On the basis of agency theory and upper echelons theory, this study examines the moderating role of executive experience in the relationship between earnings pressure and firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. We argue that earnings pressure negatively impacts ESG performance, as it leads executives to prioritize short-term financial gains over ESG activities with uncertain or delayed financial returns. Moreover, we posit that executives with environmental experience are less likely to reduce ESG efforts under earnings pressure, whereas those with MBA backgrounds are more inclined to do so. Using a fixed effects model, we empirically analyze data from Chinese listed manufacturing firms (2010–2021), finding strong support for these hypotheses. This research enhances our understanding of ESG performance under earnings pressure and offers valuable insights for promoting sustainable corporate development.
AaboT.GioriciI. C. (2023). Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores?Global Finance Journal, 56(3), 100722.
2.
AhmedM. S.KumarS. (2023). Are MBA CEOs really more risk-averse?International Review of Financial Analysis, 16(4), 102804.
3.
AluchnaM.Roszkowska-MenkesM.KamińskiB.Bosek-RakD. (2022). Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective. Journal of Business Research, 142(2), 674–682.
4.
AmranA.Nabiha Abdul KhalidS.Abdul RazakD.HaronH. (2010). Development of MBA with specialisation in sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3), 260–273.
5.
ArmstrongW. J.GencE.VerbeekM. (2019). Going for gold: An analysis of morningstar analyst ratings. Management Science, 65(5), 2310–2327.
6.
Asante-AppiahB.LambertT. A. (2023). The role of the external auditor in managing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputation risk. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(1), 2589–2641.
7.
AwanT. M.ZhangX.ZhouY.ZhouZ. (2022). Does media usage affect pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 82(2), 307–317.
8.
BansalP.SongH. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149.
9.
BarnettM. L.SalomonR. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.
10.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
11.
BascleG.JungJ. (2023). Caught in an expectations trap: Risks of giving securities analysts what they expect. Organization Science, 34(1), 176–196.
12.
BenlemlihM.BitarM.OuadghiriI. E.PeillexJ. (2024). Financial analyst coverage and corporate environmental disclosure. British Journal of Management, 35(3), 1609–1631.
13.
BergF.KölbelJ. F.RigobonR. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
14.
BrochetF.LoumiotiM.SerafeimG. (2015). Speaking of the short-term: Disclosure horizon and managerial myopia. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(3), 1122–1163.
15.
BurbanoV. C.DelmasM. A.CoboM. J. (2024). The past and future of corporate sustainability research. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 133–158.
16.
BurkeJ. J. (2022). Do boards take environmental, social, and governance issues seriously? Evidence from media coverage and CEO dismissals. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(4), 647–671.
17.
BuschT.BarnettM. L.BurrittR. L.CashoreB. W.FreemanR. E.HenriquesI.HustedB. W.PanwarR.PinkseJ.SchalteggerS.YorkJ. (2024). Moving beyond “the” business case: How to make corporate sustainability work. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 776–787.
18.
CambreaD. R.PaoloneF.CucariN. (2023). Advisory or monitoring role in ESG scenario: Which women directors are more influential in the Italian context?Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4299–4314.
19.
CaoY.HaoR.YangY. G. (2024). National culture and analysts’ forecasting. Review of Accounting Studies, 29(2), 1147–1191.
20.
CaoZ.WangR.XiaoX.YinC. (2023). Disseminating information across connected firms — Analyst site visits can help. Journal of Empirical Finance, 72(1), 510–531.
21.
CardilloG.BendinelliE.TorluccioG. (2023). COVID-19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 602–623.
22.
CaskeyJ.OzelN. B. (2017). Earnings expectations and employee safety. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 63(1), 121–141.
23.
ChenJ.CummingD.HouW.LeeE. (2016). Does the external monitoring effect of financial analysts deter corporate fraud in China?Journal of Business Ethics, 134(4), 727–742.
24.
ChenJ.LienW.MillerD.ChenT. (2024). Competitive actions under analyst pressure: The role of CEO time horizons. Journal of Management Studies, 61(5), 1916–1945.
25.
ChenL.WangT. (2023). Effect of supplier cost stickiness on environmental, social, and governance: Moderating role of customer bargaining power. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2304–2314.
26.
ChenZ.XieG. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83(2), 102291.
27.
CohenS.KadachI.OrmazabalG.ReichelsteinS. (2023). Executive compensation tied to ESG performance: International evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3), 805–853.
28.
CooperE. W.UzunH. (2022). Busy outside directors and ESG performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 23(1), 1–20.
29.
CorreiaS.GuimarãesP.ZylkinT. (2020). Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. The Stata Journal, 20(1), 95–115.
30.
CurrimI. S.LimJ.ZhangY. (2018). Effect of analysts’ earnings pressure on marketing spending and stock market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3), 431–452.
31.
DikolliS. S.FrankM. M.GuoZ. M.LynchL. J. (2022). Walk the talk: ESG mutual fund voting on shareholder proposals. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 864–896.
32.
Duque-GrisalesE.Aguilera-CaracuelJ. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334.
FestingerL. (1957). Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
35.
GentryR. J.ShenW. (2013). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 121–130.
36.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.
37.
GrahamJ. R.HarveyC. R.RajgopalS. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3–73.
38.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
39.
HeF.GuoX.YueP. (2024). Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91(2), 103003.
40.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
41.
HomroyS.MavrukT.NguyenV. D. (2023). ESG-Linked compensation, CEO skills, and shareholder welfare. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 12(4), 939–985.
42.
HuangC.HoK. (2023). Does the presence of executives with a legal background affect stock price crash risk?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1), 55–82.
43.
HuangJ.HanF.LiY. (2023). Government as major customer: The effects of government procurement on corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Finance Research Letters, 54(3), 103781.
44.
HuangR.WeiJ. (2023). Does CEOs’ green experience affect environmental corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79(3), 205–231.
45.
HussainS.SuC. (2024). The impact of analyst, CEO, and firm reputations on investors in the UK and Japanese stock markets. British Journal of Management, 35(1), 259–280.
46.
HustedB. W.Sousa-FilhoJ. M. D. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102(3), 220–227.
47.
ImbrogianoJ.SchalteggerS.BoiralO. (2025). Management responses to climate change: An analysis of scholarly recommendations. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/org/10.1002/sd.3480
48.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
49.
JiangF.KimK. A. (2020). Corporate governance in China: A survey. Review of Finance, 24(4), 733–772.
50.
JiangF.ShiW.ZhengX. (2020). Board chairs and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 112(5), 109–118.
51.
JingC.KeaseyK.LimI.XuB. (2023). Analyst coverage and corporate environmental policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(4), 1–34.
52.
JungJ.ShinT. (2019). Learning not to diversify: The transformation of graduate business education and the decline of diversifying acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(2), 337–369.
53.
KalliasA.KalliasK.TsalkamasI.ZhangS. (2023). One size does not fit all: The conditional role of CEO education on IPO performance. Journal of Business Research, 157(4), 113560.
54.
KimJ. H.KwakJ.ParkH. (2024). ESG as a nonmarket strategy to cope with geopolitical tension: Empirical evidence from multinationals’ ESG performance. Strategic Management Journal, 46(3), 693–722.
55.
LeeK.HalesR. (2022). Reflections and reflective practice to advance responsible management education for sustainability: The case of an Australian MBA programme. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(5), 1158–1172.
56.
LewbelA. (1997). Constructing instruments for regressions with measurement error when no additional data are available, with an application to patents and R&D. Econometrica, 65(5), 1201–1213.
57.
LewisB. W.WallsJ. L.DowellG. W. S. (2014). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 712–722.
58.
LiX.GuoF.WangJ. (2024). A path towards enterprise environmental performance improvement: How does CEO green experience matter?Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 820–838.
59.
LimE. (2024). Balancing multiple goals: The effects of performance shortfalls relative to aspirations vs. Analysts’ earnings forecasts. Journal of Management Studies, 62(4), 1491–1523.
60.
LiuH.ZhangZ. (2023). The impact of managerial myopia on environmental, social and governance (ESG) engagement: Evidence from Chinese firms. Energy Economics, 122(1), 106705.
61.
LiuJ.XiongX.GaoY.ZhangJ. (2023). The impact of institutional investors on ESG: Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance, 63(Suppl. 2), 2801–2826.
62.
LiuX.Cifuentes-FauraJ.ZhaoS.WangL. (2024). The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102124.
63.
LiuY.ZhangF.ZhangH. (2024). CEO foreign experience and corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3331–3355.
64.
LiuZ.ShenH.WelkerM.ZhangN.ZhaoY. (2021). Gone with the wind: An externality of earnings pressure. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 72(1), 101403.
65.
LohwasserE.ZhouY. (2024). Earnings management, auditor changes and ethics: Evidence from companies missing earnings expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 191(2), 551–570.
66.
LongL.WangC.ZhangM. (2025). Does social media pressure induce corporate hypocrisy? Evidence of ESG greenwashing from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 197, 311–338.
67.
LuZ.LiangY.HuY.LiuY. (2024). Is managerial myopia detrimental to corporate ESG performance?International Review of Economics & Finance, 92(5), 998–1015.
68.
MaddalaG. S. (1983) Limited-dependent Variables in Economics. Cambridge University Press.
69.
MillerD.XuX. (2019). MBA CEOs, short-term management and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 285–300.
70.
NekhiliM.BoukadhabaA.NagatiH. (2021). The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter?Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(2), 134–161.
71.
NeubaumD. A.PagellM.DrexlerJ. A.McKee-RyanF. M.LarsonE. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: An empirical response to critics. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 9–24.
72.
OliverA. G.CampbellR.GraffinS.BundyJ. (2023). Media coverage of earnings announcements: How newsworthiness shapes media volume and tone. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1213–1245.
73.
PanC.SuX.ZhongX. (2025). Not all faultlines are created equal: The heterogeneous impact of TMT faultlines on a firm’s ESG disclosure. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 2(34), 489–506.
74.
PayneJ. L.RobbS. W. G. (2000). Earnings management: The effect of ex ante earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15(4), 371–392.
75.
QianC.CrillyD.LinY.ZhangK.ZhangR. (2023). Short-selling pressure and workplace safety: Curbing Short-Termism through stakeholder interdependencies. Organization Science, 34(1), 358–379.
76.
QuanX.KeY.QianY.ZhangY. (2023). CEO foreign experience and green innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(2), 535–557.
77.
RasoolN.ArunachalamM.WellalageN. H.KumarV. (2025). Unveiling the relationship between ESG and growth of unlisted firms: Empirical insights from Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/org/10.1002/bse.4257
78.
ReimW.TabaresS.ParidaV. (2025). Small and medium-sized enterprises and the circular economy: Leveraging ecosystem strategies for circular business model implementation. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266251325247
79.
RenG.ZengP.ZhongX. (2024). Differentiation strategies and firms’ environmental, social and governance: The different moderating effects of historical and social performance shortfalls. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 719–740.
80.
RenL.ZhongX.WanL. (2022). Missing analyst forecasts and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(1), 171–194.
81.
RenS.SunH.TangY. (2023). CEO’s hometown identity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 49(7), 2455–2489.
82.
RussoM. V.LoucheC.WagnerM. (2024). A solid foundation but what will be built on it? Reviews of the management, organizations, and environmental sustainability field. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 119–132.
83.
SchalteggerS.GirschikV.Trittin-UlbrichH.WeissbrodI.DaudigeosT. (2024). Corporate change agents for sustainability: Transforming organizations from the inside out. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(2), 145–156.
84.
SchalteggerS.HansenE. G.Lüdeke-FreundF. (2015). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.
85.
SchalteggerS.LoorbachD.HörischJ. (2023). Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(2), 891–902.
86.
SchalteggerS.SynnestvedtT. (2002). The link between “green” and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339–346.
87.
SchulerD. A.ShiW.HoskissonR. E.ChenT. (2017). Windfalls of emperors’ sojourns: Stock market reactions to Chinese firms hosting high-ranking government officials. Strategic Management Journal, 38(8), 1668–1687.
88.
SchulzA.WiersemaM. F. (2018). The impact of earnings expectations on corporate downsizing. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2691–2702.
89.
ShenF.LiJ.ChenJ.WangW. (2023). Exploring young consumers’ intention to pay for shared express packaging: A multi-study analysis. Journal of Business Research, 167(1), 114153.
90.
SuR.ShuiX.DuJ. (2023). Institutional pressures and corporate green innovation: Evidence from Chinese public enterprises. Organization & Environment, 36(3), 442–467.
91.
SunH.ZhuJ.WangT.WangY. (2021). MBA CEOs and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290(3), 125801.
92.
TianZ.ZhuB.LuY. (2023). The governance of non-state shareholders and corporate ESG: Empirical evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56(2), 104162.
93.
WagnerM. (2005). How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(2), 105–118.
94.
WagnerM.SchalteggerS. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5), 557–572.
95.
WallsJ. L.HoffmanA. J. (2013). Exceptional boards: Environmental experience and positive deviance from institutional norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 253–271.
96.
WanH.FuJ.ZhongX. (2024). ESG performance and firms’ innovation efficiency: The moderating role of state-owned firms and regional market development. Business Process Management Journal, 30(1), 270–290.
97.
WangD.WangY.ZhouM. (2024). Can environmental tax promote green M&A in emerging market firms? Evidence from China’s heavy polluters. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(3), 1100–1111.
98.
WangJ.MaM.DongT.ZhangZ. (2023). Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance’s ESG ratings. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87(3), 102623.
99.
WenzigJ.NuzumA. K.SchalteggerS. (2023). Path dependence of accountants: Why are they not involved in corporate sustainability?Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2662–2683.
100.
WuY. J.HuangS.KuoL.WuW. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 520–531.
101.
XueS.XuY.ChenH. (2024). Corporate social performance feedback and corporate social responsibility decoupling in China: The salience of legitimacy and/or efficiency. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(24), 3164–3180.
102.
YaseminK. Y.TanD. (2025). Interactive effects of CEOs’ firm-specific experience and versatile experiences on pursuit of new growth opportunity. Journal of Management, 51(2), 913–941.
103.
YinJ.LiJ.MaJ. (2023). The Effects of CEO Awards on corporate social responsibility focus. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(1), 897–916.
104.
YuE. P.LuuB. V. (2021). International variations in ESG disclosure: Do cross-listed companies care more?International Review of Financial Analysis, 75(2), 101731.
105.
ZahidR. M. A.KhanM. K.AnwarW.MaqsoodU. S. (2022). The role of audit quality in the ESG-corporate financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Western European companies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(12), S200–S212.
106.
ZhangM.WangA.ZhouS. (2023). Effect of analysts’ earnings pressure on environmental information disclosure of firms: Can corporate governance alleviate the earnings obsession?Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(2), 495–515.
107.
ZhangY.GimenoJ. (2016). Earnings pressure and long-term corporate governance: Can long-term-oriented investors and managers reduce the quarterly earnings obsession?Organization Science, 27(2), 354–372.
108.
ZhangY.GongY. (2018). Stock return or sales growth? Multiple performance feedback and strategic investments under securities analysts’ earnings pressure. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1356–1385.
109.
ZhongX.HuangC.RenG. (2024). Local gambling culture and enterprise bribery: A social norms theory perspective. Management and Organization Review, 20(3), 466–486.
110.
ZhongX.RenG. (2024). Digitalization and firms’ innovation efficiency: Do corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility matter?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 52(3), 1–33.
111.
ZhongX.RenL.SongT. (2022). Beyond market strategies: How multiple Decision-Maker groups jointly influence underperforming firms’ corporate social (Ir)responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(2), 481–499.
112.
ZhuZ.SongT.JianbinH.ZhongX. (2024). Executive cognitive structure, digital policy, and firms’ digital transformation. IEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71(1), 2579–2592.
