Reviewing Evidence on the Relations Between Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension for Adolescents

Abstract

In this article, I systematically review evidence on the relations between oral reading fluency (ORF) and reading comprehension (RC) for adolescents with limited reading proficiency (ALRP) in Grades 6 to12. I organized findings from 23 studies into five themes: (a) unclear role of ORF in the simple view of reading model for ALRP, (b) ALRP have distinct reader profiles, (c) ORF consists of more than automaticity, (d) the role of ORF varies, and (e) oral reading automaticity has tenuous predictive value for ALRP. Results suggest that knowledge of an adolescent’s ORF, as commonly defined and assessed, provides helpful information about an adolescent’s reader profile, but is not sufficient to evaluate instructional needs nor measure progress. I conclude the article with a discussion on implications for researchers, assessment developers, practitioners, and school administrators.

Keywords

fluency reading comprehension struggling readers adolescent literacy oral reading prosody

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adlof

S. M.

Catts

H. W.

Little

T. D.

(2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z

Baker

D. L.

Biancarosa

Park

B. J.

Bousselot

Smith

J.-L.

Baker

S. K.

Kame’enui

E. J.

Alonzo

Tindal

(2015). Validity of CBM measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension on high-stakes reading assessments in Grades 7 and 8. Reading and Writing, 28(1), 57–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9505-4

Baye

Inns

Lake

Slavin

R. E.

(2019). A synthesis of quantitative research on reading programs for secondary students. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.229

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

Billingsley

Nagy

(2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In Wolf

(Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383–414). York Press.

Biancarosa

Snow

(2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school reading [A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York] (2nd ed.). Alliance for Excellent Education.

Birch

Chase

(2004). Visual and language processing deficits in compensated and uncompensated college students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370050301

Brasseur-Hock

I. F.

Hock

M. F.

Kieffer

M. J.

Biancarosa

Deshler

D. D.

(2011). Adolescents struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.008

Carver

R. P.

(1993). Merging the simple view of reading with rauding theory. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547829

Catts

H. W.

(2018). The simple view of reading: Advancements and false impressions. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518767563

10.

Chomsky

(1978). When you still can’t read in the third grade: After decoding what? In Samuels

S. J.

(Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 13–30). International Reading Association.

11.

Cirino

P. T.

Romain

M. A.

Barth

A. E.

Tolar

T. D.

Fletcher

J. M.

Vaughn

(2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3

12.

Clemens

N. H.

Oslund

Oi-man

Fogarty

Simmons

Davis

J. L.

(2019). Skill moderators of the effects of a reading comprehension intervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291878739

13.

Clemens

N. H.

Simmons

L. E.

Wang

Kwok

O. M.

(2017). The prevalence of reading fluency and vocabulary difficulties among adolescents struggling with reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(8), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916662120

14.

Corkett

J. K.

Hein

S. F.

Parrila

(2008). Compensating for reading difficulties: A qualitative investigation of university students’ experiences of influential personal characteristics. Exceptionality Education International, 18(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v18i2.7624

15.

Cutting

L. E.

Materek

Cole

C. A. S.

Levine

T. M.

Mahone

E. M.

(2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0022-0

16.

Cutting

L. E.

Scarborough

H. S.

(2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5

17.

Deeney

T. A.

(2010). One-minute fluency measures: Mixed messages in assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63(6), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.6.1

18.

Dennis

D. V.

(2012). Heterogeneity or homogeneity: What assessment data reveal about struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468431

19.

Denton

C. A.

Barth

A. E.

Fletcher

J. M.

Wexler

Vaughn

Cirino

P. T.

Francis

D. J.

(2011). The relations among oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension in middle school: Implications for identification and instruction of students with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623546

20.

Deshler

D. D.

Hock

M. F.

(2007). Adolescent literacy: Where we are, where we need to go. In Pressley

Billman

A. K.

Perry

K. H.

Reffitt

K. E.

Reynolds

J. M.

(Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 98–128). Guilford Publications.

21.

Eason

S. H.

Sabatini

Goldberg

Bruce

Cutting

L. E.

(2013). Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.652722

22.

Ehren

B. J.

(2005). Looking for evidence-based practice in reading comprehension instruction. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(4), 310–321.

23.

Ehren

B. J.

Lenz

B. K.

Deshler

D. D.

(2004). Enhancing literacy proficiency in adolescents and young adults. In Stone

Silliman

Ehren

Apel

(Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 600–625). Guilford Press.

24.

Fink

R. P.

(1998). Literacy development in successful men and women with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 48(1), 311–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-998-0014-5

25.

Francis

D. J.

Kulesz

P. A.

Benoit

J. S.

(2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVRi). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518772904

26.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Hosp

M. K.

Jenkins

J. R.

(2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3

27.

Gelbar

N. W.

Bray

Kehle

T. J.

Madaus

J. W.

Makel

(2018). Exploring the nature of compensation strategies in individuals with dyslexia. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 33(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573516677187

28.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

29.

Hallinger

(2014). Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership an empirical assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13506594

30.

Hasbrouck

Glaser

D. R.

(2012). Reading fluency: Understanding and teaching this complex skill. Gibson Hasbrouck & Associates.

31.

Hasbrouck

Tindal

(2017). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702). Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon. https://www.brtprojects.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/TechRpt_1702ORFNorms2.pdf

32.

Herrera

Truckenmiller

A. J.

Foorman

B. R.

(2016). Summary of 20 years of research on the effectiveness of adolescent literacy programs and practices (REL 2016-178). Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.

33.

Hock

M. F.

Brasseur

I. F.

Deshler

D. D.

Catts

H. W.

Marquis

J. G.

Mark

C. A.

Stribling

J. W.

(2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescents with limited reading proficiency in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/25474660

34.

Hoover

W. A.

Gough

P. B.

(1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799

35.

Hoover

W. A.

Tunmer

W. E.

(2018). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154

36.

International Literacy Association. (2018). Reading fluently does not mean reading fast [Literacy leadership brief]. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/ila-reading-fluently-does-not-mean-reading-fast.pdf

37.

International Reading Association. (2012). Adolescent literacy (Position statement, Revised Rev. 2012 ed.). https://www.ttac.vt.edu/content/dam/ttac_vt_edu/Adolescent_Literacy_Position.pdf

38.

Kamil

M. L.

Borman

G. D.

Dole

Kral

C. C.

Salinger

Torgesen

(2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES practice guide (NCEE 2008-4027). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

39.

Kershaw

Schatschneider

(2012). A Latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9278-3

40.

Kuhn

M. R.

Schwanenflugel

P. J.

(2019). Prosody, pacing, and situational fluency (or why fluency matters for older readers). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(4), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.867

41.

Kuhn

M. R.

Schwanenflugel

P. J.

Meisinger

E. B.

(2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4

42.

LaRusso

Kim

H. Y.

Selman

Uccelli

Dawson

Jones

Snow

(2016). Contributions of academic language, perspective taking, and complex reasoning to deep reading comprehension. Journal of Research of Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035

43.

Leko

M. M.

Chiu

M. M.

Roberts

C. A.

(2018). Individual and contextual factors related to secondary special education teachers’ reading instructional practices. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917727514

44.

Lenth

R. V.

(2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317098149

45.

Lesaux

N. K.

Kieffer

M. J.

(2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209355469

46.

Machi

L. A.

McEvoy

B. T.

(2012). The literature review: Six steps to success (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

47.

Moher

Liberati

A. A.

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, Article b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

48.

National Reading Panel, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

49.

Niebling

R. B.

Lovell

(2015). Never too late: Why ESEA must fill the missing middle. Alliance for Excellent Education. http://www.all4ed.org

50.

Nomvete

Easterbrooks

S. R.

(2020). Phrase-reading mediates between words and syntax in struggling adolescent readers. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119825616

51.

Paige

D. D.

(2011). Engaging struggling adolescent readers through situational interest: A model proposing the relationships among extrinsic motivation, oral reading proficiency, comprehension, and academic achievement. Reading Psychology, 32(5), 395–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.495633

52.

Paige

D. D.

Rasinski

T. V.

Magpuri-Lavell

(2012). Is fluent, expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(1), 67–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23367761

53.

Paige

D. D.

Rasinski

T. V.

Magpuri-Lavell

Smith

G. S.

(2014). Interpreting the relationships among prosody, automaticity, accuracy, and silent reading comprehension in secondary students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14535170

54.

Paris

S. G.

Carpenter

R. D.

Paris

A. H.

Hamilton

E. E

. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children’s reading comprehension. In Paris

S. G.

Stahl

S. A.

(Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131–160). Routledge.

55.

Perfetti

C. A.

Landi

Oakhill

(2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling

M. J.

Hulme

(Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch13

56.

Petticrew

Roberts

(2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

57.

Pikulski

J. J.

Chard

D. J.

(2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.6.2

58.

Pinnell

G. S.

Pikulski

J. J.

Wixson

K. K.

Campbell

J. R.

Gough

P. B.

Beatty

A. S.

(1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP’s Integrated Reading Performance Record (IRPR) at grade four (Report No. CS 011970, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED378550). National Center for Education Statistics.

59.

Rasinski

T. V.

(1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885946

60.

Reschly

A. L.

Busch

T. W.

Betts

Deno

S. L.

Long

J. D.

(2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47(6), 427–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001

61.

Rethlefsen

M. L.

Kirtley

Waffenschmidt

Ayala

A. P.

Moher

Page

M. J.

Koffel

J. B.

(2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), Article 39.

62.

Reynolds

(2021). Of research reviews and practice guides: Translating rapidly growing research on adolescent literacy into updated practice recommendations. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.314

63.

Ritchey

K. D.

Silverman

R. D.

Schatschneider

Speece

D. L.

(2015). Prediction and stability of reading problems in middle childhood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498116

64.

Sáenz

L. M.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932502

65.

Samuels

S. J.

(2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 563–566.

66.

Savage

(2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_2

67.

Shanahan

(2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101

68.

Shinn

M. R.

Shinn

M. M.

Hamilton

Clarke

(2002). Using curriculum-based measurement in general education classrooms to promote reading success. In Shinn

M. R.

Walker

H. M.

Stoner

(Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Prevention and remedial approaches (pp. 113–142). National Association of School Psychologists.

69.

Slavin

R. E.

Cheung

Groff

Lake

(2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.4

70.

Snow

C. E.

(2018). Simple and not-so-simple views of reading. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518770288

71.

Tighe

E. L.

Schatschneider

(2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9435-6

72.

Tilstra

McMaster

Van den Broek

Kendeou

Rapp

(2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x

73.

Tolar

T. D.

Barth

A. E.

Fletcher

J. M.

Francis

D. J.

Vaughn

(2014). Predicting reading outcomes with progress monitoring slopes among middle grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.11.001

74.

Tunmer

W. E.

Chapman

J. W.

(2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685

75.

Valencia

S. W.

Smith

A. T.

Reece

A. M.

Wixson

K. K.

Newman

(2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.3.1

76.

Washburn

Billingsley

(2018). Leading effective meetings with professionals and families. In McLeskey

Maheady

Billingsly

Brownell

M. T.

Lewis

T. J.

(Eds.), High leverage practices in inclusive classrooms (pp. 15–33). Routledge.

77.

Wayman

M. M.

Wallace

Wiley

H. I.

Tichá

Espin

C. A.

(2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401

78.

Zutell

Rasinski

T. V.

(1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502