To examine the associations between the number and type of memory complaints with memory and sustained attention performance in healthy middle-aged adults.
Method:
Sixty-six healthy individuals aged 35–64 years (Mage = 47.73 years) were administered the seven Questions, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Sustained Attention to Response Task, and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21.
Results:
The number of memory complaints was not associated with memory or sustained attention performance but was associated with anxiety symptoms. The type of memory complaint was likewise not associated with memory or sustained attention performance. The complaints “recent change in ability to remember things” and “trouble remembering things from one second to the next” were associated with anxiety symptoms.
Conclusion:
Complaints about memory in otherwise healthy middle-aged adults do not reliably indicate memory or sustained attention performance. Rather, these complaints are more likely to be associated with heightened, but nevertheless subclinical, anxiety.
AbdulrabK.HeunR. (2008). Subjective memory impairment. A review of its definitions indicates the need for a comprehensive set of standardised and validated criteria. European Psychiatry, 23(5), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.02.004
2.
AmariglioR. E.TownsendM. K.GrodsteinF.SperlingR. A.RentzD. M. (2011). Specific subjective memory complaints in older persons may indicate poor cognitive function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(9), 1612–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03543.x
3.
BassettS. S.FolsteinM. F. (1993). Memory complaint, memory performance, and psychiatric diagnosis: A community study. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 6(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198879300600207
4.
BegumA.DeweyM.HassiotisA.PrinceM.WesselyS.StewartR. (2014). Subjective cognitive complaints across the adult life span: A 14-year analysis of trends and associations using the 1993, 2000 and 2007 English Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys. Psychological Medicine, 44(9), 1977–1987. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002444
BurmesterB.LeathemJ.MerrickP. (2015). Assessing subjective memory complaints: A comparison of spontaneous reports and structured questionnaire methods. International Psychogeriatrics, 27(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214001161
7.
BurmesterB.LeathemJ.MerrickP. (2016). Subjective cognitive complaints and objective cognitive function in aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent cross-sectional findings. Neuropsychology Review, 26(4), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-016-9332-2
8.
CheyneJ. A.CarriereJ. S. A.SmilekD. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.009
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
CooperC.BebbingtonP.LindesayJ.MeltzerH.McManusS.JenkinsR.LivingstonG. (2011). The meaning of reporting forgetfulness: A cross-sectional study of adults in the English 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Age and Ageing, 40(6), 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afr121
11.
CrumleyJ. J.StetlerC. A.HorhotaM. (2014). Examining the relationship between subjective and objective memory performance in older adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 29(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035908
12.
DerouesnéC.AlperovitchA.ArvayN.MigeonP. (1989). Memory complaints in the elderly: A study of 367 community-dwelling individuals from 50 to 80 years old. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Supplement, 1, 151–163.
FassbenderC.MurphyK.FoxeJ. J.WylieG. R.JavittD. C.RobertsonI. H.GaravanH. (2004). A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.007
16.
GoR. C. P.DukeL. W.HarrellL. E.CodyH.BassettS. S.FolsteinM. F.AlbertM. S.FosterJ. L.SharrowN. A.BlackerD. (1997). Development and validation of a structured telephone interview for dementia assessment (STIDA): The NIMH Genetics Initiative. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Neurology, 10(4), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198879701000407
17.
HänninenT.ReinikainenK. J.HelkalaE. L.KoivistoK.MykkänenL.LaaksoM.PyöräläK.RiekkinenP. J. (1994). Subjective memory complaints and personality traits in normal elderly subjects. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06064.x
18.
JohnsonK. A.LewisF. C.CornishK. M. (2019). A child-focused version of the Attention Network Task designed to investigate interactions between the attention networks, including the endogenous orienting network. Child Neuropsychology, 26(5), 666–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2019.1702635
JonkerC.LaunerL. J.HooijerC.LindeboomJ. (1996). Memory complaints and memory impairment in older individuals. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb05636.x
LovibondS. H.LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
23.
ManlyT.DavisonB.HeutinkJ.GallowayM.RobertsonI. H. (2000). Not enough time or not enough attention? Speed, error and self-maintained control in the Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART). Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment, 3, 167–177.
24.
ManlyT.OwenA. M.McAvinueL.DattaA.LewisG. H.ScottS. K.RordenC.PickardJ.RobertsonI. H. (2003). Enhancing the sensitivity of a sustained attention task to frontal damage: Convergent clinical and functional imaging evidence. Neurocase, 9(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1076/neur.9.4.340.15553
25.
ManlyT.RobertsonI. H.GallowayM.HawkinsK. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00127-4
26.
MäntyläT. (2003). Assessing absentmindedness: Prospective memory complaint and impairment in middle-aged adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196078
27.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(7), S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775
28.
MendesT.GinóS.RibeiroF.GuerreiroM.SousaG. D.RitchieK.de MendonçaA. (2008). Memory complaints in healthy young and elderly adults: Reliability of memory reporting. Aging and Mental Health, 12(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860701797281
29.
MinettT. S. C.Da SilvaR. V.OrtizK. Z.BertolucciP. H. F. (2008). Subjective memory complaints in an elderly sample: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1836
30.
MolM. E. M.RuiterR. A. C.VerheyF. R. J.DijkstraJ.JollesJ. (2008). A study into the psychosocial determinants of perceived forgetfulness: Implications for future interventions. Aging and Mental Health, 12(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860801972503
31.
O’ConnellR. G.DockreeP. M.BellgroveM. A.TurinA.WardS.FoxeJ. J.RobertsonI. H. (2009). Two types of action error: Electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21008
32.
PodewilsL. J.McLayR. N.RebokG. W.LyketsosC. G. (2003). Relationship of self-perceptions of memory and worry to objective measures of memory and cognition in the general population. Psychosomatics, 44(6), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.44.6.461
33.
PondsR. W. H. M.CommissarisC. J. A. M.JollesJ. (1997). Prevalence and covariates of subjective forgetfulness in a normal population in The Netherlands. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.2190/MVQ1-WB58-875H-Y4X0
34.
ReyA. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie [The clinical examination in psychology]. Presses Universitaries De France.
35.
RobertsonI. H.ManlyT.AndradeJ.BaddeleyB. T.YiendJ. (1997). ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8
36.
RosenthalJ. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v21n04_02
37.
SmilekD.CarriereJ. S. A.CheyneJ. A. (2010). Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: Ecological validity of the SART. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2564–2570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.002
38.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
39.
TipperS. P.BaylisG. C. (1987). Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(5), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(87)90064-X
40.
VestergrenP.NilssonL. G. (2011). Perceived causes of everyday memory problems in a population-based sample aged 39–99. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1734
41.
ZelinskiE. M.BurnightK. P.LaneC. J. (2001). The relationship between subjective and objective memory in the oldest old: Comparisons of findings from a representative and a convenience sample. Journal of Aging and Health, 13(2), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/089826430101300205
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
