Research on meaning-making has recently enriched our understanding of sustainable entrepreneurship by providing a window into the moral space and the complex reality of entrepreneurs who engage with sustainability issues. This article focuses on meaning-making of one such entrepreneur to explore the role of nature as enabler of sustainable entrepreneurship nexus. It is based on the ethnographic study of the entrepreneur who makes a living out of his pioneering work with forest gardening in Sweden. The transition in meanings that guide the relationship of the entrepreneur with nature, which comes out of the intimate, recursive, and informative exchanges with the ecosystem, makes it possible for nature to come in as a partner and progressively enable the creation of the regenerative venture over time. The emerging regenerative narrative of entrepreneurship stretches beyond the current theories and sets the agenda for ecocentric theorizing about this creative human activity.
AllenS.CunliffeA. L.Easterby-SmithM. (2019). Understanding sustainability through the lens of ecocentric radical-reflexivity: Implications for management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 781-795. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3420-3
2.
BansalP.KimA.WoodM. O. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Academy of Management Review, 43, 217-241.
3.
BenyusJ. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
4.
BerkesF. (2008). Sacred ecology. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BjörklundJ.EksvärdK.SchafferC. (2018). Exploring the potential of edible forest gardens: Experiences from a participatory action research project in Sweden. Agroforestry Systems, 1-12. doi:10.1007/s10457-018-0208-8
6.
BoonsF. (2013). Organizing within dynamic ecosystems: Conceptualizing socio-ecological mechanisms. Organization and Environment, 26, 281-297.
7.
BranzeiO.ParkerS. C.MorozP. W.GambleE. (2018). Going pro-social: Extending the individual-venture nexus to the collective level. Journal of Business Venturing, 33, 551-565.
8.
CampbellK. (2006). Women, Mother Earth and the business of living. In SteyaertC.HjorthD. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change—A third movements in entrepreneurship book (pp. 165-187). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
9.
ChazdonR. L. (2008). Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 320(5882), 1458-1460.
10.
ClarkB.YorkR. (2005). Dialectical materialism and nature: An alternative to economism and deep ecology. Organization & Environment, 18, 318-337.
11.
CopeJ. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29, 373-397.
12.
CrawfordM. (2010). Creating a forest garden: Working with nature to grow edible crops. Totnes, England: Green Books.
13.
CunliffeA. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 647-673.
14.
DalyH. E. (1974). The economics of the steady state. American Economic Review, 64(2), 15-21.
15.
DavidssonP. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 674-695.
16.
DiamondJ. (2005). Collapse. How societies chose to fail or succeed. New York, NY: Viking Press.
17.
FergusonR. S.LovellS. T. (2014). Permaculture for agroecology: Design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 251-274.
18.
FisherA. (2002). Radical ecopsychology: Psychology in the service of life. Albany: SUNY Press.
19.
FolkeC.BiggsR.NorströmA. V.ReyersB.RockströmJ. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 41. doi:10.5751/ES-08748-210341
20.
Garavito-BermúdezD.LundholmC. (2017). Exploring interconnections between local ecological knowledge, professional identity and sense of place among Swedish fishers. Environmental Education Research, 23, 627-655.
21.
HathawayM. D. (2016). Agroecology and permaculture: Addressing key ecological problems by rethinking and redesigning agricultural systems. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6, 239-250.
22.
HeikkurinenP.RinkinenJ.JärvensivuT.KristofferW.RuuskaT. (2016). Organising in the Anthropocene: An ontological outline for ecocentric theorising. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 705-714.
23.
HoffmanA. J.SandelandsL. E. (2005). Getting right with nature: Anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, and theocentrism. Organization & Environment, 18, 141-162.
24.
HolmgrenD. (2003). Permaculture: Principles and pathways to sustainability. Hepburn, Victoria, Australia: Holmgren Design Services.
25.
HultmanM.BonnedahlK. J.O’NeillK. J. (2016). Unsustainable societies—sustainable businesses? Introduction to special issue of small enterprise research on transitional Ecopreneurs. Small Enterprise Research, 23(1), 1-9.
26.
IngoldT. (2000). The perception of the environment essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
JonesC. G.LawronJ. H.ShachakM. (1997). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology, 78, 1946-1957.
28.
KatzE. (1992). The big lie: Human restoration of nature. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12, 231-241.
29.
KorhonenJ.SeagerT. P. (2008). Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 411-419. doi:10.1002/bse.635
30.
KremenC.IlesA.BaconC. (2012). Diversified farming systems an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 44. doi:10.5751/ES-05103-170444
31.
McKeeverE.JackS.AndersonA. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 50-65.
32.
MilneM. J.GrayR. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13-29.
33.
MuñozP.CohenB. (2017). Towards a social-ecological understanding of sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 1-8.
34.
MuñozP.CohenB. (2018a). Entrepreneurial narratives in sustainable venturing: Beyond People, profit, and planet. Journal of Small Business Management, 56, 154-176.
35.
MuñozP.CohenB. (2018b). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 322, 300-322.
36.
O’NeillK.GibbsD. (2016). Rethinking green entrepreneurship - Fluid narratives of the green economy. Environment and Planning A, 48, 1727-1749.
37.
PoldnerK.ShrivastavaP.BranzeiO. (2017). Embodied multi-discursivity: An aesthetic process approach to sustainable entrepreneurship. Business and Society, 56, 214-252.
38.
Puig de la BellacasaM. (2010). Ethical doings in naturecultures. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13, 151-169.
39.
PurserR. E.ParkC.MontuoriA. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1053-1089.
SchaeferK.CornerP. D.KearinsK. (2015). Social, environmental and sustainable entrepreneurship research: What is needed for sustainability-as-flourishing?Organization & Environment, 28, 394-413.
42.
ShepherdD. A.PatzeltH. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 137-163.
43.
ShrivastavaP.KennellyJ. J. (2013). Sustainability and place-based enterprise. Organization & Environment, 26, 83-101.
44.
SogaM.GastonK. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 94-101.
45.
SonensheinS.DecellesK. A.DuttonJ. E. (2014). It’s not easy being green: The role of self-evaluations in explaining support of environmental issues. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 7-37.
46.
StålH. I.BonnedahlK. J. (2016). Conceptualizing strong sustainable entrepreneurship. Small Enterprise Research, 23, 73-84.
47.
SteffenW.BroadgateW.DeutschL.GaffneyO.LudwigC. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81-98.
48.
SteyaertC. (2007). “Entrepreneuring” as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 453-477.
WahlD. C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Axminster, England: Triarchy Press.
51.
WatsonT. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of “how things work” in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 202-217.
