR) by Rösler et al. (2004). All of these scales assess ADHD based on DSM criteria, while the Wender-Reimherr Interview uses a different diagnostic algorithm (Rösler et al., 2006).

It is crucial to identify ADHD in individuals because of the significant personal, familial, and social costs involved; however, diagnosing the condition remains a challenge, typically relying on the DSM for the general population (Perera et al., 2020). To address the need for a tool to screen for ADHD in adults in the general population, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-version 1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) in collaboration with the WHO International Composite Diagnostic Interview. The tool is available in two versions: a full version, with 18 questions, and a shortened version, with six questions (Kessler et al., 2005). The ASRS-v1.1 was developed based on the 18 diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV-TR, such as trouble wrapping up, difficulty organizing, problems with remembering, fidgeting, and being overly active, organized in two parts. Part A consists of six questions that are more predictive of ADHD symptoms, and Part B contains 12 questions (Adler et al., 2019).

The ASRS is a valuable tool used to identify adults who require a more comprehensive assessment for ADHD. Its credibility and reliability for use with the general population have been confirmed in various studies (Anbarasan et al., 2020). According to reports, the short, six-item, version has shown greater sensitivity (68.7%), specificity (99.50%), and symptom concordance (0.08) compared with the full version (Garland, 2006), and it should be preferred in community studies or clinical outreach programs for raising awareness and detecting cases (Kessler et al., 2005). Therefore, Garland recommended using the short version to diagnose ADHD among adults for both community and clinical purposes.

There are two commonly used versions of the ASRS: the previously mentioned ASRS-v1.1 and the ASRS-5. The ASRS-v1.1 was developed in 2005 and has since been translated into 20 languages. The ASRS-5 was developed in 2017, calibrated according to the criteria of the DSM-5 (Ustun et al., 2017). Naturally, to date, there are fewer studies verifying the psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the ASRS-5 compared with the ASRS-v1.1 (Ziobrowski et al., 2023). The ASRS-5 was translated into the Italian language by Somma et al., in 2021, who reported it to be a psychometrically sound self-reported instrument that can be used safely and reliably to diagnose symptoms of ADHD in both adolescents and adults. Baggio et al. (2021) verified the psychometric properties of the French version of the ASRS-5 on a sample of 557 adults, and their results showed that the tool had good validity and reliability indexes. Their sample consisted of outpatients with no comorbid disorders. The ASRS-5 was found to be a good predictor of ADHD, with a cutoff score of 13/24, sensitivity of 84.3%, and specificity of 91.9%. The tool was also translated into the German language by Ballmann et al. (2022) who verified its psychometric properties on a sample of 262 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, in the primary care setting. The scale showed good psychometric properties (sensitivity, 95.60%; specificity, 72.30%), and results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the best fit was achieved for the general factor with one correlated error.

Objectives

This study represents one of the rare community surveys screening for ADHD in adults in different regions of Saudi Arabia. It aims to verify the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the ASRS-5 (ASRS-5-AR) and to detect differences in ADHD screening based on sociodemographic characteristics. The study helps to raise awareness of ADHD in the society and detect cases in the general population that require comprehensive diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

Participants and Procedures

This study utilized a convenience sampling method. Participants were recruited from public areas such as markets, gardens, and public squares in the regions of Riyadh, Makkah, and the Eastern Province. The inclusion criterion was adults aged 18 years or older. Individuals who had a prior diagnosis of a neurological or psychiatric disorder other than ADHD were excluded. While randomization was not feasible due to the inherent limitations of convenience sampling, efforts were made to enhance sample diversity by recruiting participants from various locations across the three regions and at different times throughout the data collection period.

Data were collected from participants between January 27 and October 8, 2023, after the researchers received ethical approval. Informed consent was obtained from all participants; 196 individuals declined to participate due to lack of time or unwillingness. Following institutional approval, trained research assistants were recruited to administer the ASRS-5-AR to participants through individual self-reporting. The final study sample consisted of 4299 Saudi and non-Saudi adults residing in Saudi Arabia, with an age range of 19 to 66 years (31.16 ± 9.26 years).

Measure

To measure the symptoms of ADHD, the researchers applied the Arabic version of the ASRS-5. Since the ASRS-5 had not been previously used in the local context intended for this study, it underwent a rigorous translation process. A forward translation was conducted by an independent bilingual translator from English into Arabic. Subsequently, a different independent bilingual translator back-translated the Arabic version into English. Following this, the two translators, in conjunction with the current researcher, compared both versions and made necessary modifications to ensure accuracy and cultural appropriateness. The finalized Arabic version was then labeled “ASRS-5-AR.”

The ASRS-5-AR consists of the following six items: “How often do you have difficulty concentrating on what people are saying to you even when they are speaking to you directly? How often do you leave your seat in meetings or other situations in which you are expected to remain seated? How often do you have difficulty unwinding and relaxing when you have time to yourself? When you’re in a conversation, how often do you find yourself finishing the sentences of the people you are talking to before they can finish them themselves? How often do you put things off until the last minute? How often do you depend on others to keep your life in order and attend to details?” The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and very often) with scores ranging from 0 to 24. Ustun et al. applied the ASRS-5 to a sample of 637 participants and showed that the scale has good psychometric properties when used on a general population sample (sensitivity, 91.4%; specificity, 96%) compared with a clinical sample (sensitivity, 91.90%; specificity, 74%).

Statistical Analysis

The demographic characteristics of the study participants were computed in percentages. Means and standard deviations were used for the ASRS-5-AR criteria. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to verify internal consistency between the six items of the ASRS-5-AR and its total score, and Cronbach’s α and split-half by Spearman-Brown and Guttmann coefficients were used to verify reliability. Structural equation modeling was performed for confirmatory factor analysis (Cheung et al., 2024) to assess the tool’s psychometric properties. We performed the statistical analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26) and JASP 0.18.3.0 software.

Results

Participant Sociodemographic Characteristics

The sample consisted of 4,299 adults (2,550 men and 1,749 women) 19 years old and over residing in Saudi Arabia. Among the sample, 3,888 were of Saudi nationality and 411 were non-Saudi. Also, 1,612 resided in the city of Riyadh, 1,962 in Makkah, and 725 in the Eastern Province. The majority were married (2,224) and educated up to secondary school (1,204) (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Participant Sociodemographic Characteristics.

Sociodemographic characteristics	No. (%)
Participants
Gender
Male	2,550 (59.32%)
Female	1,749 (40.68%)
Region
Riyadh	1,612 (37.50%)
Makkah	1,962 (45.64%
Eastern Province	725 (16.86%)
Nationality
Saudi	3,888 (90.44%)
Non-Saudi	411 (9.56%)
Level of education
Middle school	192 (4.47%)
Secondary school	1,204 (28.01%)
Bachelor’s	1,911 (44.45%)
Diploma	714 (16.60%)
Master’s	207 (4.81%)
PhD	71 (1.65%)
Marital status
Single	1,770 (41.17%)
Married	2,224 (51.73)
Divorced	243 (5.65%)
Widowed	1.44%)

Internal Consistency of the ASRS-5-AR

The results shown in Table 2 indicate that the ASRS-5-AR has good reliability. All six items showed significant positive correlation with the scale’s total score (correlation coefficient ranged from 0.675 to 0.735). McDonald’s omega, Cronbach’s α, and Spearman-Brown reliability coefficients were all acceptable (0.786, 0.788, and 0.724, respectively).

Table 2.

Correlation of the ASRS-5-AR Items for Adults.

Factor	Correlation with ASRS-5-AR
Difficulty concentrating on what people are saying	.735**
Leave your seat in meetings or other situations	.682**
Difficulty unwinding and relaxing	.703**
Finishing the sentences	.686**
Put things off until the last minute	.713**
Depend on others	.675**
Cronbach’s α	.788
Coefficient ω	.786
Spearman-Brown Coefficient	.724

ASRS-5-AR = Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5-Arabic.

Correlation between the items and the total score of the ASRS-5-AR was significant at .01 level.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Based on the results of the study conducted by Ballmann et al. (2022), the best fit was achieved for a general factor of the ASRS-5 German version. Also, the results of Somma et al.’s (2021) study showed that the ASRS-5 is a one-factor instrument that is valid and reliable in diagnosing ADHD in Italy. However, in the current results, structural equation modeling was performed to estimate the ASRS-5-AR one-factor standard model validity using JASP 0.18.3.0 software. Results are shown in Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 1.

Table 3.

Model Goodness-of-Fit Indices for the ASRS-5-AR.

Index	Value
Comparative Fit Index (CFI)	0.936
Tucker-Lewis’s index (TLI)	0.893
Bentler-Bonett non-normed fit index (NNFI)	0.893
Bentler-Bonett normed fit index (NFI)	0.935
Bollen’s relative fit index (RFI)	0.891
Bollen’s incremental fit index (IFI)	0.936
Goodness-of-fit index (GFI)	0.983

Table 4.

Factor Loadings for the ASRS-5-AR.

Factor with its inducators						95% Confidence Interval
Factor	Indicator	Estimate	Std. Error	z-value	p	Lower	Upper
Factor 1	Difficulty concentrating on what people are saying	0.765	0.016	46.992	<.001	0.733	0.797
	Leave your seat in meetings or other situations	0.677	0.017	40.930	<.001	0.645	0.710
	Difficulty unwinding and relaxing	0.734	0.018	41.190	<.001	0.699	0.769
	Finishing the sentences	0.689	0.019	36.833	<.001	0.653	0.726
	Put things off until the last minute	0.752	0.020	37.841	<.001	0.713	0.791
	Depend on others	0.651	0.018	36.558	<.001	0.616	0.686

Figure 1.

Confirmatory structural equation model for the ASRS-5-AR for adults using JASP 0.18.3.0 software.

As shown in Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 1, the ASRS-5-AR had good goodness-of-fit indices: comparative fit index was 0.936; Tucker-Lewis’s index was 0.893; Bentler-Bonett normed fit index was 0.935; and the goodness-of-fit index was 0.983. All mentioned indices were within an acceptable range, and all paths between the items and the general factor ranged between 0.58 and 0.71, which were significant (p < .001).

Normative Data of the ASRS-5-AR

Normative data were weighted for the participants’ self-assessment of their ADHD symptoms according to gender and age group. Table 5 shows means, standard deviations, and percentiles for participant total scores on the ASRS-5-AR.

Table 5.

Normative Data for the Ratings of Adults on the ASRS-5-AR in Saudi Arabia.

ASRS-5-AR Norms
Percentile
Age	N	M	SD	80^th	90th	93^rd	98th
Males
19–24	689	8.82	4.67	13.00	15.00	16.00	19.00
25–29	709	8.54	4.20	12.00	14.00	15.00	17.00
30–34	502	7.24	4.99	10.00	14.00	15.00	22.00
35–39	315	8.52	4.50	12.00	14.00	16.00	18.00
40–44	168	8.39	5.88	12.00	16.10	18.17	24.00
45–49	79	9.43	6.48	13.00	23.00	24.00	24.00
50–54	54	6.30	4.03	10.00	11.00	12.00	16.70
55–59	21	5.72	4.59	9.60	10.80	14.68	—
60–64	10	8.40	3.02	12.40	13.00	—	—
65 years and over^a	3	7.00	3.46	—	—	—	—
Females				Percentile
19–24	422	10.62	4.26	14.00	16.00	16.00	19.00
25–29	416	7.93	3.58	11.00	12.00	13.00	16.00
30–34	302	7.38	4.78	11.00	13.00	15.00	18.00
35–39	241	7.58	6.02	12.00	16.00	18.06	24.00
40–44	168	8.24	5.44	12.00	16.00	18.00	24.00
45–49	83	5.55	4.90	10.00	12.60	16.00	18.32
50–54	55	4.96	3.66	9.00	10.40	11.00	12.76
55–59	31	5.48	3.07	8.00	9.80	11.52	—
60–64	22	8.04	2.82	11.00	11.70	12.00	—
65 years and over	9	6.00	4.87	11.00	—	—	—

This specific value (age 65+, male group) should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and potential for limited reliability.

The results show a variety of scores on the ASRS-AR according to age group and gender (Table 5). For example, in young adult males, 19 to 24 years old (n = 689), 80% scored below 13 on the ASRS-5-AR, while 20% scored over 13. Ninety percent scored below 15, and 10% scored over 15, and so on. In the sample of females of the same age group (n = 422), 80% scored below 14, while 20% scored over 14. Also in this group, 98% obtained scores below 19 on the scale, while only 2% obtained a scores above 19, and so on. If we look at males 60 to 64 years old (n = 10), 90% scored below 13, while 10% scored over 13 on the scale. In females of the same age group (n = 22), 90% scored below 11.70, while 10% obtained scores over 11.70. None of the males 65 years and older (n = 3) obtained a score on the ASRS-5-AR. However, for the females of the same age group (n = 9), 80% obtained scores below 11, and 20% scored over 11.

Differences in ADHD Screening According to Sociodemographic Characteristics

We used t-tests and ANOVA to detect differences based on gender, nationality, age group, residential region, marital status, and level of education. The results are shown in Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6.

Differences Between Males and Females in ASRS-5-AR Results.

Variable	Group	N	M	SD	t-test	Sig. (two-tailed)
Gender	Male	2550	8.30	4.79	0.625	0.532
Gender	Female	1749	8.21	4.84	0.625	0.532
Nationality	Saudi	3888	8.273	4.754	0.409	0.682
Nationality	Non-Saudi	411	8.161	5.355	0.409	0.682

Table 7.

Differences in ASRS-5-AR Scores Based on Sociodemographic Characteristics.

Variable	Group	N	M	SD	F	Sig.
Age	19–24	1,111	9.50	4.66	18.68	0.000
	25–29	1,125	8.31	3.99
	30–34	804	7.29	4.91
	35–39	556	8.11	5.23
	40–44	336	8.31	5.66
	45–49	162	7.44	6.03
	50–54	109	5.62	3.87
	55–59	52	5.60	3.72
	60–64	32	8.16	2.84
	65 years and over	12	6.25	4.434
Region	Riyadh	1,612	8.07	4.84	2.19	0.112
	Makkah	1,962	8.40	4.70
	Eastern Province	725	8.31	5.06
Marital status	Single	1,770	7.69	5.05	22.30	0.000
	Married	2,224	8.83	4.56
	Divorced	243	7.47	4.71
	Widowed	62	7.22	4.60
Level of education	Middle school	192	7.55	4.92	2.61	0.023
	Secondary school	1,204	8.62	4.70
	Bachelor’s	1,911	8.20	4.80
	Diploma	714	8.04	4.80
	Master’s	207	8.24	5.14
	PhD	71	7.93	5.48

There were no significant statistical differences in ASRS-5-AR scores between males (8.30 ± 4.79) and females (8.21 ± 4.84) (t = 0.625; p value = .532 > .05) or Saudi (8.273 ± 4.754) and non-Saudi (8.161 ± 5.355) participants (t = 0.409; p value = .682 > .05).

As shown in Table 7, total scores differed significantly based on age group (sum of squares between groups = 3,757.074, within groups = 95,846.954, total = 99,604.028; F = 18.68; p value = .000 < 0.001), marital status (sum of squares between groups = 1,527.798, within groups = 98,076.230, total = 99,604.028; F = 22.30; p value = .000 < .001), and level of education (sum of squares between groups = 302.104, within groups = 99,301.924, total = 99,604.028; F = 2.61, p value = .023 < .05). However, total scores showed no significant differences based on region of residence (sum of squares between groups = 101.586, within groups = 99,502.442, total = 99,604.028; F = 2.19; p value = .112 > .001).

We employed Tukey’s test to determine the direction of the differences in scores within the age, marital status, and level of education subgroups. The results revealed that adults aged 19 to 24 years had significantly higher mean scores compared with the other age groups (means of differences = 1.1867, 2.206, 1.386, 1.187, 2.055, 3.876, and 3.903); all of the mean differences were significant (p value = .000 < 0.05) using the harmonic mean sample size (63.707) (Figure 2). Also, individuals who were widowed had significantly higher mean ASRS-5-AR scores compared with those who were married, single, divorced, or separated (mean differences = 1.145, 1.365, 1.608; p value = .000 < .05) (Figure 3). Adults with a secondary school educational level had significantly higher mean ASRS-5-AR scores (mean difference = 1.07; p value = .048) compared with those with a middle school level of education, using the harmonic mean sample size (223.229) (Figure 4)

Figure 2.

Means plot for different age groups.

Figure 3.

Means plot of different marital-status groups.

Figure 4.

Means plot of different level-of-education groups.

Discussion

This study aimed to verify the psychometric properties of the ASRS-5 among adults in the Saudi environment, extract normative data for future screening purposes, and examine the association between ASRS-5 score and several demographic variables in a large sample of adults from the general population. It is important to note that this study did not involve a clinical sample and, therefore, does not provide a basis for ADHD screening or diagnosis. While the present study provides preliminary normative data on ADHD symptoms in the Saudi Arabian population, it is important to acknowledge that some unexpected trends in ASRS-5-AR scores were observed across age groups. These variations may be attributed to several factors, including the sample variability inherent in the convenience sampling method, the potential influence of unmeasured confounding factors such as socioeconomic status, occupation, and lifestyle, and the potential impact of age-related life events and transitions on ADHD symptom presentation. Further research with larger and more representative samples is warranted to investigate these observed trends and explore the underlying factors contributing to the observed variability in ADHD symptoms.

In the current study, the ASRS-5-AR showed good internal consistency indicators, as its six items exhibited significant positive correlation with the scale’s total score (ranging from .675 to .735). The scale also exhibited good psychometric indicators, based on structural equation modeling, that matched the empirical data collected from the participants. The standard model’s goodness-of-fit coefficient was .95, indicating a good fit. The scale also showed good reliability indicators when applied to adults (ω coefficient = .786; Cronbach’s α = .788; and Spearman-Brown coefficient = .724).

This study also examined normative data collected from the large sample of adults, results of which revealed variable performance on the ASRS-5 related to age group. After comparing these results with total scores from previous studies in the literature, we can state that a total score of 12 or 13, as reported in the literature, would result in a positive screening for approximately 20% of Saudi adults (those scores fall approximately under the 80th percentile for most subgroups in Table 5). Thus, the higher total scores might result in fewer cases being identified, which might not be preferable given the clinician’s goals and the balance between the actual prevalence of ADHD in adults and the risk of missing actual cases.

However, these results on ASRS-5 norms in a general population sample are still uncertain due to the lack of clinical evidence. We recommend conducting a future study for precise determination of the cutoff score by comparing population and clinical samples. As Harrison and Edwards (2023) concluded in their meta-study, the diagnosis of ADHD cannot be based solely on such measures, but rather more rigorous evaluation must be conducted for people who screen positive for ADHD. Similarly, cutoff scores for diagnosing ADHD through measurement scales cannot be decisive, as Sonnby et al. (2014) concluded in their study.

In addition, we cannot be certain that the appearance of ADHD symptoms in the general population is caused by the disorder, because most adults occasionally have problems with inattention, impulsivity, distractibility, and insomnia; nonetheless, ADHD often manifests as problems related to executive function that can lead to many difficulties in managing daily life. Further, ADHD symptoms are not unique to ADHD alone, but are indeed part of most other disorders (e.g., concentration problems and restlessness in anxiety or concentration problems and psychomotor agitation observable to others in depression). To put it differently, ADHD is a disorder that does not have any unique symptoms.

Interestingly, the current study detected no statistically significant differences between males and females in total score on the ASRS-5-AR (t = 0.625; p > .05), contrary to results reported by previous studies. Lutfi (2022) found differences in ADHD in favor of males. Yáñez-Téllez et al. (2021) reported that ADHD was more prevalent among males (22.14%) than females (13%). In the more recent meta-analysis by Al-Wardat et al. (2024), the prevalence was also higher in males (11.10% vs. 7%). Al-Masry (2012) and Al-Shahrani (2019), however, found the disorder to be more prevalent among females. These conflicting results may be due to different assessment tools used for screening. We also found no statistically significant differences in ASRS-5-AR total score between Saudi and non-Saudi adults (t = 0.409; p > .05), which may be explained by the fact that all of the participants were residents of Saudi Arabia, and they and their families received the same health services and social support.

However, total score showed statistically significant differences based on age (F = 18.68; p < .001), educational level (F = 2.61; p < .05), and marital status (F = 22.30; p < .001). Other studies have found ADHD to be more prevalent in younger adults. ADHD usually appears at an early age and may continue to advanced stages, causing significant deficiency in academic, social, and occupational performance (Bálint et al., 2009; Canu et al., 2020; Klassen et al., 2010; Kwon et al., 2018; Lutfi, 2022; Sobanski et al., 2007). On the other hand, a meta-analysis by Ramos-Quiroga et al. (2013) reported that older adults were more likely to report ADHD symptoms than younger adults. According to Ayano et al. (2023) ADHD prevalence is high among adults, at 3.10%. Widowed adults scored higher for distress, as a result of difficult living conditions and, perhaps, experiencing a lack of attention and support.

Region of residence did not show a significant association with total score (t = 2.19; p > .05), as is consistent with Lutfi’s (2022) findings. However, in some reports, adults in lower economic environments scored higher for ADHD symptoms than those in higher economic environments (Russell et al., 2016; Zwirs et al., 2007). The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia cares for its citizens of all ages and in all regions of the country and provides them with health and social services (Saudi Vision 2030, 2016).

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate that the Arabic version of the ASRS-5 has strong psychometric properties, with good indicators of internal consistency and reliability, making it a suitable tool for assessing ADHD symptoms in Arabic-speaking populations. It is important to note that this study did not involve a clinical sample and, therefore, does not provide a basis for ADHD screening or diagnosis. Future research should investigate the clinical utility of the ASRS-5-AR in a clinical setting to establish its validity and reliability for the diagnosis of ADHD in the Saudi population.

Study Strengths and Limitations

This study has several strengths, including the large and diverse sample of adults residing in various regions of the country, which provides valuable insights into the characteristics of the ASRS-5 within this population. Also, the inclusion of a broad demographic spectrum enhances the generalizability of the findings to a significant portion of the adult Saudi population.

However, this study has limitations. As a descriptive, cross-sectional survey, it cannot establish causal relationships or draw final conclusions about the prevalence of ADHD in the Saudi population. The absence of clinical assessments prevents the determination of accurate cutoff scores for the ASRS-5 and limits its use for screening or diagnosing ADHD in this context. Future research should include clinical evaluations to establish more precise cutoff scores and investigate the prevalence of ADHD using a combination of assessment methods.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants and parents for their interest and willingness to contribute to this study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Saudi ADHD Society (Project number 03). The funders had roles in the study’s design, data collection, analysis, the decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Research Ethics Committee at the Saudi ADHD Society approved this study (Approval no.23-06). All methods were carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Ethics

The Saudi ADHD Society Ethics Review Committee approved our study (approval: IRB-06-23) on July 10, 2023. Respondents gave written consent for review and signature before starting the survey.

ORCID iDs

Mohammed M. J. Alqahtani

Nader Alrahili

Fawwaz Abdulrazaq Alenazi

Abdulkarim Alhossein

Yasser Jubran Alqahtani

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are fully available upon reasonable request.

Author Biographies

Mohammed M. J. Alqahtani is a Full Professor & Consultant of Clinical Psychology with a distinguished career in research, academia and psychotherapy. Graduating from the Medical College at Liverpool University in 2006 with a PhD in Clinical Psychology, he have since spearheaded numerous national research projects as a Principal Investigator and provided expert consultancy on grant procurement, demonstrating a strong commitment to advancing knowledge in the field. Currently serves as a Scientific and Health Advisor at the Saudi ADHD Society, and Chairs the Scientific “National Survey ADHD” within the organization.

Nouf Mohammed Al Saud is the Co-Primary Investigator for this project. She is the CEO of the King Khalid Foundation. A leading non-profit organization in Saudi Arabia, the foundation’s goal is to create equal opportunities for all Saudis by: maximizing the impact of NGOs, encouraging national companies to adopt environmental and social sustainability practices, investing in projects to increase skills of disadvantaged groups, producing evidence-based research and providing policy solutions to Saudi decision-makers to help build a viable social protection system in Saudi Arabia. She also leads the foundation’s global thought leadership around the promotion of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and protecting inclusive growth. In 2020, she chaired the Civil 20 Engagement Group, one of the G20 engagement groups, representing the perspectives and voices of global civil society to G20 Leaders.

Nawal Mohammed Alsharef is the Co-Primary Investigator on this project, she is the CEO of the Saudi ADHD Society, a dedicated advocate for individuals with ADHD in Saudi Arabia. Ms. Alsharef is committed to maximizing the impact of NGOs in improving the lives of those affected by ADHD.

Ahmad N. AlHadi is a Full Professor and Consultant in psychiatry and psychotherapy at the department of psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He is the director of SABIC psychological health research and applications chair. His main research interest is in psychotherapy assessment and intervention, and medical education.

Saleh Mohammed Alsalhi is an Assistant Professor and Consultant, developmental and behavioral pediatrics, princes nourah bint Abdulrahman university, chairman of national scientific committee on developmental disorders, and lead experts in developmental and behavioral disorders in Saudi centeral board for accreditation of health institutions (CBAHI) and the Saudi health council (SHC).

Elham H. Al-Hifthy is a Consultant developmental pediatrician and an assistant professor of pediatrics. She is the program director of the developmental and behavioral pediatrics fellowship program at KKAUH. She has worked as the vice dean of quality and development and the vice dean of educational affairs in the college of medicine, PNU . her work focuses on development disabilities and their effect on the quality of life of the children and their families

Yasser Ad-Dab’bagh is a Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, neuroscientist and psychoanalyst at King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. He completed his residency and fellowship and conducted his neuroscience research at McGill University, Montreal QC, Canada and was assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada. He presently leads the project for a Saudi National Strategy for Mental Health, Addictions and Developmental Disorders, and has lead the development of mental health research priorities for the Saudi National Institute for Health Research.

Nader Alrahili is a Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist: Department of psychiatry, college of Medicine, Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. He is is the co-Author for this manuscript.

Fawwaz Abdulrazaq Alenazi he received a bachelor degree in Medicine 1999, received Pediatric Residency 2004, he received training in developmental & behavioral Pediatrics (DBP)in British Colombia University, Canada 2010, he is a developmental & Behavioral Pediatric Consultant at King Fahad Medical City and a leader of DBP Service line at Riyadh Medical Cluster 2, Saudia Arabia, He is expert in ADHD & Autism.

Barakat M. Alotaibi is the Co-Author for this manuscript. he work at the Institute of Public Administration. Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Sultan Mahmoud Alsaeed is the Co-Author for this manuscript. He work at the Saudi ADHD Society. Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Boshra A. Arnout is a Full Professor of Psychology with a distinguished career in research. She work at King Khalid University, Department of Psychology, as well as Zagazig University.

Latifah ALQasem is the Co-Author for this manuscript. She work at the Saudi Central Bank, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Abdulkarim Alhossein is a Professor of Special Education at King Saud University. He has extensive experience as a special educator and education supervisor within a school district. Dr. Alhossein earned both his master’s and doctoral degrees in Special Education from The University of Northern Colorado and Kent State University. His research interests encompass ADHD, EBPs, MTSS.

Yasser Jubran Alqahtani is a Consultant of child and Adolescent psychiatry. Clinician and researcher. Focusing in improving the quality of care toward children and their families. A member of the scintificcommittee for developmental disorders in the Saudi Health Council.

Samirah A. AlGhamdi is a Consultant of child and Adolescent psychiatry, Mental health lead at Model of Care, HHC/ MOH. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Jeremy Varnham is an ADHD advocate with over 15 years of service at the Saudi ADHD Society, where he is the Research and Programs Director. He contributes to the development of culturally relevant, evidence-based programmes and has collaborated on award-winning mental health initiatives through digital transformation. Jeremy was instrumental in the adaptation and publication of the Saudi ADHD Clinical Practice Guidelines and has played a key role in the translation and cultural adaptation of ADHD rating scales for national research projects and clinical screening in Saudi Arabia.

Saeed Abdulwahab Asiri is a Consultant Psychiatry at Mental health department, King Fahad Medical City. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Maysaa W. Buraik is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist with a concentration in neuropsychology and health psychology, holding her doctorate from the American School of Professional Psychology at Argosy University, Washington, DC. A specialist in ADHD and learning disorders, she is a passionate advocate for children and adults with ADHD. Dr. Buraik has contributed to national ADHD and autism guidelines in Saudi Arabia and is dedicated to advancing psychological care and mentoring future psychologists in the region.

References

Adler

L. A.

Faraone

S. V.

Sarocco

Atkins

Khachatryan

(2019). Establishing US norms for the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) and characterizing symptom burden among adults with self-reported ADHD. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 73(1), e13260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13260

Al-Masry

(2012). Studying attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity among male and female secondary and university students from their perspective and its relationship to some behavioral characteristics in the Qassim educational region in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University, 148: 402–443.

Al-Shahrani

(2019). Causal attribution among a sample of people with attention disorder accompanied by hyperactivity and normal university students. Journal of Studies in Psychological and Educational Counseling, 4, 1–26.

Al-Wardat

Etoom

Almhdawi

K. A.

Hawamdeh

Khader

(2024). Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents and adults in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 14, e078849. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078849

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association.

Anbarasan

Kitchin

Adler

L. A.

(2020). Screening for adult ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(12), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01194-9

Ayano

Demelash

Gizachew

Tsegay

Alati

(2023). The global prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders, 339, 860–866.

Baggio

Bayard

Cabelguen

Desseilles

Gachet

Kraemer

Richard-Lepouriel

Nicastro

Bioulac

Sauvaget

Weibel

Perroud

Lopez

(2021). Diagnostic accuracy of the French version of the adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder self-report screening scale for DSM-5 (ASRS-5). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 43: 367–375.

Bálint

Czobor

Komlósi

Mészáros

Simon

Bitter

(2009). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): gender- and age-related differences in neurocognition. Psychological Medicine, 39(8), 1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708004236

10.

Ballmann

Kölle

M. A.

Bekavac-Günther

Wolf

Pargent

Barzel

Philipsen

Gensichen

(2022). Evaluation of the German version of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 as a screening tool for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 858147.

11.

Barkley

R. A.

Murphy

K. R.

(1998). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Clinical Workbook (pp. 90–94). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

12.

Canu

Stevens

Ranson

Lefler

LaCount

Serrano

Willcutt

Hartung

(2020). College readiness: differences between first-year undergraduates with and without ADHD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(6): 403–411.

13.

Cheung

G. W.

Cooper-Thomas

H. D.

Lau

R. S.

Wang

L. C.

(2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783.

14.

Chung

Jiang

Paksarian

Nikolaid

Castellano

Merikangas

Milham

(2019). Trends in the prevalence and incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adults and children of different racial and ethnic groups. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1914344. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14344

15.

Cortese

Song

Farhat

L. C.

Yon

D. K.

Lee

S. W.

Kim

M. S.

Park

J. W.

Lee

Cheon

K. A.

Smith

Gosling

C. J.

Polanczyk

G. V.

Larsson

Rohde

L. A.

Faraone

S. V.

Koyanagi

Dragioti

Radua

… Solmi

(2023). Incidence, prevalence, and global burden of ADHD from 1990 to 2019 across 204 countries: Data, with critical re-analysis, from the Global Burden of Disease study. Molecular Psychiatry, 28(11), 4823–4830.

16.

Dobrosavljevic

Solares

Cortese

Andershed

Larsson

(2020). Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review, 118, 282–289.

17.

Faraone

S. V.

Sergeant

Gillberg

Biederman

(2003). The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry-Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association, 2(2), 104–113.

18.

Garland

M. R.

(2006). The short-form adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity self-report scale is a useful diagnostic measure. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 9(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.9.2.38

19.

Haavik

Halmøy

Lundervold

A. J.

Fasmer

O. B.

(2010). Clinical assessment and diagnosis of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Expert Rev Neurother, 10(10),1569–1580. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.10.149

20.

Hargitai

L. D.

Livingston

L. A.

Waldren

L. H.

Robinson

Jarrold

Shah

(2023). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder traits are a more important predictor of internalizing problems than autistic traits. Scientific Reports, 13, 31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26350-4

21.

Harrison

A. G.

Edwards

M. J.

(2023). The ability of self-report methods to accurately diagnose attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 27(12), 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547231177470

22.

Klassen

Katzman

Chokka

(2010). Adult ADHD and its comorbidities, with a focus on bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 124(1–2),1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.036

23.

Kessler

R. C.

Adler

Ames

Demler

Faraone

Hiripi

Howes

M. J.

Jin

Secnik

Spencer

Ustun

T. B.

Walters

E. E.

(2005). The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): A short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 245–256. doi:10.1017/s0033291704002892

24.

Kooij

J. J. S.

Bijlenga

Salerno

Jaeschke

Bitter

Balázs

Thome

Dom

Kasper

Nunes Filipe

Stes

Mohr

Leppämäki

Casas

Bobes

Mccarthy

J. M.

Richarte

Kjems Philipsen

Pehlivanidis

. . . Asherson

(2019).Updated European Consensus Statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD. European Psychiatry, 56(1), 14–34.

25.

Kwon

Kim

Kwak

(2018). Difficulties faced by university students with self-reported symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a qualitative study. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 12, 12: 1–8.

26.

Lutfi

(2022). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its relationship to self-efficacy and social skills among university students. Journal of Psychological Counseling, 70, 87–168.

27.

Niina

Eyre

Wootton

Stergiakouli

Thapar

Riglin

(2022). Exploring ADHD symptoms and associated impairment across development. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(6), 822–830.

28.

Perera

Courtenay

Solomou

Borakati

Strydom

(2020). Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in intellectual disability: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder V versus clinical impression. Journal of intellectual disability Research, 64(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12705

29.

Ramos-Quiroga

Montoya

Kutzelnigg

Deberdt

Sobanski

(2013). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the European adult population: Prevalence, disease awareness, and treatment guidelines. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 29(9), 1093–1104

30.

Rösler

Retz

Retz-Junginger

Thome

Supprian

Nissen

Stieglitz

R.D.

Blocher

Hengesch

Trott

G. E.

(2004). Tools for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: self-rating behaviour questionnaire and diagnostic checklist. Der Nervenarzt, 75, 888–895.

31.

Rösler

Retz

Thome

Schneider

Stieglitz

R. D.

Falkai

(2006). Psychopathological rating scales for diagnostic use in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [Published correction appears in Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Apr;258(3):192-3]. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 256 (Suppl. 1), i3–i11. doi:10.1007/s00406-006-1001-7.

32.

Saudi Vision 2030 (2016, April 25). Vision 2030: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Retrieved November 30, 2023, from https://vision2030.gov.sa/en

33.

Sobanski

Brüggemann

Alm

Kern

Deschner

Schubert

Philipsen

Rietschel

(2007). Psychiatric comorbidity and functional impairment in a clinically referred sample of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257(7), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-007-0712-8

34.

Somma

Adler

L. A.

Gialdi

Arteconi

Cotilli

Fossati

(2021). The validity of the world health organization adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder self-report screening scale for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition in adolescence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 31(9), 631–638.

35.

Sonnby

Skordas

Olofsdotter

Vadlin

Nilsson

K. W.

Ramklint

(2014). Validation of the world health organization adult ADHD self-report scale for adolescents. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(3), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2014.968203

36.

Song

Zha

Yang

Zhang

Rudan

&, ; The Global Health Epidemiology Reference Group (GHERG). (2021). The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health, 11, 04009. https://doi.org/10.7189%2Fjogh.11.04009

37.

Russell

A. E.

Ford

Williams

Russell

(2016). The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A systematic review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47, 440–458.

38.

Ustun

Adler

L. A.

Rudin

Faraone

S. V.

Spencer

T. J.

Berglund

Gruber

M. J.

Kessler

R. C.

(2017). The world health organization adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder self-report screening scale for DSM-5 [published correction appears in JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1279; and in JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1213]. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(5), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0298

39.

Willcutt

(2012). The prevalence of DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Neurotherapeutics, 9(3), 490–499.

40.

Yáñez-Téllez

Villaseñor-Valadez

Prieto-Corona

Seubert-Ravelo

(2021). Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Mexican university students. Archivos de Neurociencias, 26(3), 10–16.

41.

Ziobrowski

H. N.

Adler

L. A.

Zainal

N. H.

Anbarasan

Sampson

N. A.

Pauac-Polanco

Kessler

R. C.

(2023). Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale (ASRS). In: Krägeloh

C. U.

Alyami

Medvedev

O. N.

(Eds.), International handbook of behavioral health assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89738-3_50-1

42.

Zwirs

B. W.

Burger

Schulpen

T. W.

Wiznitzer

Fedder

Buitelaar

J. K.

(2007). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among children of different ethnic origin. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 556–566.

Standardization of the Arabic Version of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 (ASRS-5) Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: Variability of ADHD Screening According to Sociodemographic Variables

Abstract

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

Participants and Procedures

Measure

Statistical Analysis

Results

Participant Sociodemographic Characteristics

Internal Consistency of the ASRS-5-AR

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Normative Data of the ASRS-5-AR

Differences in ADHD Screening According to Sociodemographic Characteristics

Discussion

Conclusion

Study Strengths and Limitations

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics

ORCID iDs

Availability of Data and Materials

Author Biographies

References