Global warming is the most serious environmental problem of our time and a major issue of environmental justice. Yet meager public response in the form of social movement activity, behavioral changes, or public pressure on governments is noteworthy in all Western nations. Existing research emphasizes lack of information as a limiting factor for failed public response. This explanation cannot account for the significant population who know about and express concern for global warming. Ethnographic and interview data from a rural Norwegian community indicate that nonresponse is at least partially a matter of socially organized denial. Because Norwegian economic prosperity is tied to oil production, collectively ignoring climate change maintains Norwegian economic interests. Most environmental justice research focuses on people facing disproportionate exposure to environmental problems. This project examines wealthy citizens who perpetuate global warming as they turn a blind eye. Environmental justice implications of socially organized denial are discussed for global warming and beyond.
Agarwal, A., & Narain, S. (1991).Global warming in an unequal world: A case of environmental colonialism. New Delhi, India: Centre for Science and Environment.
2.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
3.
Athanasiou, T., & Baer, P. (2002). Dead heat: Global justice and global warming. New York: Seven Stories Press.
4.
Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
Baer, P., Harte, J., Haya, B., Herzog, A., Holdern, J., Hultman, N., et al. (2000). Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science,289(29), 22-87.
6.
Barstad, A., & Hellevik, O. (2004). På vei mot det gode samfunn? Om forholdet mellom ønsket og faktisk samfunnsutvikling [On our way to the good society? On the relationship between desired and actual social evolution]. Statistiske Analyser,64. Available at http://www.ssb.no/emner/00/02/sa64/
7.
Beamish, T. D. (2001). Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal: Lay-public perceptions of risk in the San Luis Obispo County oil spill. Organization & Environment, 14(1), 5-33.
8.
Beamish, T. D. (2002). Silent spill: The organization of an industrial crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Beck, U. (1992). The risk society.London: Sage.
10.
Bell, A. (1994). Climate of opinion: public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse and Society,5(1), 33-64.
11.
Bord, R., Fisher, A., & O'Connor, R. (1998). Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research, 11(1), 75-84.
12.
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? I mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970.
13.
Brechin, S. (2003). Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: The U.S. versus the world?International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,23(10), 106-134.
14.
Bulkeley, H. (2000). Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 313-333.
15.
Centre for Science and Environment. (1998). CSE fact sheet #4: Flexible mechanisms: Can you sell what is not yours?New Delhi, India: Author.
16.
Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
18.
Dispensa, J. M., & Brulle, R. J. (2003). Media's social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming—A comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,23(10), 74-105.
19.
Donohoe, M. (2003). Causes and health consequences of environmental degradation and social injustice. Social Science and Medicine,56(3), 573-587.
20.
Dunlap, R. (1998). Lay perceptions for global risk: Public views of global warming in cross national context. International Sociology, 13(4), 473-498.
21.
Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Eriksen, T. H. (1993). Being Norwegian in a shrinking world. In A. C. Kiel (Ed.), Continuity and change: Aspects of contemporary Norway (pp. 11-38). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavia University Press.
23.
Geckas, V., & Burke, P. (1995). Self and identity. In K. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 41–67). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
Gelbspan, R. (1997). The heat is on: The high stakes battle over Earth's threatened climate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
Gelbspan, R. (2004). Boiling point: How politicians, big oil and coal, journalists, and activists are fueling the climate crisis—and what we can do to avert disaster. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Gelbspan, R. (2005). Global warming and political power: The end of nature and beyond. Organization & Environment,18(2), 186-192.
27.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden, NY: Doubleday.
29.
Guha, R. (2002). How much should a person consume?Global Dialogue,4(1), 49-62.
30.
Halford, G., & Sheehan, P. (1991). Human responses to environmental changes. International Journal of Psychology,26(5), 599-611.
31.
Hellevik, O. (2002). Beliefs, attitudes and behavior towards the environment. In W. Lafferty, M. Nordskog, & H. A. Aakre (Eds.),Realizing Rio in Norway: Evaluative studies of sustainable development (pp. 7-19). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Program for Research and Documentation for a Sustainable Society.
32.
Hellevik, O., & Høie, H. (1999). Vi bekymrer oss mindre for miljøet [We worry ourselves less about the environment]. Samfunnsspeilet, 13(4), 53-61.
33.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Hovden, E., & Lindseth, G. (2002). Norwegian climate policy 1989-2002. In W. Lafferty, M. Nordskog, & H. A. Aakre (Eds.),Realizing Rio in Norway: Evaluative studies of sustainable development (pp. 143-168). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Program for Research and Documentation for a Sustainable Society.
36.
Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard, R. B. (1990). Intergenerational resource rights, efficiency, and social optimality. Land Economics,66(1), 1-11.
37.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press for the IPCC.
38.
Johansen, B. (2002). The global warming desk reference.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Lifton, R. J. (1982). Indefensible weapons. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Luke, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillian.
42.
Luke, T. (2005). Collective action and the eco subpolitical. Organization & Environment, 18(2), 202-206.
43.
McCright, A., & Dunlap, R. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522.
44.
McCright, A., & Dunlap, R. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348-373.
45.
McKibben, B. (1989). The end of nature. New York: Random House.
46.
McKibben, B. (2005). The emotional core of the end of nature. Organization & Environment, 18(2), 182-185.
47.
Meijnders, A., Midden, C., & Wilke, H. (2001). Communications about environmental risks and risk-reducing behavior: The impact of fear on information processing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,31(4), 754-777.
48.
Nilsen, A. (1999). Where is the future? Time and space as categories in analyses of young people's images of the future. Innovation,12(2), 175-194.
49.
Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “People want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial and social movement non-participation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3), 372-396.
50.
Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. (2002). Environment 2002. The Norwegian petroleum sector, fact sheet. Oslo, Norway: Author.
51.
O'Connor, R. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 1-17.
52.
Opotow, S., & Weiss, L. (2000). Denial and the process of moral exclusion in environmental conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 475-490.
53.
Pettit, J. (2004). Climate justice: A new social movement for atmospheric rights. IDS Bulletin, 35(3), 102-106.
54.
Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? II survey studies of educated lay people. Risk Analysis, 14, 971-982.
55.
Roberts, J. T. (2001). Global inequality and climate change. Society and Natural Resources,14(6), 501-509.
56.
Rosa, E. (2001). Global climate change: Background and sociological contributions. Society and Natural Resources, 14(6), 491-499.
57.
Rosenberg, M. (1991). Self-processes and emotional experiences. In J. Howard & P. Callero (Eds.),The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 123-142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Saad, L. (2002, March 25). Americans sharply divided on seriousness of global warming: Only one third consider the problem grave. Gallup Poll. Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://poll.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=5509&pg=1
59.
Skogen, K. (1993). Risiko i et trygghetssamfunn. En hverdagshistorie fra Trysil [Risk in a safe society. An everyday history from Trysil]. Sosiologisk Tidskriff, 9(3), 221-223.
60.
Slovic, P. (Ed.). (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
61.
Smith, D. E. (1979). A sociology for women. In J. A. Sherman & E. T. Black (Eds.),The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 135–187). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
62.
Stastisk Sentrabyrå (SSB). (2002). Natural resources and the environment. Norwegian Statistics Bureau. Available at www.ssb.no
63.
Stern, P. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.
64.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in socialpsychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27(6), 723-743.
65.
U.N. Development Program.(2005). Human development report. Available at http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/pdf/HDR05_HDI.pdf
66.
Ungar, S. (1992). The rise and (relative) decline of global warming as a social problem. Sociological Quarterly,33(4), 483-501.
67.
Watson, R. T., Zinowera, M. C., & Moss, R. H. (Eds.). (1998). The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
Zerubavel, E. (2002). The elephant in the room: Notes on the social organization of denial. In K. Cerulo (Ed.),Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition(pp. 21-27). New York: Routledge.
70.
Zerubavel, E. (2006). The elephant in the room: Silence and denial in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.
