Advances in technology and expanding candidacy guidelines have motivated many clinics to consider children with precipitously sloping high-frequency hearing loss as candidates for cochlear implants (CIs). A case study is presented of a pediatric CI patient whose hearing thresholds were preserved within 10 dB of preimplant levels (125-750 Hz) after receiving a fully inserted 31.5-mm electrode array at one ear. The primary goal of this study was to explore the possible benefit of using both a hearing aid (HA) and a CI at one ear while using a HA at the opposite ear. The authors find that although the use of bilateral hearing aids with a CI may only provide a slight benefit, careful attention must be paid to the coordinated fitting of devices, especially at the ear with two devices.
Allman, B.L., Bittencourt-Navarrete, R.E., Keniston, L.P., Medina, A.E., Wang, M.Y., & Meredith, M.A. (2008). Do cross-modal projections always result in multisensory integration? Cerebral Cortex , 18, 2066-2076.
2.
Bent, T., Buchwald, A., & Alford, W. (2007). Research on spoken language processing: Inter-talker differences in intelligibility for two types of degraded speech. Bloomington: Indiana University.
3.
Blamey, P.J., & Saunders, E. (2008). A review of bimodal binaural hearing systems and fitting. Acoustics Australia, 36, 87-92.
4.
Bradlow, A.R., Torretta, G.M., & Pisoni, D.B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20, 255-272.
5.
Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R.I. (2008). American sign language syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled readers: Bilingual and bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 367-388.
Ching, T.Y.C., Dillon, H., & Byrne, D. (1998). Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1128-1140.
8.
Ching, T.Y.C., Incerti, P., & Hill, M. (2004). Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear and Hearing, 25, 9-21.
9.
Ching, T.Y.C., Incerti, P., Hill, M., & van Wanrooy, E. (2006). An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/bimodal hearing devices . Audiology & Neuro-otology, 11(Suppl. 1), 6-11.
10.
Ching, T.Y.C., Psarros, C., Hill, M., Dillon, H., & Incerti, P. (2001). Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear and Hearing, 22, 365-380.
11.
Ching, T.Y.C., van Wanrooy, E., & Dillon, H. (2007). Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: A review. Trends in Amplification, 11, 161-192.
12.
Dillon, H. (2001). Binaural and bilateral considerations in hearing aid fitting. In H. Dillon (Ed.), Hearing aids (pp. 370-403). New York: Thieme .
13.
Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R., Lewis, K., McKarns, S., Ratigan, J., Spahr, A., et al. (2009). Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10-mm hybrid electrodes. Audiology & Neuro-otology , 14, 181-189.
14.
Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R.H., Spahr, A.J., & McKarns, S.A. (2008). The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 13, 105-112.
15.
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H.B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T.H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism , 11, 43-61.
16.
Fitzgerald, M.B., Sagi, E., Jackson, M., Shapiro, W.H., Roland, J.T., Jr., Waltzman, S.B., et al. (2008). Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing. Otology & Neuro-otology, 29, 168-173.
17.
Fraysse, B., Macias, A.R., Sterkers, O., Burdo, S., Ramsden, R., Deguine, O., et al. (2006). Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Otology & Neuro-otology, 27, 624-633.
18.
Fu, Q.-J., Chinchilla, S., and Galvin, J.J. (2004). "The Role of Spectral and Temporal Cues in Voice Gender Discrimination by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users ," Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology5, 253-260.
Gantz, B.J., Turner, C., and Gfeller, K.E. (2006). "Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant ," Audiol Neurootol11 Suppl 1, 63-68.
21.
Gantz, B.J., Turner, C., Gfeller, K.E., & Lowder, M.W. (2005). Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope, 115, 796-802.
22.
Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., McKarns, S.A., & Spahr, A.J. (2007). Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: Word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 835-843.
23.
Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., Spahr, A.J., & McKarns, S.A. (2007). Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1194-1202.
24.
Gstoettner, W.K., Helbig, S., Maier, N., Kiefer, J., Radeloff, A., & Adunka, O.F. (2006). Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 11(Suppl. 1), 49-56.
25.
Gstoettner, W., Kiefer, J., Baumgartner, W.-D., Pok, S., Peters, S., & Adunka, O. (2004). Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica , 124, 348-352.
26.
Hogan, C.A., & Turner, C.W. (1998). High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 432-441.
27.
James, C.J., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., Lenarz, T., Mawman, D., Ramos, A., et al. (2006). Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 11(Suppl. 1), 57-62.
28.
Kiefer, J., Gstoettner, W., Baumgartner, W., Pok, S.M., Tillein, J., Ye, Q., et al. (2004). Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 124, 272-280.
29.
Kiefer, J., Pok, M., Adunka, O., Sturzebecher, E., Baumgartner, W., Schmidt, M., et al. (2005). Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a clinical study. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 10, 134-144.
30.
Killion, M.C., Niquette, P.A., Gudmundsen, G.I., Revit, L.J., & Banerjee, S. (2004). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 2395-2405.
31.
Killion, M.C., Niquette, P.A., Gudmundsen, G.I., Revit, L.J., & Banerjee, S. (2006). Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners [Erratum]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1888.
32.
Kong, Y.Y., Stickney, G.S., & Zeng, F.G. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1351-1361.
33.
Kortekaas, R.W., & Stelmachowicz, P.G. (2000). Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: Acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 645-660.
34.
Litovsky, R., Parkinson, A., Arcaroli, J., & Sammeth, C. (2006). Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear and Hearing, 27, 714-731.
35.
McDermott, H.J., & Sucher, C.M. (2006). Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli. Hearing Research, 218, 81-88.
36.
Peters, K.P. (2006). Emotion Perception in Speech: Discrimination, Identification, and the Effects of Talker and Sentence Variability. Program in audiology and communication sciences. St. Louis, MO : Washington University School of Medicine.
37.
Peterson, G.E., & Lehiste, I. (1962). Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 62-70.
38.
Potts, L.G. (2006). "Recognition and Localization of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Wearing a Digital Hearing Aid in the Non-implanted Ear (Bimodal Hearing)," unpublished PhD, in Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences (Washington University, St. Louis).
39.
Ross, M. (2008). Cochlear implants and hearing aids: Some personal and professional reflections. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, xvii-xxii.
40.
Schafer, E.C., Amlani, A.M., Seibold, A., & Shattuck, P.L. (2007). A meta-analytic comparison of binaural benefits between bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation . Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 760-776.
41.
Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., Laurnagaray, D., et al. (2005). The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends in Amplification, 9, 159-197.
42.
Sinnett, S., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2008). The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation. Acta Psychologica, 128, 153-161.
43.
Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Piotrowska, A., & Anderson, I. (2007). Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children . International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71, 1407-1413.
44.
Spahr, A.J., & Dorman, M.F. (2004). Performance of subjects fit with the advanced Bionics CII and nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Archives of Otolaryngology- Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 624-628.
45.
Stelmachowicz, P.G., Pittman, A.L., Hoover, B.M., & Lewis, D.E. (2001). Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2183-2190.
46.
Stelmachowicz, P.G., Pittman, A.L., Hoover, B.M., Lewis, D.E., & Moeller, M.P. (2004). The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 556-562.
Turner, C., Gantz, B.J., & Reiss, L. (2008). Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing . Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, 769-778.
49.
Vermeire, K., Anderson, I., Flynn, M., & Van de Heyning, P. (2008). The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear and Hearing, 29, 76-86.
50.
von Ilberg, C., Kiefer, J., Tillein, J., Pfenningdorff, T., Hartmann, R., Sturzebecher, E., et al. (1999). Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL: Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology and Its Related Specialties, 61, 334-340.
51.
Yao, W.N., Turner, C.W., & Gantz, B.J. (2006). Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1085-1090.
