The author illustrates the role of NAFTA in the undermining of government attempts to regulate environmental conditions and public health. Two case studies under NAFTA Chapter 11 are examined: (a) Ethyl Corporation v. Canada and (b) Methanex Corporation v. United States. It is argued that multilateral trade agreements have resulted in limiting the power of governmental bodies to regulate their own environmental conditions and that this has been a consequence of two historical processes: (a) the expansion of trade liberalization under free market systems—part of what Schnaiberg calls the “treadmill of production”—and (b) a shift in sovereignty from the nation-state and multinational corporations to consortia of the former two and newly created “supranational organisms”—what Hardt and Negri call “Empire.”
Anderson, T. L. (Ed.). (1993). NAFTA and the environment. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
2.
Bell, D. (1973). The coming postindustrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic.
3.
Bensusan, G. (2002). NAFTA and labor: Impacts and outlooks. In E. J. Chambers & P. H. Smith (Eds.), NAFTA in the new millennium (pp. 243-264). La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
4.
Boas, M. (2000). The trade-environment nexus and the potential of regional trade institutions. New Political Economy, 5, 415-432.
5.
Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28, 39-78.
6.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Chambers, E. J., & Smith, P. H. (2002). NAFTA in the new millennium: Questions and contexts. In E. J. Chambers & P. H. Smith (Eds.), NAFTA in the new millennium (pp. 1-28). La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta Press.
8.
Chase-Dunn, C., Kawano, Y., & Brewer, B. D. (2000). Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65, 77-95.
9.
Couch, K., & Young, T. (1998). Leaking underground storage tanks as point sources of MTBE to groundwater and related MTBE-UST compatibility issues. In Environmental assessment of MTBE: A report to the governor and legislature of the state of California as sponsored by SB 521. Delivered to the governor’s office, November 12, 1998.
10.
Doremus, P. N., Keller, W., Pauly, L., & Reich, S. (1999). The myth of the global corporation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Drumbl, M. A. (2002). Environmental supra-nationalism. Washington and Lee Review, 59, 289-298.
12.
Foster, J. B. (1988). The fetish of Fordism. Monthly Review, 39, 14-33.
13.
Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Friends of the Earth. (2001). NAFTA Chapter 11 investor-to-state cases: Bankrupting democracy. Lessons for fast track and the free trade area of the Americas. Washington, DC: Public Citizen.
15.
Gaines, S. E. (2002). The masked ball of NAFTA Chapter 11: Foreign investors, local environmentalists, government officials, and disguised motives. In J. J. Kirton & V. W. Maclaren (Eds.), Linking trade, environment, and social cohesion: NAFTA experiences, global challenges (pp. 103-130). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
16.
Gould, K. A., Pellow, D. N., & Schnaiberg, A. (2004). Interrogating the treadmill of production: Everything you wanted to know about the treadmill, but were afraid to ask. Organization & Environment, 17, 296-316.
17.
Grossman, P. (2000). Corporate interest and trade liberalization. Organization & Environment, 13, 61-85.
18.
Haberman, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Hill.
19.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
20.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
21.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
22.
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Hufbauer, G. C., Esty, D. C., Orejas, D., Rubio, L., & Scott, J. J. (2000). NAFTA and the environment: Seven years later. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
24.
Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53-92.
25.
Johnson, M. L. (1998). Exposure of humans to MTBE from drinking water. Volume 5: Health and risk assessment, exposure assessment, water treatment and cost-benefit analysis. In Environmental assessment of MTBE: A report to the governor and legislature of the state of California as sponsored by SB 521. Delivered to the governor’s office, November 12, 1998.
26.
Johnson, P. M., & Beaulieu, A. (1996). The environment and NAFTA: Understanding and implementing the new continental law. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27.
Keller, A., Froines, J., Koshland, C., Reuter, J., Suffer, I., & Last, J. (1998). Environmental assessment of MTBE: A report to the governor and legislature of the state of California as sponsored by SB 521. Delivered to the governor’s office, November 12, 1998.
28.
Kuehl, T. (1996). Beyond sovereign territory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
Macmillan, F. (2001). WTO and the environment. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
31.
O’Connor, J. (1973). The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin’s.
32.
Magraw, D. (1995). NAFTA and the environment: Substance and process. In D. Magraw (Ed.), NAFTA and the environment: Substance and process (pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: Section of International Law and Practice, American Bar Association.
33.
O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes: Essays in ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford.
34.
Panitch, L. (1996). Rethinking the role of the state. In J. H. Mittelman (Ed.), Globalization: Critical reflections (pp. 83-116). Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
35.
Perrow, C. (1997). Organizing for environmental destruction. Organization & Environment, 10, 66-72.
36.
Public Citizen. (2001). NAFTA Chapter 11 investor-to-state cases: Bankrupting democracy. Lessons for fast track and the free trade area of the Americas. Washington, DC: Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch.
37.
Raffensberg, C., & Tickner, J. (Eds.). (1999). Protecting public health and the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle. Washington, DC: Island Press.
38.
Rao, P.K. (2001). Environmental trade disputes and the WTO. Lawrenceville, NJ: Pinninti.
39.
Sanchez, R. A. (2002). Governance, trade, and the environment in the context of NAFTA. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 1369-1393.
40.
Sassen, S. (1995). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
Sassen, S. (2003). The state and globalization. Intrerventions, 5, 241-248.
42.
Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Schnaiberg, A. (1994). The political economy of environmental problems and policies: Consciousness, conflict, and control capacity. In L. Freese (Ed.), Advances in human ecology (pp. 23-64). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
44.
Schnaiberg, A. (2002). Reflections on my 25 years before the mast of the environment and technology section. Organization & Environment, 15, 30-41.
45.
Schnaiberg, A., & Gould, K. E. (1994). Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
46.
Schnaiberg, A., & Gould, K. A. (2000). Environment and society: The enduring conflict. West Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn.
47.
Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D. N., & Weinberg, A. (2003). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In C. R. Humphrey, T. L. Lewis, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Environment, energy, and society: A new synthesis (pp. 412-425). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
48.
Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
49.
Smith, N. (2003). After the American Lebensraum: ‘Empire’, empire, and globalization. Interventions, 5, 249-270.
50.
Soloway, J. (2002). Environmental expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11: The phantom menace. In J. Kirton & V. W. Maclaren (Eds.), Linking trade, environment, and social cohesion: NAFTA experiences, global challenges (pp. 131-144). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
51.
Steinberg, R. H. (1997). Trade-environment negotiations in the EU, NAFTA, and WTO: Regional trajectories of rule development. American Journal of International Law, 91, 231-267.
52.
Steinberg, R. H. (2002). Understanding trade and the environment: Conceptual frameworks. In R. H. Steinberg (Ed.), The greening of trade law: International trade organizations and environmental issues (pp. 1-22). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
53.
Swan, A. C. (2000). Ethyl Corporation v. Canada, award on jurisdiction (under NAFTA/UNCITRAL). American Journal of International Law, 94, 159-166.
54.
Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 63-76.
55.
Swyngedouw, E., Page, B., & Kaika, M. (2002). Sustainability and policy innovation in a multi-level context: Crosscutting issues in the water sector. In P. Getimis, H. Heinelt, G. Kafkalas, R. Smith, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), Participatory governance in multilevel context: Concepts and experience (pp. 107-131). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
56.
Tickner, J. (Ed.). (2003). Precaution, environmental science, and preventative public policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
57.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
