Organizing for sustainability seeks systems change at a global level. This objective is captured in the phrase “Think global, act local”; the assumption is that global change will happen through summative local action. This article argues that local action will not necessarily produce systems change and that a new scale-independent categorization for interacting with systems is needed. I introduce the concept of fractal as a useful tool for engaging with problems of scale in organizational settings and argue that change for sustainability needs to be framed as a fractal narrative in order to facilitate implementation success.
AguileraR. V.RuppD. E.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S Back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836-863.
2.
BarryD.ElmesM. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22, 429-452.
3.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New Delhi, India: Sage.
BojeD. M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land.”Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1036.
6.
BojeD. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. London, England: Sage.
7.
BojeD. M.OswickC.FordJ. D. (2004). Language and organization: The doing of discourse. Academy of Management Review, 29, 571-577.
8.
BrownA. D. (2006). A narrative approach to collective identities. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 731-753.
9.
ChettiparambA. (2014). Complexity theory and planning: Examining “fractals” for organising policy domains in planning practice. Planning Theory, 13, 5-25.
10.
CollinsE. M.KearinsK. (2010). Delivering on sustainability’s global and local orientation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 499-506.
11.
CunliffeA. L.LuhmanJ. T.BojeD. M. (2004). Narrative temporality: Implications for organizational research. Organization Studies, 25, 261-286.
12.
CzarniawskaB. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DeLandaM. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York, NY: Continuum.
14.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). London, England: Athlone Press. (Original work published 1980)
15.
DoppeltB. (2008). The power of sustainable thinking: How to create a positive future for the climate, the planet, your organization and your life. London, England: Earthscan.
16.
GrantD.IedemaR. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of organizations. Text, 25, 37-66.
17.
HansenH. (2006). The Ethnonarrative Approach. Human Relations, 59, 1049-1075.
18.
HardyC.PalmerI.PhillipsN. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53, 1227-1248.
19.
HarperK. (2001). Introduction: The environment as master narrative: Discourse and identity in environmental problems. Anthropological Quarterly, 74(3), 101-103.
20.
IsonR. (2010). Systems practice: How to act in a climate change world. London, England: Springer.
21.
JenningsP. D.ZandbergenP. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 908-935.
22.
KuhnL.WoogR. (2006, December). Updating inquiry techniques: From dialogos and hermeneutikos to fractal and attractor narrative analysis. Paper presented at the Australian Consortium for Social and Political Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
23.
LatoucheS. (2010). Farewell to growth. Cambridge, England: Polity.
24.
LawJ. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
MandelbrotB. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
26.
MandelbrotB. B. (2006). Fractal analysis and synthesis of fracture surface roughness and related forms of complexity and disorder. International Journal of Fracture, 138, 13-17.
27.
MontielI. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21(3), 245-269.
28.
NorthP. (2010). Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change: A sympathetic review. Geoforum, 41, 585-594.
29.
PhillipsN. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16, 625-649.
30.
RobertsonR. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In FeatherstoneM.LashS.RobertsonR. (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25-68). London, England: Sage.
31.
SlicerD. (2003). Introduction. Ethics & the Environment, 8(2), 1-7.
32.
StarikM.RandsG. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 908-935.
33.
SteadJ. G.SteadW. E. (2013). The coevolution of sustainable strategic management in the global marketplace. Organization & Environment, 26(2), 162-183.
34.
StoddartM.TindallD. B.GreenfieldK. L. (2012). “Governments have the power?” Interpretations of climate change responsibility and solutions among Canadian environmentalists. Organization & Environment, 25(1), 39-58.
TregidgaH.KearinsK.MilneM. (2013). The politics of knowing “organizational sustainable development.”Organization & Environment, 26, 102-129.
37.
TsoukasH.HatchM. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations, 54, 979-1013.
38.
WaddockS. (2014).Wisdom and responsible leadership: Aesthetic sensibility, moral imagination, and systems thinking. In KoehnD.ElmD. (Eds.), Aesthetics and business ethics (pp. 129-147). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.
39.
WhitemanG. (2004). Why are we talking inside? Reflecting on traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13, 261-277.
40.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
