As part of the European Union’s (EU) renewable energy and climate targets and its drive for sustainability, energy efficiency, and environmental protection, various elements of the defense sector in Europe are undertaking their own green initiatives. This is particularly important as the defense sector is one of the biggest public consumers of energy in the EU. This article asks to what extent, how, and why elements of the defense sector in Europe have engaged in greening. By examining four categories in a relevant typology of greening—ceremonial greening, holistic greening, regulatory greening, and competitive greening—this article argues that the defense sector in Europe is far from being a holistic green actor. Rather, Europe’s militaries, defense institutions, and defense firms exhibit a strong sense of self-interest in greening—embodied in defense market competition and regulation—and tend toward delegating green innovation to the market within an increasingly regulated context.
Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Ortiz-de-MandojanaN. (2013). Green innovation and financial performance: An institutional approach. Organization & Environment, 26, 365-385.
2.
BagaeenS. G. (2006). Redeveloping former military sites: Competitiveness, urban sustainability and public participation. Cities, 23, 339-352.
3.
BönigkN.DannemannB. (2010). Solar park—Opportunities for biodiversity: A report on biodiversity in and around ground-mounted photovoltaic plants. Berlin: German Renewable Energies Agency.
4.
BrownL. (2012). Full planet, empty plates: The new geopolitics of food security. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
5.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
6.
CoatesP.ColeT.DudleyM.PearsonC. (2011). Defending nation, defending nature? Militarized landscapes and military environmentalism in Britain, France and the United States. Environmental History, 16, 456-491.
7.
CoulsonM. (1995). The geography of defence: Developing themes of study. GeoJournal, 36, 371-382.
8.
DryzekJ. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
DurantR. F. (2007). The greening of the U.S. military: Environmental policy, national security, and organizational change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10.
European Commission. (2011). A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050: Communications: COM (2011) 112 (Final).
European Commission. (2013a). Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector: A new deal for European defence: COM (2013) 542 (Final).
13.
European Commission. (2013b). General report on REACH. February5, 2013, COM (2013) 49 (Final).
European Defence Agency. (2012c). Specifications for the request to participate in the competitive dialogue (Phase 1): Competitive dialogue EU armed forces go green (No: 12.ARM.CD.01).
17.
European Union. (2012). Military concept on environmental protection and energy efficiency for EU-led military operations (CSDP/PSDC 549 COSDP 762 13758/12).
18.
FleckD. (2013). The protection of the environment in armed conflict: Legal obligations in the absence of specific rules. Nordic Journal of International Law, 82, 7-20.
19.
ForbesL. C.JermierJ. M. (2010). The new corporate environmentalism and the ecology of commerce. Organization & Environment, 23, 465-481.
20.
GoodinR. E. (1992). Green political theory. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
HajerM. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23.
HalmeM. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1087-1109.
24.
HamdouchA.DepretM.-H. (2010). Policy integration strategy and the development of the green economy: Foundations and implementation patterns. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53, 473-490.
25.
HarrisL. C.CraneA. (2002). The greening of organizational culture: Management views on the depth, degree and diffusion of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 214-234.
26.
HorvathG.BlahoM.EgriA.KriskaG.SeresI.RobertsonB. (2010). Reducing the maladaptive attractiveness of solar panels to polarotactic insects. Conservation Biology, 24, 1644-1653.
27.
HuberJ. (1982). The lost innocence of ecology: New technologies under superindustrial development.Frankfurt am main, Germany: Fisher Verlag.
28.
Hughes ButtsK. (1994). Why the military is good for the environment. In KäkönenJ. (Ed.), Green security or militarized environment (pp. 83-110). Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
29.
JänickeM. (2008). Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 557-565.
30.
JermierJ. M.ForbesL. C. (2003). Greening organizations: Critical issues. In AlvessonM.WillmottH. (Eds.), Studying management critically (pp. 157-176). London, England: Sage.
31.
LawrenceA.MorellD. (1995). Leading-edge environmental management: Motivation, opportunity, resources and processes. In CollinsD.StarikM. (Eds), Research in corporate social performance and policy—sustaining the natural environment: Empirical studies on the interface between nature and organizations (pp. 99-126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32.
LelongG. (2012). Sustainable development, defence and the EU law making process. In European Defence Agency, Military Green 2012: Conference-exhibition-demonstration programme. Brussels.
OrssattoR. J.CleggS. R. (1999). The political ecology of organizations: Toward a framework for analyzing business-environment relationships. Organization & Environment, 12, 263-279.
38.
PiragesD. C. (1991). The greening of peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 28, 129-133.
39.
PotoskiM.PrakashA. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745-769.
40.
PrakashA. (2000). Greening the firm: The politics of corporate environmentalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
RamosT. B.MeloJ. (2005). Environmental management practices in the defence sector: Assessment of the Portuguese military’s environmental profile. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1117-1130.
43.
ReardonS. (2012). Eco-warriors: US military pushes for green energy. New Scientist, 216(2889), 6-8.
SandströmJ. (2004). Greening the Swedish defence material administration: A case study on the force of industry in environmental policy-making. European Environment, 14, 356-367.
46.
ScottR. W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
47.
SpaargarenG. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 687-701.
48.
SpaargarenG.MolA. P. J. (1992). Sociology, environment and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources, 5, 323-344.
49.
StarikM.KanashiroP. (2013). Toward a theory of sustainability management: Uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization & Environment, 26, 7-30.
WackernagelM.OnistoL.BelloP.Linares CallejasA.Lopez FalfanI.Jesus Mendez GarciaJ. . . . Suarez GuerreroG. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29, 375-390.
56.
WinnM. I.PogutzS. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26, 203-229.
57.
WoodwardR. (1999). Gunning for rural England: The politics of the promotion of military land use in the Northumberland national park. Journal of Rural Studies, 15, 17-33.
58.
WoodwardR. (2001). Khaki conservation: An examination of military environmentalist discourse in the British army. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 201-217.
59.
ZolloM.CennamoC.NeumannK. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment, 26, 241-259.
