Literacy scholarship captures immigrant youth of color ethnoracial identity constructions through their digital literacy practices. Still, few studies examine how immigrant youth of African origin use digital literacy to navigate ethnoracial tensions and craft racialized identities. Drawing on raciolinguistic and postcolonial theory, this study extends and nuances existing scholarship by examining the digital literacy practices and ethnoracial identity formations of a 13-year-old Nigerian girl who migrated to the United States. Positioning my analysis within the intersection of race, language, and identity, I inquire: How does Isioma leverage digital literacies to navigate U.S. racialization and negotiate U.S. racial identity categories? Furthermore, how does Isioma employ digital literacies to construct and negotiate her ethnoracial identities? I employ a narrative analysis of home observations, semistructured interviews, and literacy artifacts. Findings illustrate how digital tools disrupt raciolinguistic perspectives against minoritized languages. Digital literacies also enable the preservation of ethnic identities and languages while influencing racialized and hybrid identity formation and narration in the physical world.
AgboO. F.PlagI. (2020). The relationship of Nigerian English and Nigerian Pidgin in Nigeria: Evidence from copula constructions in ICE-Nigeria. Journal of Language Contact, 13(2), 351–388. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-bja10023
2.
AgyepongM. (2013). Seeking to be heard: An African-born, American-raised child’s tale of struggle, invisibility, and invincibility. In HarushimanaI.Mthethwa-SommersS. (Eds.), Reprocessing race, language, and ability: African-born educators and students in transnational America (pp. 155–168). Peter Lang Publishers.
AverillJ. B. (2002). Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200611
6.
AwokoyaJ. T. (2012). Identity constructions and negotiations among 1.5- and second-generation Nigerians: The impact of family, school, and peer contexts. Harvard Educational Review, 82(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.2.9v77p329367116vj
7.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
8.
BallA. F. (1992). Cultural preference and the expository writing of African-American adolescents. Written Communication, 9(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088392009004003
9.
BauerE. B.SánchezL. (2020). Living nan lonbraj la: Haitian immigrant young people writing their selves into the world. Teachers College Record, 122(13), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201305
BradenE. G. (2020). Navigating Black racial identities: Literacy insights from an immigrant family. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201310
15.
BrodkinK. (1998). How Jews became white folks and what that says about race in America. Rutgers University Press.
CampanoG.GhisoM. P.WelchB. J. (2016). Partnering with immigrant communities: Action through literacy. Teachers College Press.
18.
CesaireA. (1972). Discourse on colonialism. Monthly Review Press.
19.
ClemonsA. M. (2021). New blacks: Language, DNA, and the construction of the African American/Dominican boundary of difference. Genealogy, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5010001
Compton-LillyC.PapoiK.VenegasP.HammanL.SchwabenbauerB. (2017). Intersectional identity negotiation: The case of young immigrant children. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16683421
22.
ConnellyF. M.ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176100
23.
CopeB.KalantzisM. (2013). ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. In HawkinsM. R. (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 105–135). Routledge.
24.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
25.
DávilaL. T. (2015). Diaspora literacies: An exploration of what Reading means to young African immigrant women. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.414
26.
DávilaL. T. (2019). “J’aime to be funny!”: Humor, learning, and identity construction in high school English as a second language classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12557
27.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2023). Critical race theory: An introduction (Vol. 20). NYU Press.
28.
DoucetF. (2014). Panoply: Haitian and Haitian-American youth crafting identities in U.S. Schools. Trotter Review, 22(1), 3.
EdosomwanS.PetersonC. M. (2016). A history of oral and written storytelling in Nigeria. Commission for International Adult Education.
31.
EllisonT. L. (2014). Digital ontologies of self: Two African American adolescents co-construct and negotiate identities through The Sims 2. Digital Culture & Education, 6(4).
32.
ElugbeB. (2008). Nigerian Pidgin English: Phonology. In MesthrieR. (Ed.), Varieties of English: 4 Africa, south and Southeast Asia (pp. 55–64). Dokumen Pub.
33.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
FanonF. (1967). Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press.
36.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
37.
FriesonB. L. (2022). “It’s like they don’t see us at all”: A critical race theory critique of dual language bilingual education for black children. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190522000022
38.
GarciaP.FernándezC.OkonkwoH. (2020). Leveraging technology: How Black girls enact critical digital literacies for social change. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1773851
39.
GeeJ. P. (1991). What is literacy? In MitchellC.WeilerK. (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 5–11). Bergin & Garvey.
40.
GeeJ. P.HayesE. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Routledge.
41.
GeertzC. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford University Press.
42.
GreeneD.GriffinA.PerryT.Price-DennisD. (2021). Kitchen table talks: Digital literacies and black girlhood. In Black girls’ literacies (pp. 239–244). Routledge.
43.
HallS.GayP. d. (1996). Questions of cultural identity. Sage.
44.
HartmanS. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press on Demand.
45.
HullG. A.NelsonM. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224261.
IbrahimA. E. K. M. (1999). Becoming Black: Rap and hip-hop, race, gender, identity, and the politics of ESL learning. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587669
48.
JandrićP.KnoxJ.BesleyT.RybergT.SuorantaJ.HayesS. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
KimG. M. (2016a). Practicing multilingual identities: Online interactions in a Korean dramas forum. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(4), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1192849
51.
KimG. M. (2016b). Transcultural digital literacies: Cross-border connections and self-representations in an online forum. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.131
52.
KimS. (2018). “It was kind of a given that we were all multilingual”: Transnational youth identity work in digital translanguaging. Linguistics & Education, 43, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.008
53.
Kinkead-ClarkZ. (2014). Family, culture, literacy and the kindergarten classroom: Perspectives of an immigrant teacher. International Journal of Early Childhood Learning, 21(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7939/CGP/v21i01/48432
54.
KirambaL.OlooJ. (2020). Identity negotiation in multilingual contexts: A narrative inquiry into experiences of an African immigrant high school student. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(13), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201308
55.
KirambaL. K.TraoreH. M.TraininG. (2022). At school, it’s a completely different world”: African immigrant youth agency and negotiation of their adaptation processes in U.S. urban schools. Urban Education, 1–30. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221140407
56.
KwonJ. (2022). Understanding the transnational lives and literacies of immigrant children. Teachers College Press.
57.
LamW. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587739
58.
LamW. S. E. (2013). Multilingual practices in transnational digital contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 820–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.132
59.
LamW. S. E.ChristiansenM. S. (2022). Transnational Mexican youth negotiating languages, identities, and cultures online: A chronotopic lens. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3145
60.
LamW. S. E.Rosario-RamosE. (2009). Multilingual literacies in transnational digitally mediated contexts: An exploratory study of immigrant teens in the United States. Language and Education, 23(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152929
61.
LamW. S. E.WarrinerD. S. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.016
62.
Lewis EllisonT. (2023). Normalizing black students/youth and their families’ digital and STEAM literacies. The Reading Teacher, 76(5), 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2182
63.
LiuY.LiZ.BreitungW. (2012). The social networks of new-generation migrants in China’s urbanized villages: A case study of Guangzhou. Habitat International, 36(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.008
64.
MahiriJ. (2017). Deconstructing race: Multicultural education beyond the color-bind. Teachers College Press.
65.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
66.
McLeanC. A. (2010). A space called home: An immigrant adolescent’s digital literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.1.2
67.
McLeanC. A. (2020). Racialized tensions in the multimodal literacies of Black immigrant youth. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(13), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201303
68.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
69.
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415–437.
70.
Nalubega-BookerK.WillisA. (2020). Applying critical race theory as a tool for examining the literacies of Black immigrant youth. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(13), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201309
Price-DennisD.CarrionS. (2017). Language arts lessons: Leveraging digital literacies for equity and social justice. Language Arts, 94(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201728912
ReedH. E.AndrzejewskiC. S. (2010). The New Wave of African Immigrants in the United States. Paper presented at Population Association of America 2010 Annual Meeting, Dallas, TX, April 15–17.
77.
RichmondH. (2002). Learners’ lives: A narrative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 7(3), 1–14.
78.
RiessmanC. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences(pp. x, 251). Sage.
79.
RosaJ.FloresN. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562
SkerrettA. (2012). Languages and literacies in translocation: Experiences and perspectives of a transnational youth. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(4), 364–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12459511
82.
SkerrettA. (2015). Teaching transnational youth: Literacy and education in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
83.
SkerrettA.OmogunL. (2020). When racial, transnational, and immigrant identities, literacies, and languages meet: Black youth of Caribbean origin speak. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(13), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012201302
84.
SmallsK. A. (2020). Race, signs, and the body: Towards a theory of racial semiotics. In AlimH. S.ReyesA.KroskrityP. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and race (1st ed., pp. 232–260). Oxford University Press.
85.
SmithP. (2019). (Re)Positioning in the Englishes and (English) literacies of a Black immigrant youth: Towards a transraciolinguistic approach. Theory Into Practice, 58(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1599227
86.
SmithP. (2022). Black immigrants in the United States: Transraciolinguistic justice for imagined futures in a global metaverse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 42, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190522000046
87.
SmithermanG. (1986). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Wayne State University Press.
88.
SteeleC. K. (2021). Digital Black feminism. NYU Press.
89.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage.
UrrietaL.Jr (2015). Learning by observing and pitching in and the connections to native and indigenous knowledge systems. Advances In Child Development and Behavior, 49, 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.08.003
WatsonV. W. M.Knight-ManuelM. G. (2017). Challenging popularized narratives of immigrant youth from West Africa: Examining social processes of navigating identities and engaging civically. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16689047
96.
WillisA. I. (2015). Literacy and race: Access, equity, and freedom. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336915617617
97.
YiY.HirvelaA. (2010). Technology and “self-sponsored” writing: A case study of a Korean-American adolescent. Computers & Composition, 27(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.005
98.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
99.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220600769331
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
