Abstract
As sustainability reporting has become mainstream, questions remain about whether disclosed stakeholder engagement supports more democratic forms of corporate accountability. This study examines the extent to which stakeholder engagement disclosures in sustainability reports reflect practices associated with stakeholder democracy and how these disclosures have evolved over time. Using a qualitative content analysis of sustainability reports from 50 mining and energy companies, comparing 2015 and 2022 disclosures, we find that engagement remains predominantly indirect, uneven across stakeholder groups, limited in its inclusion of marginalized groups, and weakly specified. While some companies broadened and diversified their disclosures, others stagnated or regressed. The study contributes to sustainability reporting research by showing that breadth, depth, and uptake are complementary dimensions for assessing disclosed stakeholder engagement. We argue that the mainstreaming of sustainability reporting has not systematically translated into broader inclusion, stronger dialogic practices, or greater uptake of stakeholder input into organizational processes.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
