This study examined the interrelationships among and combined effects of word reading skills and syntactic knowledge on reading prosody in fifth-grade monolingual Spanish-speaking students. We used Spanish standardized tests to assess the participants (n = 169, 79 girls) on word and pseudoword reading skills, syntactic knowledge, and reading prosody. The results revealed significant relationships among these factors and reading prosody. Word reading emerged as a pivotal predictor, whereas syntactic knowledge, although playing a smaller role compared to word reading, was linked to improvements in expression, phrasing, and the reduction of ungrammatical pauses. We also found a non-significant interaction between the independent effects of word reading and syntactic knowledge on reading prosody. The study suggests the potential benefits of integrating explicit syntactic instruction into reading curricula and intervention programs to support the development of reading prosody in Spanish.
Álvarez-CañizoM.CuevaE.CuetosF.Suárez-CoallaP. (2020a). Reading fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish secondary students. Psicothema, 32(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.196
2.
Álvarez-CañizoM.Martínez-GarcíaC.CuetosF.Suárez-CoallaP. (2020b). Development of reading prosody in school-age Spanish children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12286
3.
Álvarez-CañizoM.Suárez-CoallaP.CuetosF. (2018). Reading prosody development in Spanish children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9768-7
4.
AugurzkyP. (2006). Attaching relative clauses in German: The role of implicit and explicit prosody in sentence processing [Doctoral Dissertation]. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, MPI Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.
5.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BenjaminR. G.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.45.4.2
7.
BenjaminR. G.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.GroffC.KuhnM. R.SteinerL. (2013). A spectrographically grounded scale for evaluating reading expressiveness. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.43
8.
BinderK. S.TigheE.JiangY.KaftanskiK.QiC.ArdoinS. P. (2013). Reading expressively and understanding thoroughly: An examination of prosody in adults with low literacy skills. Reading & Writing, 26(5), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9382-7
9.
BrimoD.ApelK.FountainT. (2017). Examining the contributions of syntactic awareness and syntactic knowledge to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12050
10.
CainK. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship?Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716407070361
11.
CaletN.Gutierrez-PalmaN.DefiorS. (2015). A cross-sectional study of fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12019
12.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1999). Comprehensive assessments of spoken language. Western Psychological Services.
CowieR.Douglas-CowieE.WichmannA. (2002). Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8–10-year-old readers. Language and Speech, 45(1), 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450010301
15.
CuetosF.ArribasD.RamosJ. L. (2016). PROLEC-SE-R: Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores en Secundaria y Bachillerato, Revisada: Manual. TEA Ediciones.
16.
CuetosF.Martínez-GarcíaC.Suárez-CoallaP. (2018). Prosodic perception problems in Spanish dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1359273
17.
CuetosF.RodríguezB.RuanoE.ArribasD. (2007). Prolec-R. Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores revisada. TEA Ediciones.
18.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
19.
FernandesS.QueridoL.VerhaegheA.AraújoL. (2018). What is the relationship between reading prosody and reading comprehension in European Portuguese? Evidence from grades 2 to 5. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(S1), S102–S129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12248.
20.
GoddeE.BosseM. L.BaillyG. (2020). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09968-1
21.
González-TrujilloM. C.CaletN.DefiorS.Gutiérrez-PalmaN. (2014). Escala de fluidez lectora en español: Midiendo los componentes de la fluidez [Scale of reading fluency in Spanish: Measuring the components of fluency]. Estudios de Psicología, 35(1), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.893651.
22.
HairJ.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educacional International.
23.
HammillD.NewcomerP. L. (1996). Test of language development-intermediate. The Psychological Corporation.
24.
JordánN.CuetosF.Suárez-CoallaP. (2019). La Prosodia en la lectura de niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje [Prosody in the reading of children with specific language impairment]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 42(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1550161
25.
KimY.-S. G.QuinnJ. M.PetscherY. (2021). Reading prosody unpacked: A longitudinal investigation of its dimensionality and relation with word reading and listening comprehension for children in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000480
26.
KlaudaS. L.GuthrieJ. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
27.
KondoT.MazukaR. (1996). Prosodic planning while reading aloud: On-line examination of Japanese sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708578
28.
KoriatA.GreenbergS. N.KreinerH. (2002). The extraction of structure during reading: Evidence from reading prosody. Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195288
29.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.LevyB. A.RasinskiT. V. (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
30.
KuhnM. R.StahlS. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
31.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
LüdeckeD.Ben-ShacharM. S.PatilI.MakowskiD. (2021). Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139
34.
MillerJ.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018049
35.
MimeauC.LarocheA.DeaconS. H. (2018). The relation between syntactic awareness and contextual facilitation in word reading: What is the role of semantics?Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12260
36.
MokhtariK.ThompsonH. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070609558461
37.
NomveteP.EasterbrooksS. R. (2020). Phrase-reading mediates between words and syntax in struggling adolescent readers. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119825616
38.
PerfettiC. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In EhriL. C.TreimanR.GoughP. B. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Erlbaum.
39.
PerinettiG. (2018). Statips part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 5(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr5-17434
40.
PinnellG. S.PikulskiJ. J.WixsonK. K.CampbellJ. R.GoughP. B.BeattyA. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP’s integrated reading performance record (IRPR) at grade 4. The nation’s report card. Report no 23-FR-04. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
RasinskiT.HomanS.BiggsM. (2009). Teaching reading fluency to struggling readers: Method, materials, and evidence. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2–3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683622.
43.
RegoL. L. B.BryantP. E. (1993). The connection between phonological, syntactic, and semantic skills and children’s reading and spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174079
44.
RumelhartD. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In RuddellR. B.RuddellM. R.SingerH. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 864–894). International Reading Association.
45.
SabatiniJ.WangZ.O’ReillyT. (2018). Relating reading comprehension to oral reading performance in the NAEP fourth-grade special study of oral reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.226
46.
SamuelsS. J. (2006). Toward a model of reading fluency. In SamuelsS. J.FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24–46). International Reading Association.
47.
SandersE. A.KonoldT. R. (2023). X matters too: How the blended slope problem manifests differently in unilevel vs. multilevel models. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.9925
48.
SchwanenflugelP. J.HamiltonA. M.WisenbakerJ. M.KuhnM. R.StahlS. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119
49.
SchwanenflugelP. J.WestmorelandM. R.BenjaminR. G. (2015). Reading fluency skill and the prosodic marking of linguistic focus. Reading and Writing, 28(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9456-1.
50.
SeymourP. H.AroM.ErskineJ. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
51.
Suárez-CoallaP.Álvarez-CañizoM.MartínezC.GarcíaN.CuetosF. (2016). Reading prosody in Spanish dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0123-5.
52.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency (2nd ed.) (TOWRE-2). Pro-Ed.
53.
TrevethanR. (2017). Intraclass correlation coefficients: Clearing the air, extending some cautions, and making some requests. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 17(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-016-0156-6
54.
ValenciaS. W.SmithA. T.ReeceA. M.LiM.WixsonK. K.NewmanH. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.3.1
55.
VeenendaalN. J.GroenM. A.VerhoevenL. (2014). The role of speech prosody and text reading prosody in children’s reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12036.
56.
VeenendaalN. J.GroenM. A.VerhoevenL. (2015). What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12024.
57.
VeenendaalN. J.GroenM. A.VerhoevenL. (2016). Bidirectional relations between text reading prosody and reading comprehension in the upper primary school grades: A longitudinal perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1128939
58.
WechslerD. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed.). Pearson.
59.
WoltersA. P.KimY. S. G.SzuraJ. W. (2022). Is reading prosody related to reading comprehension? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1850733
60.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside.
YildizM.YildirimK.AtesS.RasinskiT.FitzgeraldS.ZimmermanB. (2014). The relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension in fifth-grade Turkish students. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2013.854187.
ZutellJ.RasinskiT. V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040584910954.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
