This study investigates lactic acid as a sustainable alternative to sodium hypochlorite for apple sanitization in juice production, along with the addition of Lacticaseibacillus casei as a biopreservative. Lactic acid showed superior effectiveness in reducing microbial contamination, achieving reductions of 2.64 log CFU/mL for mesophilic aerobes, 2.41 log CFU/mL for molds and yeasts, and 2.41 log CFU/mL for Enterobacteriaceae. Notably, lactic acid-treated juice remained coliform-free for 11 days, with a significant delay in spoilage compared to sodium hypochlorite treatment. Combined with L. casei, the absence of coliforms was maintained over a 20-day refrigerated storage, suggesting a synergistic effect that enhances safety. Additionally, L. casei retained high viability in the lactic acid-treated juice, with counts of 6.48 log CFU/mL, confirming its potential as a biopreservative. The treatment lowered the juice pH, further inhibiting microbial growth and contributing to enhanced microbiological stability. This approach emphasizes the effectiveness of natural biopreservatives in fruit juice preservation, a focus often limited to animal-based products.
AlakomiH-LSkyttäESaarelaM, et al. (2000) Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative Bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane. Applied and Environmental Microbiology66(5): 2001–2005.
2.
Al RiachyRStrubCDurandN, et al. (2024) The influence of long-term storage on the epiphytic microbiome of postharvest apples and on penicillium expansum occurrence and patulin accumulation. Toxins16(2): 102.
3.
AmruthaBSundarKShettyPH (2017) Effect of organic acids on biofilm formation and quorum signaling of pathogens from fresh fruits and vegetables. Microbial Pathogenesis111: 156–162.
4.
AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.Washington, DC., USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
5.
APHA (2001) Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, 4th ed.Washington: American Public Health Association, p. 676.
6.
APHA (2015) Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods, Washington: American Public Health Association.
ChenCCLaiCCHuangHL, et al. (2019) Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus Species against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Frontiers in Microbiology10(April): 789.
9.
DengHZhaoPTYangTG, et al. (2022) A comparative study of the cloudy apple juice sterilized by high-temperature short-time or high hydrostatic pressure processing: Shelf-life, phytochemical and microbial view. Food Science and Technology42: e63620.
10.
DivyashreeSAnjaliPGSomashekaraiahR, et al. (2021) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus casei – MYSRD 108 and Lactobacillus plantarum-MYSRD 71 with potential antimicrobial activity against Salmonella paratyphi. Biotechnology Reports32: e00672.
FontelesTVCostaMGMDe JesusALT, et al. (2012) Optimization of the fermentation of cantaloupe juice by Lactobacillus casei NRRL B-442. Food and Bioprocess Technology5(7): 2819–2826.
14.
GomesTAFilhoMRSZielinskiAAF, et al. (2014) Microbial levels in apple must and their association with fruit selection, washing and sanitization. Journal of Food Safety34(2): 141–149.
15.
GraçaASantoDEstevesE, et al. (2015) Evaluation of microbial quality and yeast diversity in fresh-cut apple. Food Microbiology51: 179–185.
16.
GuanNLiuL (2020) Microbial response to acid stress: Mechanisms and applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology104(1): 51–65.
17.
HopkinsDZParisiMADawsonPL, et al. (2021) Surface decontamination of fresh, whole peaches (Prunus persica) using sodium hypochlorite or acidified electrolyzed water solutions. International Journal of Fruit Science21(1): 1–11.
18.
HungYCWatersBWYemmireddyVK, et al. (2017) Ph effect on the formation of THM and HAA disinfection byproducts and potential control strategies for food processing. Journal of Integrative Agriculture16(12): 2914–2923.
19.
KimJKimYMLebakaVR, et al. (2022) Lactic acid for green chemical industry: Recent advances in and future prospects for production technology, recovery, and applications. Fermentation8(11): 609.
20.
KrugMDTravisCKDanylukMD, et al. (2020) Outbreaks of foodborne disease associated with fruit and vegetable juices, 1922–2019. Food Science and Human Nutrition Departament2020(5): 1.
21.
LiHLiuLZhangS, et al. (2013) Potential use of Lactobacillus casei AST18 as a bioprotective culture in yogurt. Food Control34: 675–680.
22.
LopesSJSSant’AnaASFreireL (2023) Non-thermal emerging processing technologies: Mitigation of microorganisms and mycotoxins, sensory and nutritional properties maintenance in clean label fruit juices. Food Research International168: 112727.
23.
MarçalSCamposDAPintadoM (2022) Washing with sodium hypochlorite or peracetic acid: Its impact on microbiological quality, phytochemical composition and antioxidant activity of mango peels. Food Control139: 109080.
24.
Nicolau-LapeñaIColás-MedàPViñasI, et al. (2022) Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes on apple peel and apple juice by ultraviolet C light treatments with two irradiation devices. International Journal of Food Microbiology364: 109535.
25.
NtzimaniASemenoglouIDermesonlouoglouE, et al. (2022) Surface decontamination and shelf-life extension of gilthead sea bream by alternative washing treatments. Sustainability14(10): 5887.
26.
Ortiz-SolàJAbadiasMColás-MedàP, et al. (2020) Evaluation of a sanitizing washing step with different chemical disinfectants for the strawberry processing industry. International Journal of Food Microbiology334: 108810.
27.
RandazzoWCoronaOGuarcelloR, et al. (2016) Development of new non-dairy beverages from Mediterranean fruit juices fermented with water kefir microorganisms. Food Microbiology54: 40–51.
28.
Raybaudi-MassiliaRMMosqueda-MelgarJMartín-BellosoO (2009) Antimicrobial activity of malic acid against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple, pear and melon juices. Food Control20(2): 105–112.
29.
RibeiroAPOGomesFDSSantosKMO, et al. (2020) Development of a probiotic non-fermented blend beverage with juçara fruit: Effect of the matrix on probiotic viability and survival to the gastrointestinal tract. LWT118: 108756.
30.
SilvaSBernardiAOGarciaMV, et al. (2024) Sanitizers used for fungal spoilage control in dry-fermented cured meat production. Fermentation10(3): 169.
31.
StarekAPawłatJChudzikB, et al. (2019) Evaluation of selected microbial and physicochemical parameters of fresh tomato juice after cold atmospheric pressure plasma treatment during refrigerated storage. Scientific Reports9(1): 8407.
32.
StefanelloAFracariJCSilvaM, et al. (2021) Influence of type, concentration, exposure time, temperature, and presence of organic load on the antifungal efficacy of industrial sanitizers against Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCC 16404). Food Microbiology97: 103740.
33.
SzczepańskaJSkąpskaSMarszałekK (2021) Continuous high-pressure cooling-assisted homogenization process for stabilization of apple juice. Food and Bioprocess Technology14: 1101–1117.
34.
TripathiMKGiriSK (2014) Probiotic functional foods: Survival of probiotics during processing and storage. Journal of Functional Foods9(1): 225–241.
35.
ValiolahiMNajafiMAEskandaniMA, et al. (2019) Effects of organic acid alone and in combination with H2O2 and NaCl on Escherichia coli O157:H7: An evaluation of antioxidant retention and overall acceptability in basil leaves (Ocimum basilicum). International Journal of Food Microbiology292: 56–63.
36.
WangJSunYTaoD, et al. (2019) Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and naturally present microbe counts on lettuce using an acid mixture of acetic and lactic acid. Microorganisms7: 2–11.
37.
YangJSunYGaoT, et al. (2022) Fermentation and storage characteristics of “fuji” apple juice using Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum: Microbial growth, metabolism of bioactives and in vitro bioactivities. Frontiers in Nutrition9: 833906.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
