This study examines differences in teachers’ uptake of critical language pedagogy during a 16-week graduate course. Drawing on narrative constructs of personal, professional, and linguistic identity, the study shows that the more tightly teachers integrate hegemonic language ideologies into their various identities, the more hesitant they are to take up critical approaches to language teaching. We use illustrative cases to describe a typology of engaged adopters, hesitant converts, and resistant skeptics. Based on our findings we recommend introducing critical language teaching early in educator preparation programs and during K-12 schooling so that teachers’ early identity formation includes critical approaches to language teaching. For teacher educators and professional developers working with veteran teachers, we recommend thinking beyond conveying linguistic information and attending to the identity work required of teachers making significant shifts to their personal, professional, and linguistic identities.
AkkermanS. F.MeijerP. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
2.
AlimH. S. (2010). Critical language awareness. In HornbergerN. H.McKayS. L. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 205–231). Multilingual Matters.
3.
AlimH. S. (2023). Inventing “the white voice”: Racial capitalism, raciolinguistics & culturally sustaining pedagogies. Daedalus, 152(3), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_02023
4.
AlsupJ. (2018). Teacher identity discourse as identity growth: Stories of authority and vulnerability. In SchutzP. A.HongJ.FrancisD. C. (Eds.), Research on teacher identity: Mapping challenges and innovations (pp. 13–23). Springer International Publishing.
5.
AndersonK. T.AmbrosoE.CruzJ.ZuikerS. J.Rodríguez-MartínezS. (2021). Complicating methods for understanding educators’ language ideologies: Transformative approaches for mixing methods. Language and Education, 36(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1931296
6.
AndersonK. T.Rodríguez-MartínezS.YoonS. S. (2024). Educators’ stancetaking on standardized English: From prescriptivist to critically conscious and somewhere in-between. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2299696
7.
AthanasesS. Z.BanesL. C.WongJ. W.MartinezD. C. (2018). Exploring linguistic diversity from the inside out: Implications of self-reflexive inquiry for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118778838
8.
AyiewbeyS.SarkhoshM. (2023). Narrative formation of teacher identity from the perspective of complexity theory. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11(46), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.30495/JFL.2023.703378
9.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Dismantling anti-Black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist Black language pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415
10.
BambergM.GeorgakopoulouA. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse and Communication Studies, 28(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
11.
BanesL. C.MartínezD. C.AthanasesS. Z.WongJ. W. (2016). Self-reflexive inquiry into language use and beliefs: Toward more expansive language ideologies. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1185906
12.
BeauchampC.ThomasL. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
13.
BeijaardD.VerloopN.VermuntJ. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
14.
BucholtzM.HallK. (2004). Language and identity. In A companion to linguistic anthropology (Vol. 1, pp. 369–394). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
15.
BukorE. (2015). Exploring teacher identity from a holistic perspective: Reconstructing and reconnecting personal and professional selves. Teachers and Teaching, 21(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.953818
16.
ChenG. A.HornI. S.NolenS. B. (2018). Engaging teacher identities in teacher education: Shifting notions of the “good teacher” to broaden teachers’ learning. In SchutzP. A.HongJ.Cross FrancisD. (Eds.), Research on teacher identity: Mapping challenges and innovations (pp. 85–95). Springer International Publishing.
CruzJ.AndersonK. T. (2024). Reconceptualizing online discussion forums as a fabricated focus group: Illuminating educators’ language ideologies through asynchronous discussion posts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1991031
22.
CurwoodJ. S. (2014). Between continuity and change: Identities and narratives within teacher professional development. Teaching Education, 25(2), 156–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2012.755159
23.
de los RíosC. V.PatelL. (2023). Positions, positionality, and relationality in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2268036
24.
DevereauxM. D.PalmerC. C. (Eds.). (2019). Teaching language variation in the classroom: Strategies and models from teachers and linguists. Routledge.
25.
ElbowP. (2012). Vernacular eloquence: What speech can bring to writing. Oxford University Press.
26.
EricksonF. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
FaircloughN. (1992). Critical language awareness. Routledge.
28.
GalS.IrvineJ. T. (2019). Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge University Press.
29.
GarcíaO.JohnsonS.SeltzerK. (2016). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Brookes Publishing.
30.
GarcíaO.WeiL. (2013). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Pivot.
31.
GodleyA. J.MinniciA. (2008). Critical language pedagogy in an urban high school English class. Urban Education, 43(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907311801
32.
GodleyA. J.ReaserJ. (2018). Critical language pedagogy: Interrogating language, dialects, and power in teacher education (New ed.). Peter Lang, International Academic Publishers.
33.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (HoareQ.SmithG. N., Eds.). International Publishers Co.
KinlochV. (2010). “To not be a traitor of Black English”: Youth perceptions of language rights in an urban context. The Teachers College Record, 112(1), 103–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200101
36.
KinlochV. (2011). Urban literacies: Critical perspectives on language, learning, and community. Teachers College Press.
37.
KorthagenF.VasalosA. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
38.
KroskrityP. V. (2016). Language ideologies: Emergence, elaboration, and application. In BonvillainN. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 95–108). Routledge.
39.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.
40.
LojdováK.VlčkováK.NehybaJ. (2021). Stories of teachers’ identity: Between personal and professional experience. Studia Paedagogica, 26(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2021-2-6
41.
MallinsonC.Charity HudleyA. H. (2013). We do language: English language variation in the secondary English classroom. Teachers College Press.
42.
MartínezR. A. (2013). Reading the world in Spanglish: Hybrid language practices and ideological contestation in a sixth-grade English language arts classroom. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.03.007
McMurtryT. (2023). Hook’d on Ebonics and Black texts: Enacting an engaged pedagogy in an 11th grade ELA classroom. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 38(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2384
45.
MetzM. (2018). Exploring the complexity of high school students’ beliefs about language variation. Linguistics and Education, 45, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.02.003
46.
MetzM. (2019). Accommodating linguistic prejudice? Examining English teachers’ language ideologies. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 18(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-09-2018-0081
47.
MetzM. (2021). Ideology, identity, and pedagogy in English language arts teachers’ linguistic styling in U.S. classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100942
48.
MetzM. (2022). Re-narrating grammar instruction: Addressing teachers’ narrative understanding of language use. Language and Education, 37(4), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2151367
49.
MetzM. (2023). Critical language awareness. In GorlewskiD.GorlewskiJ.BarkerL. M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of English language arts education: A critical perspective (Vol. 6, pp. 60–66). Brill.
50.
MetzM.GordonM.NguyenT. (2024). A wide-angle view of prekindergarten through 12th-grade teachers’ beliefs about language correction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 63(1). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol63/iss1/3
51.
MetzM.KnightH. (2021). The dominant school language narrative: Unpacking English teachers’ language ideologies. Language: Teaching Linguistics, 97(3), e238–e256. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0041
52.
MilroyJ. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163
53.
Mosley WetzelM.RogersR. (2015). Constructing racial literacy through critical language awareness: A case study of a beginning literacy teacher. Linguistics and Education, 32(Part A), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.014
54.
OchsE.CappsL. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Harvard University Press.
55.
OrzulakM. J. M. (2015). Disinviting deficit ideologies: Beyond “that’s standard,” “that’s racist,” and “that’s your mother tongue”. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201527601
RazfarA.RumenappJ. C. (2013). Applying linguistics in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
58.
SchusterE. H. (2005). Sentence comparison: An activity for teaching style. English Journal, 94(5), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej20054268
59.
SeltzerK. (2022). Enacting a critical translingual approach in teacher preparation: Disrupting oppressive language ideologies and fostering the personal, political, and pedagogical stances of preservice teachers of English. TESOL Journal, 13(2), e649. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.649
60.
SeltzerK.de los RíosC. V. (2018). Translating theory to practice: Exploring teachers’ raciolinguistic literacies in secondary English classrooms. English Education, 51(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201829833
61.
ShapiroS. (2022). Cultivating critical language awareness in the writing classroom. Routledge.
62.
SmithermanG. (2017). Raciolinguistics, “mis-education,” and language arts teaching in the 21st century. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 32(2), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2164
63.
TaieS.LewisL. (2022). Characteristics of 2020-21 public and private K-12 school teachers in the United States: Results from the National Teacher and Principal Survey (p. 9) [Summary Report]. National Center for Education Statistics.
64.
TaylorK. M.TaylorE. M.HartmanP.WoodardR.VaughanA.CoppolaR.RochaD. J.MachadoE. (2019). Expanding repertoires of resistance: Teachers cultivating critical English language arts pedagogies through collaborative narrative inquiry. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 18(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2018-0114
65.
TaylorL. A.VlachS. K.Mosley WetzelM. (2018). Observing, resisting, and problem-posing language and power: Possibilities for small stories in inservice teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 46, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.006
WongJ. W.AthanasesS. Z.BanesL. C. (2020). Developing as an agentive bilingual teacher: Self-reflexive and student-learning inquiry as teacher education resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1345850
69.
WoodardR.RaoA. (2020). Tensions and possibilities in fostering critical language ideologies in elementary teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 16(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1742106
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
