We begin with a critique of the ontological underpinnings of the mainstream business model literature with its origins in design-science and offer instead insights from sociology and organisational institutionalism to argue for a more accurate representation of actual processes of organisational transformation, especially necessary where scholarship is concerned to address societal mission-oriented normative cares beyond the objectives of efficiency and profit maximisation. We propose the foundations of a new theoretical construct: the Normative Business Model (NBM) distinguishing deep institutionalisation as the embedding of values (normative orientations) into the design, practices and identity of organisations. The NBM comprises four cornerstones: (a) normativity, (b) (de)institutionalisation and deep institutionalisation processes, (c) institutional entrepreneurialism and (d) economic and financial governance. A case overview of Arizona State University is used to highlight that the NBM refers to the full range and variety of organisation types, not exclusively businesses.
ArcherM. S. (1998). Social theory and the analysis of society. Sociologie et Sociétés, 30, 9-22.
2.
ArcherM. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArcherM. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArcherM. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BakerM.SchalteggerS. (2015). Pragmatism and new directions in social and environmental accountability research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 263-294.
6.
BarleyS. R.TolbertP. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93-117.
7.
BarnettJ. H. (1985). A business model of enlightenment. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 57-63.
8.
BoiralO. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth?Organization Science, 18, 127-146.
9.
BoonsF.Lüdeke-FreundF. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps toward a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9-19.
10.
BourdieuP. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BoydB.HenningN.ReynaE.WangD. E.WelchM. D. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
12.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
13.
BreuerH.Lüdeke-FreundF. (2014, June). Normative innovation for sustainable business models in value networks. In HuizinghK.ConnS.TorkkeliM.BitranI. (Eds.), The Proceedings of XXV ISPIM Conference—Innovation for Sustainable Economy and Society; Dublin, Ireland.
14.
CallonM. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In LawJ. (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London, England: Routledge.
15.
CallonM.LatourB. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In CetinaK. K.CicourelA. V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro-sociologies (pp. 277-303). London, England: Routledge.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TreviñoL. K. (2013). Political Ideologies of CEOs The Influence of Executives’ Values on Corporate Social Responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197-232.
18.
CrowM. (2011). A new American reader: Selected writings on university design and related topics. Phoenix: Arizona State University.
19.
DacinM. T.DacinP. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 327-352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
DarbyL.JenkinsH. (2006). Applying sustainability indicators to the social enterprise business model: The development and application of an indicator set for Newport Wastesavers, Wales. International Journal of Social Economics, 33, 411-431.
21.
DavisG. F.AndersonP. J. (2008). Social movements and failed institutionalization: Corporate (non) response to the AIDS epidemic. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 371-388). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
DeephouseD. L.SuchmanM. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
DiMaggioP. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In ZuckerL. G. (ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations. Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24.
DoganovaL.Eyquem-RenaultM. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38, 1559-1570.
25.
EdlerJ.JamesA. (2015). Understanding the emergence of new science and technology policies: Policy entrepreneurship, agenda setting and the development of the European Framework Programme. Research Policy, 44, 1252-1265.
26.
FissP. C. (2008). Institutions and corporate governance. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 389-410). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
GarudR.HardyC.MaguireS. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28, 957-969.
28.
GerringJ.YesnowitzJ. (2006). A normative turn in political science?Polity, 38, 101-133.
29.
GlaserB.StraussA. (2012). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction. (Original published in 1967)
30.
GrasslW. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity. ACRN Journal of Social Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 37-60.
31.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
HardyC.MaguireS. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
HenriksenK.BjerreM.ØsterJ.BisgaardT. (2012). Green business model innovation: Policy report. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Innovation.
34.
HonnethA. (2007). Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
35.
KokkelerB. J. (2014). Distributed academic leadership in emergent research organisations. Enschede, Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.
36.
LaaschO.ConawayR. N. (2015). Principles of responsible management: Glocal sustainability, responsibility, ethics. Mason, OH: Cengage.
37.
LaaschO.DierksmeierC.PirsonM.Von KimakowitzE. (2014). Reality proves possibility: Developing humanistic business models from paradigmatic practice. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Humanistic Management Network.
38.
LawrenceT. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT.NordW. R. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MacKenzieD. A.MuniesaF.SiuL. (2007). Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657-679.
42.
MeléD. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 77-88.
43.
MüllerS. (2012). Business models in social entrepreneurship. In VolkmannC. K.TokarskiK. O.ErnstK. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship and social business: An Introduction and discussion with case studies (pp. 105-131). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
44.
MutchA. (2007). Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration. Organization Studies, 28, 1123-1140.
45.
OliverC. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563-588.
46.
OsterwalderA. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne.
47.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY. (2002, June). An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. Paper presented at the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia.
48.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers [Kindle edition]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
49.
OsterwalderA.PigneurY.BernardaG.SmithA.PapadakosT. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want. Chichester, England: Wiley.
PirsonM. A. (2012). Business models and social entrepreneurship. In BakerH. K.NofsingerJ. R. (Eds.), Socially responsible finance and investing: Financial institutions, corporations, investors, and activists (pp. 55-68). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
52.
PirsonM. A.LawrenceP. R. (2010). Humanism in business—Towards a paradigm shift?Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 553-565.
53.
RandlesS. (2008). Industrial ecology in Europe: From nano-ethicswash to real-time regulation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12, 270-274.
54.
RandlesS. (2015, April). Managing publicness in the “Good University”: What does it entail and how does one accomplish it?Paper presented at the conference “Institutional Design Frontiers Summit: Futures of Higher Education,”Scottsdale, AZ.
55.
RandlesS.Dorbeck-JungB.LindnerR.RipA. (2014). Report of the roundtable at S.NET Boston 2013: Where to next for responsible innovation? In CoenenC. (Ed.), Innovation and responsibility. Engaging with new and emerging technologies (pp. 19-37). Berlin, Germany: AKA Publishing.
56.
RandlesS.GeeS.EdlerJ. (2015). Governance and the institutionalisation of responsible research and innovation in Europe: Transversal lessons from an extensive programme of case studies (Stakeholder report). Retrieved from http://res-agora.eu/assets/ResAGORA-lessons-Stakeholder-Report_final.pdf
57.
RascheA.GilbertD. U. (2015). Decoupling responsible management education: Why business schoolsmaynot walk their talk. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(3), 1-14.
58.
RipA. (2010). De facto governance of nanotechnologies. In GoodwinM.KoopsB.-J.LeensR. (Eds.), Dimensions of technology regulation (pp. 285-308). Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf.
59.
SahlinK.WedlinL. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
SayerA. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SchatzkiT. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SchatzkiT. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical exploration of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
63.
SchröderT. (2013). Sustainability in practice: A study of how reflexive agents negotiate multiple domains of consumption, enact change and articulate visions of the “good life” (Doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK.
64.
ScottW. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SebastianiR.MontagniniF.DalliD. (2012). Ethical consumption and new business models in the food industry: Evidence from the Eataly case. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 473-488.
66.
SeelosC.MairJ. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48, 241-246.
67.
ShelleyL. (2003). Trafficking in women: The business model approach. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10, 119-131.
68.
SlackK. (2012). Mission impossible? Adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive industries in developing countries. Resources Policy, 37, 179-184.
69.
SommerA. (2011). Managing green business model innovation. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
70.
StubbsW.CocklinC. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model.”Organization & Environment, 21, 103-127.
71.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99-129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
TsvetkovaA.GustafssonM. (2012). Business models for industrial ecosystems: A modular approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 29-30, 246-254.
73.
UrquhartC. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
VaaraE.WhittingtonR. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 285-336.
75.
Von KimakowitzE.PirsonM.SpitzeckH.DierksmeierC.AmannW. (2011). Humanistic management in practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
WeikE. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 466-481.
77.
WhittingtonR. (1993). What is strategy—And does it matter?London, England: Routledge.
78.
WhittingtonR. (2007). Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye. Organization Studies, 28, 1575-1586.
79.
WirtzB. W. (2010). Business model management. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
80.
YunusM.MoingeonB.Lehmann-OrtegaL. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43, 308-325.
81.
ZilberT. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
