This multisited ethnographic study considers how Girls of Color (GOC) develop critical literacies across informal and formal learning spaces, identifying and resisting systems of oppression and bias through participation in media fandoms. We explore how focal GOC media fandom participants made critical connections across informal and formal media fandom learning spaces. Through collaborative identification of biased practices, critical discussion around new ways of interaction, and embodied resistance and liberatory interactions at a local fandom convention, this research details how GOC used digitally mediated and embodied critical media literacies to transform public fandom life through connected trajectories of critical participation.
AljanahiM. H.AlsheikhN. (2021). There is no such thing as copying in cosplay”: Cosplay as a remixed literacy practice. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 65(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1193
2.
ApplebeeA. N. (2013). Common Core State Standards: The promise and the peril in a national palimpsest. The English Journal, 103(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201324241
3.
BaumlM.QuinnB. P.BlevinsB.MagillK. R.LeCompteK. (2023). I really want to do something”: How civic education activities promote thinking toward civic purpose among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 38(1), 110–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211006785
4.
BeachK. (1999). Chapter 4: Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001101
BishopR. S. (1990). Windows and mirrors: Children’s books and parallel cultures [Paper Presentation]. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Reading Conference, 3–12. http://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED337744
BotelhoM. J. (2021). Reframing mirrors, windows, and doors: A critical analysis of the metaphors for multicultural children’s literature. Journal of Children’s Literature, 47(1), 119–126.
9.
boydd. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
10.
BusseK. (2017). Geek hierarchies, boundary policing, and the gendering of the good fan. In Framing fan fiction: Literary and social practices in fan fiction communities (pp. 177–196). University of Iowa Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/55237
11.
CampanoG.GhisoM. P.SánchezL. (2013). Nobody knows the…amount of a person”: Elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201324161
12.
CavicchiD. (2017). Loving music: Listeners, entertainments, and the origins of music fandom in nineteenth-century America. In GrayJ.SandvossC.HarringtonC. L. (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world ((2nd ed, pp. 109–126). New York University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.18574/9781479845453-007/html
13.
ColemanJ. J.GriffinA. A.ThomasE. E. (2023). Restorying young adult literature: Expanding students’ perspectives with digital texts. National Council of Teachers of English.
14.
CorbittA.JonesK.StormS.Carter-StoneL. (2024). Expanding reader-response: Tracing emergence, nested ontology, and affect across playful activities. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 20, 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2024.2424329
15.
CortezA.McKoyA.LizárragaJ. R. (2022). The future of young blacktivism: Aesthetics and practices of speculative activism in video game play. Journal of Futures Studies, 26(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.202203_26(3).0005
GrayK. L. (2020). Intersectional tech: Black users in digital gaming. LSU Press.
21.
GutiérrezK. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
HaborakF. K. (2020). Identity, curated branding, and the star cosplayer’s pursuit of Instagram fame. Transformative Works and Cultures, 34, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2020.1949
24.
HadleyH. L.ToliverS. R. (2023). The monstrous hospitality of canonical text selections: The need for a hospitable literacy framework. Journal of Literacy Research, 55(4), 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X231215325
25.
Hennessy ElliottC.AlcantaraK.BritoY.DuaP. (2023). Sociopolitical solidarity in STEM education: Youth-centered relationships that resist learning as just achievement data. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10161-8
26.
ItoM.GutiérrezK.LivingstoneS.PenuelB.RhodesJ.SalenK.SchorJ.Sefton-GreenJ.WatkinsS. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
JacksonA. (2021). Design principles as cultural artifacts: Pedagogical improvisation and the bridging of critical theory and teaching practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 28(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2021.1882500
29.
JamisonA. (2013). Fic: Why fanfiction is taking over the world. Smart Pop.
30.
JanksH. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.
31.
JenkinsH. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Routledge.
JenkinsH.ShresthovaS.Gamber-ThompsonL.Kligler-VilenchikN.ZimmermanA. (2016). By any media necessary: The new youth activism (Reprint ed.). NYU Press.
34.
JensenK. M. (2020). Racebending’s fight for equal representation: Using fandom and Asian American identity to shift the online discourse of the last airbender. Mise-En-Scene, 5(2), 14–21.
35.
JonesK.CisseM.SantiagoA.MaysK. (2025). Enacting speculative futures with youth at fan conventions. In Timmons-LongL.MirraN.GarciaA. (Eds.), Civic literacy, volume 2: Building civic futures in out-of-school literacy learning environments. NCTE. https://publicationsncte.org/content/books/9780814102374
36.
JonesK.StormS. (2022). Sustaining textual passions: Teaching with texts youth love. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221141393
37.
JonesK.StormS. (2023a). Designing for joy: Constructing equity trails in fandom-centered classrooms. Equity and Excellence in Education, 57(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2023.2237058
38.
JonesK.StormS. (2023b). Mimetic masculinities: Young men of color analyze anime texts they love. In PantherL.CrovitzD. (Eds.), Critical memetic literacies in English education: How do you meme? (pp. 62–73). Routledge.
39.
JonesK.StormS. (2024). Fandoms in the classroom: A social justice approach to transforming literacy learning. Myers Education Press.
40.
KellyL. L. (2023). Teaching with hip hop in the 7–12 grade classroom. Routledge.
41.
KistW.DavisS.HaynesG.-V.MorrellE. (2022). Curating a literacy life: Student-centered learning with digital media. Teachers College Press.
LamerichsN. (2015). The remediation of the fan convention: Understanding the emerging genre of cosplay music videos. Transformative Works, 18, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2015.0606
44.
LammersJ.MagnificoA.WangA. (2022). Playful multiliteracies: Fan-based literacies’ role in English language arts pedagogy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 66(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1253
45.
LammersJ.Van AlstyneJ. H. (2018). Building bridges from classrooms to networked publics: Helping students write for the audience they want. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 62(6), 593–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.933
46.
LeanderK. M.BurrissS. K. (2020). Critical literacy for a posthuman world: When people read, and become, with machines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1262–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12924
47.
LengR. H. Y. (2014). Gender, sexuality, and cosplay: A case study of male-to-female crossplay. The Phoenix Papers: First Edition, 1(1), 89–110.
48.
LiteratI.Kligler-VilenchikN. (2018). Youth online political expression in non-political spaces: Implications for civic education. Journal of Educational Media : The Journal of the Educational Television Association, 43(4), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1504789
49.
LowD. E.RappS. M. (2021). Youth identities and affinities on the move: Using a transliteracies framework to critique digital dichotomies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 16(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1914053
50.
LowD. E.TorresF. L. (2022). Comics as literary compasses and kaleidoscopes: A pedagogical essay in dragments. Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2022.5.2.138-174
MagnificoA. M.LammersJ. C.FieldsD. A. (2018). Affinity spaces, literacies and classrooms: Tensions and opportunities. Literacy, 52(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12133
53.
McDanielD. S. (2024). Toward culturally digitized pedagogy: Informing theory, research, and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.534
54.
McInroyL. B.BeerO. W. (2022). Wands up! Internet-mediated social advocacy organizations and youth-oriented connective action. New Media and Society, 24(3), 724–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820964809
millerj. (2020). Raceplay: Whiteness and erasure in cross-racial cosplay. In PandeR. (Ed.), Fandom, now in color (pp. 65–78). University of Iowa Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv193rr0q.10
57.
MirraN.GarciaA. (2020). I hesitate but I do have hope”: Youth speculative civic literacies for troubled times. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.2.295
58.
MirraN.GarciaA.MorrellE. (2016). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. Routledge.
59.
MishouA. L. (2022). Cosplayers: Gender and identity. Routledge.
60.
MuhammadG. E. (2020). Cultivating genius: An equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic Professional.
61.
NicholsT. P.LeBlancR. J. (2021). Media education and the limits of “literacy”: Ecological orientations to performative platforms. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(4), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2020.1865104
62.
OhitoE. O. (2022). I’m very hurt”: (un)justly Reading the black female body as text in a racial literacy learning assemblage. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.430
63.
PandeR.(Ed.). (2020). Fandom, now in color: A collection of voices. University of Iowa Press.
64.
PhilipT. M.GarciaA. D. (2013). The importance of still teaching the iGeneration: New technologies and the centrality of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.2.w221368g1554u158
65.
PhilipT. M.GuptaA. (2020). Emerging perspectives on the co-construction of power and learning in the learning sciences, mathematics education, and science education. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903309
66.
PlayerG. D.AnimashaunO.ThorntonT. (2023). Getting lost in stars and glitter”: Black girls’ multimodal literacies as portals to new suns. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2025490
67.
SkerrettA.BomerR. (2011). Borderzones in adolescents’ literacy practices: Connecting out-of-school literacies to the reading curriculum. Urban Education, 46(6), 1256–1279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911398920
68.
SoepE. (2014). Participatory politics: Next-generation tactics to remake public spheres. MIT Press.
69.
StanfillM. (2018). The unbearable whiteness of fandom and fan studies. In BoothP. (Ed.), A companion to media fandom and fan studies (pp. 305–317). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119237211.ch19
70.
StormS. (2024). Aesthetic literacies in digital learning ecologies: Tracing aesthetic tools and functions in a youth literary salon. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 73(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377241285818
71.
StormS.JonesK.BeckS. W. (2022). Designing interpretive communities toward justice: Indexicality in classroom discourse. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 21(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0073
72.
StornaiuoloA.SmithA.PhillipsN. C. (2017). Developing a transliteracies framework for a connected world. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16683419
73.
TanksleyT. C. (2024). We’re changing the system with this one”: Black students using critical race algorithmic literacies to subvert and survive AI-mediated racism in school. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 23(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2023-0102
74.
ThomasE. E. (2019). The dark fantastic: Race and the imagination from Harry Potter to the Hunger Games. NYU Press.
ThomasE. E.StornaiuoloA. (2019). Race, storying, and restorying: What can we learn from Black fans?Transformative Works and Cultures, 29, https://dx.https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2019.1562
77.
TompkinsJ. E. (2019). Is gender just a costume? An exploratory study of crossplay. Transformative Works and Cultures, 30, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2019.1459
78.
VossoughiS.GutiérrezK. D. (2014). Studying movement, hybridity, and change: Toward a multi-sited sensibility for research on learning across contexts and borders. Teachers College Record, 116(14), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601413
79.
WalkerT. D. (2019). Narrative extraction, #BlackPantherSoLit, and signifyin’: “Black Panther” fandom and transformative social practices. Transformative Works and Cultures, 29, https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2019.1643
