Improvements in Speech Understanding With Wireless Binaural Broadband Digital Hearing Instruments in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Abstract

This investigation examined whether speech intelligibility in noise can be improved using a new, binaural broadband hearing instrument system. Participants were 36 adults with symmetrical, sensorineural hearing loss (18 experienced hearing instrument users and 18 without prior experience). Participants were fit binaurally in a planned comparison, randomized crossover design study with binaural broadband hearing instruments and advanced digital hearing instruments. Following an adjustment period with each device, participants underwent two speech-in-noise tests: the QuickSIN and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). Results suggested significantly better performance on the QuickSIN and the HINT measures with the binaural broadband hearing instruments, when compared with the advanced digital hearing instruments and unaided, across and within all noise conditions.

Keywords

hearing aid technology speech perception speech in noise focused contrasts

References

Allen, J.B. ( 2005). Consonant recognition and the articulation index. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2212-2223.

American National Standards Institute. (1997 ). ANSI S3.5-1997, American national standard methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index. New York: Author.

Best, V. , Carlile, S. , Craig, J. , & van Schaik, A. (2005). The role of high frequencies in speech localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 353-363.

Boothroyd, A. , & Medwetsky, L. ( 1992). Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids. Ear and Hearing, 13, 150-157.

Etymotic Research. (2001). QuickSIN: Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.3) [Audio CD]. Elk Grove Village, IL: Author.

Fletcher, H. , & Galt, R.H. ( 1950). The perception of speech and its relation to telephony . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 89-151.

Furr, R.M. , & Rosenthal, R. ( 2003). Repeated-measures contrasts for "multiple-pattern" hypotheses . Psychological Methods, 8, 275-293.

Houtgast, T. , & Steeneken, H.J.M. (1973). The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Acustica, 28, 66-73

Kates, J.M. , & Arehart, K.H. ( 2005). Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2224-2237.

10.

Killion, M.C. ( 2002). New thinking on hearing in noise: A generalized articulation index. Seminars in Hearing, 23, 57-75.

11.

Kortekaas, R. , & Stelmachowicz, P. (2000). Bandwidth effects on children’s perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: Acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 645-660.

12.

Kochkin S. ( 2005). Customer satisfaction with hearing aids in the digital age. Hearing Journal, 58(9), 30-37.

13.

Kringlebotn, M. ( 1999). A graphical method for calculating the speech intelligibility index and measuring hearing disability from audiograms. Scandanavian Audiology, 28, 151-160.

14.

Kryter, K.D. ( 1962). Methods for the calculation and use of the articulation index. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 1689-1697.

15.

Kuk, F. , & Baekgaard, L. ( 2009). Considerations in fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidths. Hearing Review, 16(11), 32-38.

16.

Meister, H. , Lausberg, I. , Kiessling, J. , Walger, M. , & von Wedel, H. ( 2002). Determining the importance of fundamental hearing aid attributes. Otology & Neurotology, 23, 457-462.

17.

Meister, H. , Lausberg, I. , Walger, M. , & von Wedel, H. ( 2001). Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes. Ear and Hearing, 22, 142-150.

18.

Lindley, G. ( 2009). The impact of an extended bandwidth and binaural compression in pediatric fittings. The Hearing Journal, in press.

19.

Maico Diagnostics. ( 2004a). Hearing in Noise Test (Version 2.0) [Audio CD]. Eden Prairie, MN: Author.

20.

Maico Diagnostics. ( 2004b). Operating Instructions HINT Audio CD 2.0. Eden Prairie, MN: Author.

21.

Nilsson, M. , Soli, S.D. , & Sullivan, J. ( 1994). Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085-1099.

22.

Rankovic, C.M. ( 2002). Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2545-2548.

23.

Rhebergen, K.S. , Versfeld, N.J. , & Dreschler, W.A. (2006). Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3988-3997.

24.

Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R.L. ( 1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Schum, D.J. , & Bruun Hansen, L. (2007). New technology and spatial resolution. Audiology Online. Retrieved February 9, 2010, from http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/article_detail.asp?wc=1&article_id=1854

26.

Souza, P.E. , Yueh, B. , Sarubbi, M. , & Loovis, C.F. ( 2000). Fitting hearing aids with the articulation index: Impact on hearing aid effectiveness. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37, 473-481.

27.

Stelmachowicz, P.G. , Lewis, D.E. , Choi, S. , & Hoover, B. ( 2007). Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear and Hearing, 28, 483-494.

28.

Steeneken, H.J.M. & Houtgast, T. ( 1980). A physical method for measuring speech transmission quality . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 318-326.

29.

Valente, M. , Mispagel, K.M. , Tchorz, J. , & Fabry, D. ( 2006). Effect of type of noise and loudspeaker array on the performance of omnidirectional and directional microphones. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17, 398-412.

30.

Vickers, D.A. , Moore, B.C.J. , & Baer, T. ( 2001). Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1164-1175.

31.

Walden, T.C. , & Walden, B.E. ( 2004). Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living . Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 342-352.

32.

Wilson, R.H. , McArdle, R.A. , & Smith, S.L. ( 2007). An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 844-856.