In this article, we explore organising narratives that underpin the generation of effective ecological solutions. We examine the processes of meaning construction in relation to the development of sustainable land management practices in the Landcare organisation in Australia. Meaning construction is situated in a variety of contexts that are themselves strongly influenced by a meta-narrative, which Taylor has labelled the “modern social imaginary”: A shared system of meanings that captures the imaginations of individuals and shapes their social groupings and society. The shift in meaning construction is reflected in the emergence of a narrative of “ecological repair” that involved a process of learning and knowledge development we have labelled protracted sense-making. Our research findings have led us to conclude that the development of successful ecological solutions require an active rewriting of the social imaginary.
BatesonG. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
6.
BatesonG. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
7.
BealeB.FrayP. (1990). The vanishing continent: Australia’s degraded environment. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Hodder & Stoughton.
8.
BennS.BakerE. (2009). Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Change Management, 9, 383-397.
9.
BennS.OnyxJ. (2003). Negotiating interorganizational domains: The politics of social, natural and symbolic capital. In DaleA.OnyxJ. (Eds.), Social capital and sustainability in local communities: What is the link? (pp. 87-104). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
10.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.
11.
BerryG. R. (2001). Telling stories. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 58-73.
12.
BojeD. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational research. London, England: Sage.
BojeD.OswickC.FordJ. D. (2004). Language and organization. Academy of Management Review, 29, 571-577.
15.
BorgattiS. P.FosterP. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013.
16.
BoyceM. E. (1996). Organizational story and storytelling. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(5), 5-26.
17.
BrunerJ. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.
18.
BuchananD.DawsonP. (2007). Discourse and audience: Organizational change as multi-story process. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 669-686.
19.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In LawJ. (Eds.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 168-223). London, England: Routledge.
20.
CallonM.LatourB. (1992). Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school. A reply to Collins and Yearley. In PickeringA. (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343-368). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CastoriardisC. (1987). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
22.
CastreeN. (2001). Socializing nature: Theory, practice and politics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
ClandininD. J.HuberJ. (2010). Narrative inquiry. In PetersonP.BakerE.McGawB. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
25.
ClandininD. J.RosiekJ. (2007). Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderlands, spaces and tensions. In ClandininD. J. (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 35-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
CraneA. (2000). Corporate greening as amoralisation. Organization Studies, 21, 673-696.
27.
CunliffeA. L.LuhmanJ. T.BojeD. M. (2004). Narrative temporality: Implications for organizational research. Organization Studies, 25, 261-286.
28.
CzarniawskaB. (2004). Narratives in social science research. London, England: Sage.
29.
DervinB.Foreman-WernetL.LauterbachE. (2003). Sense-making methodology: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30.
DryzekJ. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
FeldmanM. S.KhademianA. M.IngramH.SchneiderA. S. (2006). Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices. Public Administration Review, 66, 89-99.
32.
FordC. M. (2002). The futurity of decision as a facilitator of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 635-646.
33.
GarudR.DunbarR.BartelC. (2011). Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organization Science, 22, 587-601.
34.
GillP. B. (2001). Narrative inquiry: Designing processes, pathways and patterns of change. Systems Research and Behaviour Science, 18, 335-344.
35.
GrantD.IedemaR. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of organizations. Text, 25(1), 37-66.
36.
GreyC. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations. London, England: Sage.
37.
HardyC.CleggS. (1997). Relativity without relativism: Reflexivity in post-paradigm organization studies. British Journal of Management, 8, S5-S17.
38.
HardyC.LawrenceT. B.PhillipsN. (1998). Talk and action: conversations and narrative in interorganizational collaboration. In GrantD.KeenoyT.OswickC. (Eds.), Discourse and organization (pp. 65-83). London, England: Sage.
39.
HarperK. (2001). Environment as master narrative: Discourse and identity in environmental conflicts (Special Issue Introduction). Anthropological Quarterly, 74, 101-103.
40.
HarrisL. C.CraneA. (2002). The greening of organizational culture: Management views on the depth, degree and diffusion of change. Journal of Change Management, 15, 214-233.
41.
HoffmanA. J.BazermanM. H. (2007). Changing practice on sustainability: Understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action. In SharmaS.StarikM.HustedB. (Eds.), Organizations and the sustainability mosaic (pp. 84-105). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
42.
JermierJ.ForbesL.BennS.OrsatoR. (2006). The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. In CleggS.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational studies (pp. 618-650). London, England: Sage.
43.
KearinsK.CollinsE.TregidgaH. (2010). Beyond corporate environmental management to a consideration of nature in visionary small enterprise. Business & Society, 49, 512-547.
44.
KimD. H. (2004). The link between individual and organizational learning. In StarkeyK.TempestS.McKinlayA. (Eds.), How organizations learn managing the search for knowledge (pp. 29-50). London, England: Thomson.
45.
KingN. (1998). Template analysis. In SymonG.CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
KuhnL.WoogR.HodgsonM. (2003). Applying complexity principles to enhance organizational knowledge management. In DelenerN.ChaoC.-N (Eds.), Challenging the frontiers in global business and technology: Implementation of changes in values, strategy and policy (pp. 154-162). New York, NY: Global Business and Technology Association.
47.
LinesW. J. (1991). Taming of the great South Land: A history of the conquest of nature in Australia. Sydney, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
48.
LinnenlueckeM. K.GriffithsA. (2009). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45, 357-366. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006
49.
LiveseyS. M. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar and Nigeria. Journal of Business Communications, 38, 58-91.
50.
LuhmanJ. T. (2005). Narrative processes in organizational discourse. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 7(3-4), 15-22.
51.
MeyfroidtP. (2013). Environmental cognitions, land change, and social-ecological feedbacks: An overview. Journal of Land Use Science, 8, 341-367.
NewtonT. (2002). Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review, 27, 523-540.
55.
NewtonT. (2005). Practical idealism: An oxymoron?Journal of Management Studies, 42, 869-884.
56.
NonakaI. (2004). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. In StarkeyK.TempestS.McKinleyA. (Eds.), How organizations learn: Managing the search for knowledge (pp. 165-201). London, England: Thompson Learning.
57.
OnyxJ. A.BullenP. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 23-42.
58.
OrrJ. E. (2006). Ten years of talking about machines. Organization Studies, 27, 1805-1820.
59.
PackalenS. (2010). Culture and sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 118-121.
60.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61.
PowellJ. M. (1976). Environmental management in Australia 1788-1914: Guardians, improvers and profit: An introductory survey. Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
62.
PreussL.DawsonD. (2009). ‘On the quality and legitimacy of Green Narratives in business: A framework for evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 135-149.
63.
RhodesC.BrownA. D. (2005). Narrative, organizations and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 167-188.
SmithP. A. C. (2011). Elements of organizational sustainability. Learning Organization, 18(1), 5-9.
66.
SoperK. (2009). Unnatural times? The social imaginary and the future of nature. Sociological Review, 57, 222-235.
67.
StarikM. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 207-217.
68.
StarkeyK.CraneA.2003. Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28, 220-237.
69.
SveibyK.SkuthorpeT. (2006). Treading lightly the hidden wisdom of the world’s oldest people. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
70.
TaylorC. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. London, England: Duke University Press.
71.
TsoukasH.HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979-1013.
72.
TsoukasH.VladimirouE. (2004). What is organizational knowledge? In StarkeyK.TempestS.McKinlayA. (Eds.), How organizations learn managing the search for knowledge (pp. 363-384). London, England: Thomson.
United Nations Global Compact. (2013). Global corporate sustainability report. New York, NY: Author.
75.
WalkerH.BrammerS. (2009). ‘Sustainable procurement in the United Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14, 128-137.
76.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
77.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
WeickK. E. (2010). Reflections on enacted sensemaking in the Bhopal disaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 537-550.
79.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
WrightC.NybergD.De CockC.WhitemanG. (2013). Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization, 20, 647-658.
83.
WynneB. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In LashS.SzerszynskiB.WynneB. (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity (pp. 44-83). London, England: Sage.
84.
YoulR.MarriottS.NabbenT. (2006). Landcare in Australia founded on local action. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: SILC and Rob Youl Consulting Pty Ltd.
