Researchers largely rely on child language and literacy measures to determine the effectiveness of interventions for Latino dual language learners. However, some of these measures may miss certain strengths of these students. This study identified two unstandardized language and literacy tasks (IDELA food and animal vocabulary and personal narratives) that might leverage some eco-cultural assets of Latino children; it also examined concurrent associations between these tasks and standardized language and literacy tests. Participants were 237 Latino kindergarteners (M age = 67.22 months, SD = 4.12; 51% female). Positive associations were found between standardized tests and the IDELA food and animal vocabulary (β = 0.92–1.40; large magnitude) and personal narrative tasks (β = 0.28–0.46; medium magnitude), controlling for important covariates, including the language of administration of assessment. Further research might use these tasks as complementary assessments to gauge the impact of interventions on the language and literacy skills of Latino dual-language learners in kindergarten.
AugustD.SnowC.CarloM., et al. (2006). Literacy development in elementary school second-language learners. Topics in Language Disorders, 26(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200610000-00007
BermanR. (2001). Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In NelsonK. E.Aksu-KoçA.JohnsonC. E. (Eds.), Children's language: Developing narrative and discourse competence (Vol. 10, pp. 1–30). Erlbaum.
4.
CastañedaC.CallananM.ShirefleyT., et al. (2022) Early strengths in science: Young children’s conversations about nature in Latine families. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 83, 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101453
5.
CastroD.PáezM.DickinsonD., et al. (2011). Promoting language and literacy in young dual language learners: Research, practice, and policy. Child Development Perspectives, 5(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00142.x
6.
ConboyB.ThalD. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77(3), 712–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00899.x
7.
CurentonS.JusticeL. (2004). African American and Caucasian preschoolers’ use of decontextualized language: Literate language features in oral narratives. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 240–253. https://https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/023)
8.
DickinsonD.GriffithJ.GolinkoffR., et al. (2012). How Reading books fosters language development around the world. Child Development Research, 2012, 1–16. https://https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/602807
9.
EisenbergA. (2002). Maternal teaching talk within families of Mexican descent: Influences of task and socioeconomic status. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986302024002006
10.
EvansA.ChowS.JenningsR., et al. (2011). Traditional foods and practices of Spanish-speaking Latina mothers influence the home food environment: Implications for future interventions. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111(7), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.007
11.
FiestasE.PeñaC. (2004). Narrative discourse in bilingual children: Language and task effects. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35, 155–168. https://https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/016)
12.
FloritE.CainK. (2011). The simple view of Reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies?Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553–576. https://https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
13.
Garcia-CollC.LambertyG.JenkinsR., et al. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01834.x
GennetianL.CabreraN.CrosbyD., et al. (2021). A strength-based framework for realizing Latino young children’s potential. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322211033618
16.
GriffinT.HemphillL.CampL.WolfD. (2004). Oral discourse in the preschool years and later literacy skills. First Language, 24(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723704042369
17.
Gutiérrez-ClellenV. (2002). Narratives in two languages: Assessing performance of bilingual children. Linguistics and Education, 13(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00061-4
18.
HammerC.BurchinalM.HongS., et al. (2020). Change in language and literacy knowledge for Spanish–English dual language learners at school-entry: Analyses from three studies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.07.001
19.
HammerC.JiaG.UchikoshiY. (2011). Language and literacy development of dual language learners growing up in the United States: A call for research. Child Development Perspectives, 5(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00140.x
20.
HammerC.SawyerB. (2016). Effects of a culturally responsive interactive book-Reading intervention on the language abilities of preschool dual language learners: A pilot study. NHSA Dialog, 18(4), 59–79.
21.
HughesD.McGillivrayL.SchmidekM. (1997). Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Thinking Publications.
22.
KabutoB. (2017). A socio-psycholinguistic perspective on biliteracy: The use of miscue analysis as a culturally relevant assessment tool. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 56, 25–44. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol56/iss1/2
23.
KermaniH.JanesH. A. (1999). Adjustment across task in maternal scaffolding in low-income Latino immigrant families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986399212002
24.
LeyvaD.BerrocalM.NolivosV. (2014). Spanish-speaking parent-child emotional narratives and children’s social problemsolving skills. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725188
25.
LeyvaD.ShapiroA.Yeomans-MaldonadoG. et al. (2022b). Positive impacts of a strengths-based family program on Latino kindergarteners’ narrative language abilities. Developmental Psychology, 58(5), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001332
26.
LeyvaD.WeilandC.ShapiroA. et al. (2022a). A strengths-based, culturally responsive family intervention improves Latino kindergarteners’ vocabulary and approaches to learning. Child Development, 93(2), 451–467. https://doi.org/101111/cdev.13698
27.
LittleR. J.RubinD. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (Vol. 793). Wiley & Sons.
28.
LuceroA. (2015). Cross-linguistic lexical, grammatical, and discourse performance on oral narrative retells among young Spanish speakers. Child Development, 86(5), 1419–1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12387
29.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Computational tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.
30.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.GreenfaderC.OchoaW. (2018). Spanish-speaking preschoolers’ conceptual vocabulary knowledge: Towards more comprehensive assessment. HS Dialog: The Research to Practice Journal for the Early Childhood Field, 21(1), 22–49. https://journals.charlotte.edu/dialog/article/view/751
31.
McCabeA. (1997). Developmental and cross-cultural aspects of children's narration. In BambergM. (Ed.), Narrative development: Six approaches (pp. 137–174). Erlbaum.
32.
McCabeA.RollinsP. (1994). Assessment of preschool narrative skills. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0301.45
33.
MelziG. (2000). Cultural variations in the construction of personal narratives: Central American and European American mothers’ elicitation styles. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3002_04
34.
MillerJ.HeilmannJ.NockertsA., et al. (2006). Oral language and Reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(1), 30–43. https://10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00205.x
National Early Literacy Panel (2008). Developing early literacy: Report from the national early literacy panel. A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications. https://lincs.ed.gov/publications/pdf/NELPReport09.pdf
39.
OllerD.OearsonB.Cobo-LewisA. (2007). Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 191–230. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0142716407070117
40.
Perez-GranadosD.CallananM. (1997). Parents and siblings as early resources for young children’s learning in Mexican-descent families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.11.77/07399863970191001
41.
PetersonC.JessoB.McCabeA. (1999). Encouraging narratives in preschoolers: An intervention study. Journal of Child Language, 26(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003651
42.
PetersonC.McCabeA. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. Plenum Press.
PisaniL.BorisovaI.DowdA. (2015). International development and early learning assessment technical working paper. Save the Children.
45.
PisaniL.BorisovaI.DowdA. (2018). Developing and validating the international development and early learning assessment (IDELA). International Journal of Educational Research, 91, 1–15. https://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.007
46.
ReeseE.HadenC.Baker-WardL., et al. (2011). Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(4), 424–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.587854
47.
ReeseE.LeyvaD.SparksA., et al. (2010). Maternal elaborative reminiscing increases low-income children’s narrative skills relative to dialogic Reading. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 318–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.481552
48.
ReeseE.SparksA.SuggateS. (2012). Assessing children’s narratives. In HoffE. (Ed.), Research methods in child language: A practical guide (pp. 133–148). Blackwell.
49.
RoweM. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.x
50.
SalinasC. (2020). The complexity of the “x” in Latinx: How Latinx/a/o students related to, identify with and understand the term Latinx. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 19(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192719900382
SchickA. (2014). Home-school literacy experiences of Latino preschoolers: Does continuity predict positive child outcomes?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.05.006
53.
SchrankF.McGrewK.RuefM., et al. (2005). Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz Assessment Service Bulletin Number 1: Overview and Technical Supplement. www.woodcock-munoz.com
54.
SilvaM.McCabeA. (1996). Vignettes of the continuous and family ties: Some Latino American traditions. In McCabeA. (Ed.), Chameleon readers: Teaching children to appreciate all kinds of good stories (pp. 116–136). McGraw Hill.
55.
SolisG.CallananM. (2016). Evidence against deficit accounts: Conversations about science in Mexican heritage families living in the United States. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 212–224. https://https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1196493
56.
SquiresK.Lugo-NerisM.PeñaE., et al. (2014). Story retelling by bilingual children with language impairments and typically developing controls. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12044
57.
StorchS.WhitehurstG. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to Reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
58.
TenenbaumH.LeaperC. (1997). Mothers’ and fathers’ questions to their child in Mexican-descent families: Moderators of cognitive demand during play. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863970193005
59.
UccelliP.Demir-LiraE.RoweM., et al. (2019). Children’s early decontextualized talk predicts academic language proficiency in midadolescence. Child Development, 90(5), 1650–1663. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13034
60.
UccelliP.PaezM. (2007). Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills. LSHSS, 38, 225–236. https://https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2007/024)
VerhoevenL.Van LeeuweJ. (2008). Prediction of the development of Reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1414
63.
WestbyC. (1991). Learning to talk, talking to learn: Oral literate language differences. In SimonC. S. (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success (pp. 334–357). Thinking Publications.
64.
WolfS.HalpinP.YoshikawaH., et al. (2017). Measuring school readiness globally: Assessing the construct validity and measurement invariance of the international development and early learning assessment (IDELA) in Ethiopia. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 21–36. https://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.05.001
65.
WoodcockR. W.Muñoz-SandovalA. F.RuefM., et al. (2005). Woodcock Muñoz Language Survey–Revised. Riverside Publishing.
66.
YoshikawaH.LeyvaD.SnowC., et al. (2015). Experimental impacts of a teacher professional development program in Chile on preschool classroom quality and child outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 51(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038785
67.
ZenkovK.PellegrinoA.HarmonJ., et al. (2013). Picturing culturally relevant literacy practices: Using photography to see how literacy pedagogies matter to urban youth. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 15(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v15i2.555
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
