Abstract
Recent advancements in coffee processing increasingly involve the use of isolated or native microorganisms, such as starter cultures, to enhance desired coffee characteristics and modulate sensory properties. This study employed a participatory research approach, collaborating with coffee producers to investigate the incorporation of homemade starter cultures into coffee bioprocessing. Coffee was processed using both wet and semi-dry methods, with three distinct starter cultures—lactic acid bacteria, yeast combined with fruit, and coffee pulp leachate—evaluated alongside respective controls. Parameters such as titratable acidity, antioxidant capacity, caffeine, trigonelline, theobromine content, and sensory profiles were assessed. Significant differences in antioxidant capacity were observed across the coffee processing methods; notably, coffee roasted using the wet method exhibited significantly higher antioxidant capacity compared to coffee roasted using the semi-dry method. However, no significant differences were found in caffeine content or titratable acidity levels across all methods. All bioprocesses resulted in variations in cupping profiles compared to their respective controls. Considering the specific conditions under which bioprocessing took place, the introduction of starter cultures led to notable changes in coffee transformation processes relative to their control treatments. For instance, the use of yeast and fruit inoculum increased the total score of washed coffee by seven points compared to its control. Similarly, the addition of lactic inoculum to honey-processed coffee led to a three-point increase relative to its control. These results indicate promising advancements in coffee bioprocessing. Importantly, all methods are scalable, cost-effective, and straightforward, offering significant potential for coffee producers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
