Abstract
Objective:
Recently, research indicated that extended examination duration was perceived as effective by students with ADHD. However, the objective effectiveness of this accommodation has not been researched extensively. This study addresses this gap in literature.
Method:
A total of 30 students with ADHD and 30 matched typically developing controls (TDC) participated in a simulation of a real-life examination. They filled in three parallel versions of a paper-and-pencil test in three time conditions: 1 hr (+0%), 1 hr 20 min (+33%), and 1 hr 30 min (+50%).
Results:
When granted extended examination duration, students with ADHD and TDC use extra time but their performance does not increase. In addition, test-taking strategies were altered to a limited extent, and strategies that are perceived as effective (e.g., marking key words) were rarely used by the students.
Conclusion:
It is concluded that extended examination duration is not objectively effective in an experimental design. Limitations and guidelines for future research are formulated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
