The author examines various cases of conservation policies in practice, and the implication of those practices in terms of the ecologies they support, showing, in the end, that the “nature” being preserved is not always the one intended. In doing this, insights are also gleaned to inform how we should do environmental sociology, and what lies in environmental sociology's future if we work toward this end. The author argues that environmental sociology needs to become more environmental: to be willing to understand sociobiophysical relationships in all their complexity, even in those cases that require a well-grounded understanding of ecosystem processes. Thus, although retaining focus on the historical subject, which shapes conceptions of and ultimately practices toward ecology, we must also begin to view this subject as also an ecological object. The implications of such an analytic move, in terms of what it means for environmental sociology's future, are then discussed.
Abekerli, S. (2001). A critique of development and conservation policies in environmental sensitive regions in Brazil. Geoforum, 32, 551-565.
2.
Adam, D. K., Ashton, I. W., Gorokhova, E., Kerkhoff, A. J., Liess, A., & Litchman, E. (2005). Toward a stoichiometric framework for evolutionary biology. Oikos, 109, 6-17.
3.
Bandy, J. (2004). Paradoxes of transnational civil societies under neoliberalism: The coalition for justice in the maquiladoras. Social Problems, 51, 410-431.
4.
Baskett, M. L., Levin, S. A., Gaines, S. D., & Dushoff, J. (2005). Marine reserve design and the evolution of size at maturation in harvested fish. Ecological Applications, 15, 882-901.
5.
Bell, M. M. (2004). An invitation to environmental sociology(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi, India: Pine Forge Press.
6.
Benton, T. (1991). Biology and social science. Sociology, 25, 1-29.
7.
Blaber, S. (2000). Tropical estuarine fishes: Ecology, exploitation and conservation. Oxford, UK, Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
8.
Blatter, J. (2004). From spaces of place to “spaces of flows”? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 530-548.
9.
Botkin, D. (1990). Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Brown, P., & Mikkelsen, E. J. (1990). No safe place: Toxic waste, leukemia, and community action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Carolan, M. (2005a). The disciplining of nature: The homogenizing and constraining forces of anti-markets on the food system. Environmental Values, 14, 121-136.
12.
Carolan, M. (2005b). Realism without reductionism: Toward an ecologically embedded sociology. Human Ecology Review, 12, 1-20.
13.
Carolan, M. (2005c). Society, biology, and ecology: Bringing nature back into sociology's disciplinary narrative through critical realism. Organization & Environment, 18, 393-421.
14.
Carolan, M. (in press). Science, expertise, and the democratization of the decision-making process. Society and Natural Resources.
15.
Catton, W. (1992). Separation versus unification in sociological human ecology. In L. Freese (Ed.),Advances in human ecology (pp. 65-99). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1978a). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
17.
Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1978b). Paradigms, theories, and the primacy of the HEP-NEP distinction. American Sociologist, 13, 256-259.
18.
Coltman, D. W., O'Donoghue, P., Jorgenson, J. T., Hogg, J. T., Strobeck, C., & Festa Blanchet, M. (2003). Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature, 426, 655-658.
19.
Conover, D. O., & Munch, S. B. (2002). Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science, 297, 94-96.
20.
Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Convention on biological diversity: Text and annexes. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
21.
Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness, or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.),Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (pp. 69-90). New York: Norton.
22.
Dickens, P. (2004). Society and nature: Changing our environment, changing ourselves. Malden, MA: Polity.
23.
Dunlap, R., & Catton, W. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. American Sociologist, 25, 5-30.
24.
Dunlap, R. (2002). Paradigms, theories, and environmental sociology. In R. Dunlap, F. H. Buttel, P. Dickens, & A. Gijswijt (Eds.),Sociological theory and the environment: Classical foundations, contemporary insights (pp. 329-350), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
Eder, K. (1996). The social construction of nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Fearnside, P. M. (2003). Conservation policy in Brazilian Amazonia: Understanding the dilemmas. World Development, 31, 757-779.
28.
Frankel, O. H., Brown, A. H., & Burdon, J. J. (1995). The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Frickel, S. (2004). Building an interdiscipline: Collective action framing and the rise of genetic toxicology. Social Problems, 51, 269-287.
30.
Goldman, M. (Ed.). (1998). Privatizing nature: Political struggles for the global commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
31.
Goldman, M., & Schurman, R. A. (2000). Closing the “great divide”: New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 563-584.
32.
Grove, R. (1995). Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical islands Edens and the origins of environmentalism, 1600-1860. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Guha, R. (1989). Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique. Environmental Ethics, 11, 71-83.
34.
Haila, Y. (1999). Biodiversity and the divide between culture and nature. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 165-181.
35.
Haila, Y. (2000). Beyond the nature-culture dualism. Biology and Philosophy, 15, 155-175.
36.
Haugen, T., & Vollestad, A. (2001). A century of life-history evolution in grayling. Genetica, 112-113(1), 475-491.
37.
Hawkes, J. G., Maxted, N., & Ford-Lloyd, B. V. (2000). The ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
38.
Heath, D. D., Heath, J. W., Bryden, C. A., Johnson, R. M., & Fox, C. W. (2003). Rapid evolution of egg size in captive salmon. Science, 299, 1738-1740.
39.
Heemskerk, M., Wilson, K., & Pavao-Zuckerman, M. (2003). Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines,Conservation Biology, 7,8-8.
40.
Holmes, B. (2005, July 9-15). In the blink of an eye. New Scientist, 28–31.
41.
Jachmann, H., Berry, P. S. M., & Imae, H. (1995). Tusklessness in African elephants— A future trend. African Journal of Ecology, 33, 230-235.
42.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisors as policy makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Jasanoff, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Science knowledge and decision making. In S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.),Human choice and climate change (pp. 1-112). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
45.
Jepson, D., & Canney, B. (2003). Values-led conservation,Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 271-274.
46.
Kinnison, M. T., Unwin, M. J., & Quinn, T. P. (2003). Migratory costs and contemporary evolution of reproductive allocation in male Chinook salmon. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 1257-1269.
47.
Kloppenburg, J., Jr., & Burrows, B. (1996). Biotechnology to the rescue? Twelve reasons why biotechnology is incompatible with sustainable agriculture. Ecologist, 26, 61-67.
48.
Krausman, P. R. (2000). An introduction to the restoration of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology, 8, 3-5.
49.
Lackey, R. (2001). Values, policy, and ecosystem health. Bio Science, 51, 437-443.
50.
Lamme, A. (1989). America's historic landscapes: Community power and the preservation of four national historic sites. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
51.
Lee, C. (1999). Rapid and repeated invasions of freshwater by the copepodEurytemora affinis. Evolution, 53, 1423-1434.
52.
Lele, S., & Norgaard, R. (2005). Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bio Science, 55, 967-975.
53.
Lewontin, R. (2000). The triple helix: Gene, organism, environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Lomborg, B. (2001). The skeptical environmentalist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Luke, T. W. (2005). The death of environmentalism or the advent of public ecology?Organization & Environment, 18, 489-494.
56.
Lumley, S., & Armstrong, R. (2004). Some of the nineteenth century origins of the sustainability concept. Environmental, Development, and Sustainability, 6, 367-378.
57.
Lynch, M., & O'Hely, M. (2001). Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conservation Genetics, 2, 363-378.
Marty, S. (2002, November/December). Sacrificial ram. Canadian Geographic, 37–50.
60.
Mason, M. (2004). Representing transnational environmental interests: New opportunities for non-governmental organization access within the World Trade Organization?Environmental Politics, 13, 566-589.
61.
McAfee, K. (2003). Neoliberalism on the molecular scale: Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum, 34, 203-219.
62.
Murphy, R. (1995). Sociology as if nature did not matter: An ecological critique. British Journal of Sociology, 46, 688-707.
63.
Murphy, R. (2001). Nature's temporalitities and the manufacture of vulnerability: A study of a sudden disaster with implicatoins for creeping ones. Time and Society, 10, 329-348.
64.
Noss, R. F. (2001). Beyond Kyoto: Forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conservation Biology, 15, 578-590.
65.
Olsen, E., Lilly, G. R., Heino, M., Morgan, M. J., Brattey, J., & Dieckmann, U. (2005). Assessing changes in age and size at maturation in collapsing populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 62, 811-823.
66.
Oreskes, N. (2004). Science and public policy: What's proof got to do with it?Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 369-383.
67.
Peluso, N. (1993). Coercing conservation?—The politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change, 3, 199-216.
68.
Peluso, N. (1996). Reserving value: Conserving ideology and state protection of resources, In M. Depuis & P. Vandergeest (Eds.),Creating the countryside: The politics of rural and environmental discourse (pp. 135-165). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
69.
Pielke, R. (2004). When scientists politicize science: Making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 405-417.
70.
Pielke, R. (2005). Misdefining “climate change”: Consequences for science and action. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 548-561.
71.
Pimentel, D. (2002) Exposition on skepticism. Bio Science, 52, 295-298.
72.
Pimm, S., & Harvey, J. (2001). No need to worry about the future. Nature, 414, 149-150.
73.
Pohl, C. (2005). Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research. Futures, 37, 1159-1178.
74.
Playfair, S. (2003). Vanishing species: Saving the fish, sacrificing the fisherman. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
75.
Rayner, S. (2003). Democracy in the age of assessment: Reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making. Science and Public Policy, 30, 163-170.
76.
Reiger, J. (2001). American sportsman and the origins of conservation. Corvallis: Oregon State University.
77.
Reznick, D. N., & Ghalambor, C. (2001). The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: What empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica, 112-113(1), 183-198.
78.
Reznick, D. N., & Ghalambor, C. (2005). Can commercial fishing cause evolution? Answers from guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 791-801.
79.
Robertson, D., & Hull, B. (2001). Beyond biology: Toward a more public ecology for conservation,Conservation Biology, 15, 970-979.
80.
Rothman, H. (2000). Saving the planet: The American response to the environment in the twentieth century. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
81.
Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385-403.
82.
Simpson, J. (2005). Dam!: Water, power, politics, and persuasion. New York: Pantheon.
83.
Smith, N. (1990). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
84.
State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game. (1986). Alaska habitat management guide: Economic overview of fish and wildlife. Juneau, AK: The Division of Wildlife.
85.
Stearns, L. B., & Almeida, P. D. (2004). The formation of state actor-social movement coalitions and favorable policy outcomes. Social Problems, 51, 478-504.
86.
Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P., & Kinnison, M. T. (2003). Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 94-101.
87.
Weaver, J. (Ed.). (1996). Defending mother earth: Native American perspectives on environmental justice. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
88.
White, R. (1995). Are you an environmentalist, or do you work for a living? In W. Cronon (Ed.),Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 185-204) New York: Norton.
89.
Wynne, B. (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning—Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm,Global Environmental Change, 2, 111-127.
90.
Zimmer, C. (2003). Rapid evolution can foil even the best-laid plans. Conservation Biology, 300, 895-895.
91.
Zimmerer, K. (2000). The reworking of conservation geographies: Nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 356-369.
